Tag: metro Detroit

Categories
business law internet law Uncategorized

Is a Bad Review Defamation? Protecting Your Business Reputation Online.

Following my previous article about online defamation, business owners frequently ask me whether they can “sue” Facebook or Yelp or Google, etc., to get a negative review removed. Or whether they can “sue” the poster for “reputation damages.” This is especially common in the trucking industry, where Carrier411 hosts a platform that allows brokers and customers to review carriers. Often times, a dispute or a misunderstanding between a carrier and a customer leads to a “report” or a bad review on Carrier411 that causes frustration and may even result in lost business.

A negative review by itself is not always defamation. To win on a defamation claim in court, you need to prove: (1) a false and defamatory statement about the plaintiff; (2) unprivileged publication to a third party; (3) fault amounting to at least negligence; and (4) actionability per se or the existence of special harm.

What does this all mean for the business owner faced with a negative review?

  • First, a successful defamation claim requires a false and defamatory statement. This is the most commonly misunderstood element, but it is absolutely critical. A negative review – even if the business owner has a different side of the story, or does not agree with it – is not actionable unless it is actually false. A statement of opinion – even if negative – is not a false statement of fact because there is no such thing as a false opinion. That is an important difference, especially in the age of social media. A person may go on your restaurant website and freely post something like “I hate the atmosphere and I did not like the food here at all.” That is not defamation, even though it is a negative review. Rather, it is a statement of opinion. A good test is to ask: how am I going to prove that the statement is false? What types of evidence will I introduce to refute the “facts” that were posted? There is no evidence that you can introduce to refute a statement of opinion – in other words, the customer’s perception of atmosphere and the food is their own. If they did not like it, then it is their opinion, and they are entitled to it. Also, the statement must be defamatory, that is injurious to your business reputation. A statement that is false, but is not negative or otherwise critical of your business is not actionable. For example, if a review says “This restaurant is located in midtown Detroit,” when in fact the restaurant is downtown, the statement is false, but not defamatory.
  • Second, there must be unprivileged publication. “Publication” just means dissemination to others – meaning third parties. Of course, if something is posted online, it is published. “Unprivileged” means that the statement is not made in the context of a protected communication, such as a legal filing with the court, a police report, or some other type of special protected communication.
  • Third, the false statement must be made with at least negligence. That simply means that the person making the statement either knows that it is false or does not bother to try to find out before publishing. Even if a person publishes a false statement about your business, they may not be liable if they consider it true based on a reasonable inquiry.
  • Fourth, there must be an element of damages. In business cases, this element is usually satisfied automatically, as damages to business reputation are considered actionable per se. However, actual damages are still critical and must be proven – otherwise you may end up recovering only nominal damages. While punitive and exemplary damages, as well as attorney fees, are available under MCL 600.2911, there are no guarantees that they will be awarded. A case is always more persuasive if there are actual damages that are proximately caused by the negative post, review, or other published statement.

Even if you can prove the four elements, there are practical factors to consider before filing a lawsuit. Are you prepared to bear significant litigation costs – thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars? Are you prepared to invest time away from your business to prove your case? Never treat litigation as an investment opportunity because no business owner makes money paying their attorney and spending time in court.

The good news is that there are other options besides litigation that you can discuss with your attorney. Often times, an informal discussion with a dissatisfied customer can solve the issue. A cease-and-desist letter can be effective as well. If the potential damages are significant, pre-suit mediation may be the most cost effective option to resolve the dispute.

One final note – in Michigan, defamation claims must be brought within a year of the event. Other states may have different deadlines, but if you think you may have a claim, talk to an attorney sooner rather than later.

Dan Artaev is an experienced business attorney who advises a number of domestic and international businesses on various topics, including defamation. Email us or call us to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2024 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.-

Categories
business law internet law

Ask the Crypto Tax Lawyer: How Can I Reduce My Crypto Taxes?

Important: The information in this article applies to individual investors and LLCs that are taxed as pass-through entities. The rules are different for corporations and LLCs electing to be taxed as a corporation and are not addressed here. This article is for informational and promotional purposes only and, as always, you should consult with a professional about your specific tax situation before taking any action.

Despite its name, cryptocurrency or “crypto” is not really currency. For tax purposes, it is treated as “property,” which means it is taxed similar to stocks and bonds. As I previously wrote, buying and selling crypto is subject to capital gains tax. Paying for goods and services with crypto is likewise subject to capital gains tax. Exchanging one crypto asset for another is a taxable event as well.

“Crypto tax” has a nice ring to it, but it is nothing more than the application of ordinary capital gains tax to cryptocurrency transactions. The most important aspect of crypto investing – whether individually or as part of a business – is good record keeping. Exchange platforms like Coinbase can generate basic reports to use at tax time. But remember that you must also keep records when you pay for goods and services with crypto or receive payments in crypto. For tax purposes, when you pay someone in Bitcoin or Ethereum, the IRS considers that you have sold the cryptocurrency for cash (and realized a capital gain or loss). When you receive crypto as payment for goods and services, you acquired ordinary income in the amount equal to the market value of the crypto at the time of the transaction. In short, keep good records, you will need them.

What are some top strategies to minimize capital gains tax from cryptocurrency investing? As with any other investment, a little bit of planning can help you minimize your tax bill at the end of the year.

  1. HODL. The capital gains tax rate is different for short-term and long-term gains. Purchasing and selling crypto within a 365 day period is considered the short term, and any gains during that period are taxed like ordinary income (i.e. wages). Short-term crypto income will be taxed between 10% and 37%, depending on your tax bracket. On the other hand, selling crypto more than a year after buying it lets you take advantage of the lower long-term capital gains rate. Depending on your income level, long-term capital gains are taxed at either 0%, 15%, or 20%, with most people falling into the middle 15% bracket. For example, if you are paying a 22% rate on ordinary income, but are in the 15% bracket for long-term gains, you will end up with significant savings on your tax bill.
  2. Offset. Of course, not everyone buys crypto for long term investing. If you are trying to time the market and profit from crypto’s volatility, holding to gain favorable capital gains treatment may not be a feasible strategy. Tax law generally allows offsetting capital gains with losses, but the strategy does have limitations. Losses must first be used to offset gains of the same kind – for instance, short-term losses must be used to offset short-term gains, and only if you have excess short-term losses can you shift them over to reduce your long-term capital gains. If you still have remaining losses, you can take an ordinary income deduction of up to $3,000 for the tax year and retain the balance to offset next year’s gains and income.
  3. Decrease Taxable Income. Like with other “property,” you can time your sales to your specific income situation. You may want to sell appreciated crypto when you have less income than you anticipate in the future. Or, you may accelerate 401k/IRA contributions to take advantage of the up-front tax break. Health Savings Account contributions are another taxable income reduction alternative, especially if you are anticipating significant health care expenditures in the near future. For businesses, business expenses can be used to reduce taxable income, but be sure that the expense is both “ordinary” and “necessary.” For example, renting a building and paying electricity costs for your Bitcoin farm are probably ordinary and necessary expenses. Also, be careful to properly categorize any business start-up costs, assets, and improvements, which are treated as capital expenses (and therefore are different than your ordinary business expenses).
  4. Set up a self-directed IRA. Self-directed IRAs or SDIRAs are little-known but powerful investment tools for the sophisticated investor. They allow you to take full control of your retirement investments and direct the funds into non-traditional assets. Commonly used for holding real estate, private company stock, and precious metals, SDIRAs can certainly be used to buy and hold crypto. Most bank-managed retirement plans can be converted to the self-directed kind, but there are additional fees and special rules about what your SDIRA can and cannot do to retain the tax-favored treatment by the IRS. In essence, the SDIRA can be used to convert all or part of your retirement portfolio into an investment “checkbook” that you can then use to purchase and hold assets like crypto for the benefit of your retirement.
  5. Move, gift, donate, or leave it to your heirs. Depending on your situation, there are other options that may be used to optimize your tax situation. If you are in a state that imposes its own income tax, you may want to consider moving to a no income tax jurisdiction. Or potentially incorporating and locating your Bitcoin mining company there. Likewise, depending on your future goals, retirement situation, and estate planning, it may be advantageous to shift some of your crypto holdings (especially those where you are looking at a significant gain) towards those objectives. For example, if you leave your crypto portfolio as part of your estate, heirs would receive a “step up” in basis and receive the crypto at the fair market value at the time of death. This significantly reduces their tax bill and something to consider if a crypto portfolio is part of your estate planning.

There are other strategies that may be available based on your particular situation. Remember to keep good records, plan ahead, and get a professional to answer all your crypto tax questions.

Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law independent contractors

Are Non-Compete Agreements Enforceable Against Independent Contractors in Michigan?

Photo by energepic.com on Pexels.com

This is one of those gray legal areas where the answer is “it depends on the facts of the situation.” Previously, I wrote about the basics of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements that are becoming increasingly common in all industries. At their core, non-compete agreements restrain the free labor market, and are therefore analyzed under the Michigan Anti-Trust Reform Act (“MARA”) (MCL 445.774a), which sets out a four-factor “reasonableness” test for the agreement. To be enforceable, the non-compete must: (1) Protect a reasonable competitive business interest; (2) Be reasonable in terms of duration; (3) Be reasonable in terms of geographical area; and (4) Be reasonable in terms of the the type of employment or business affected. Although the four-factor test in MARA expressly refers to “employer” and “employee,” lawyers and businesses frequently cited the same test when evaluating non-competes in other relationships, such as between two sophisticated business entities or an independent contractor.

In a 2017 opinion, Innovation Ventures v. Liquid Manufacturing, the Michigan Supreme Court clarified that the MARA test only applies to employment relationships. A different test applies to commercial agreements between sophisticated business entities. The case involved the manufacturer of 5-Hour Energy, and the Court looked at the plain language used by the Legislature to determine that the test does not apply to agreements between businesses. The Court further explained that MARA does not set forth a test for commercial agreements, but instead instructs courts to look to federal anti-trust law for similar legal analysis. The applicable test is the so-called “rule of reason,” which can be summarized as whether, under all relevant facts, the covenant unreasonably restrains competition. While the test may seem similar to the MARA four-factor analysis, it is different because it focuses on the reasonableness of the effect on the free market, rather than the impact on the restrained party.

What about independent contractors? Can a hiring party insist on a non-compete as part of the independent contractor agreement? And if so, what are the parameters for a valid non-compete for an independent contractor? First, parties are generally free to contract for anything, and so an independent contractor may certainly agree to a non-compete clause as part of their contract. Second, the non-compete will be evaluated under the same “rule of reason” as an agreement between two sophisticated commercial entities. This is because an independent contractor is not an employee – thus MARA’s four-factor test does not apply. Where MARA does not apply, the Legislature instructs courts to look at federal anti-trust law. Thus, the outcome is the same as with commercial contracts under Innovation Ventures. That means the rule of reason applies and the court will look at the effect of the restraint on the relevant market.

In applying federal anti-trust law, there is also a concept called a “per se” anti-trust violation. A “per se” violation is conduct that violates Section 1 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act by its very nature and does not require proofs of the actual anti-competitive effect or the relevant market. Simply put, a “per se” anti-trust violation is one where there is no redeeming competition-facilitating effect. A classic example in the employment arena is the low-wage hourly worker non-compete. A restraint on an $11-per-hour janitor precluding him or her to work for a competitor serves no legitimate purpose whatsoever and is clearly abusive. A court will not enforce such a “per-se” violation. The independent contractor analysis would be similar – if there is no legitimate pro-competitive justification for the non-compete, it may not be enforceable.

One final word of warning. If you are a business considering or using non-compete clauses in your independent contractor agreements, some courts consider such clauses indicative of an employment relationship. If an individual or government agency (like the worker’s compensation agency) challenges your classification, a non-compete clause is evidence of control that weighs in favor of finding someone is an employee. And, if someone is misclassified as an independent contractor, there are a myriad of penalties, fines, and other problems that you may face.

Non-compete and non-solicitation clauses and contracts are becoming more and more standard. However, it is a mistake to blindly use them for all your employees or independent contractors. Each situation warrants its own analysis. Otherwise, your business risks not only losing non-compete litigation, but also risks other unintended adverse effects, such as a finding of an employment relationship where one was not intended.

More questions? Need a non-compete reviewed or drafted for your situation? Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.


© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law

Are you expecting payments under a lease, land contract, or promissory note? It may be time to dust off those documents and call a lawyer.

The economy is still uncertain, especially for business owners who rely on lease payments, land contract payments, promissory notes, or other installment-type payments for their income are in for tough month. Payees may very well be unable to make payments on time or at all. What are your options to protect your rights? It is a good time to find those documents and contact a business attorney to review your options. While every document is different, here is a general overview of some key provisions and concepts:

  1. When is the payment actually due? More often than not, a payment clause in a note or lease has a built in “grace period” – usually between 3 and 10 days after the due date for the payee to “make up” any missed payment without penalty. Importantly, many agreements also require written notification that a payment is late or has been missed – it is critical to review the documents in question, determine exactly when a payment is considered late, and to send out notice to preserve your rights.
  2. Document any modifications in writing. If you do agree to a reduced payment, different payment deadline, or some other modification with your tenant or debtor, make sure to document the agreement in writing. Most contracts (including leases) have provisions that require that any amendment be in writing. And, you don’t want to be accused of agreeing to something that you did not actually agree to later on. Further, a written record goes a long way from protecting you against any future argument of “waiver” or that you simply abandoned your rights by failing to insist on strict adherence to the contract.
  3. Find out what happens if there IS a default. Despite your best efforts to work with a tenant or a note payee, there may come a situation where they simply cannot make the payment or refuse to agree to a reasonable modification of their obligation. In that case, you need to review the default provisions with your attorney and give prompt, written notice of default. Here are some special considerations:
    • Promissory note: (a) determine whether there is a default interest rate that entitles you to higher interest in the event of default; and (b) if the note is secured by collateral, determine the status and location of such collateral. Talk to an attorney immediately if you think the collateral may be destroyed or otherwise impaired.
    • Land contract: A land contract is unique because the seller retains ownership of the property and the deed until the land contract is paid in full. However, land contract forfeiture is not automatic – there is still a requirement that proper notice be given and the landlord go through the other steps required by Michigan law before actually retaking possession of the premises.
    • Lease: Michigan law provides for summary proceedings to recover premises and evict non-paying tenants – a useful process where a landlord wants a paying tenant to take the place of a delinquent. Summary eviction is still available as a remedy – but a new tenant is not a given, judicial proceedings are delayed, and there may be other considerations to discuss with your attorney before filing those court papers.
  4. However, you can still file a lawsuit to preserve your rights. You can still file a lawsuit to enforce a default on a note or lease. Remember, in addition to (or instead of) an order of eviction, you can get a money judgment for unpaid rent. Now it is more important than ever to retain qualified counsel to protect your rights in these uncertain times.

Contact attorney Dan Artaev today at dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law

5 Legal Tips for Business Owners Weathering the Coronavirus Disruption

There is no doubt you are distracted by this coronavirus outbreak. Constant news alerts, supply shortages, government-mandated closures and cancellations make it all but impossible to also run your business. However, remember that your lawyers are available to assist you. For example, if you have questions about obligations to your employees, insurance coverage questions, contract responsibilities, or anything else related to your business, feel free to reach out. In the meantime, here are 5 legal tips to help your business through the crisis with minimal disruption:

  1. Review your existing contracts for a “force majeure” clause. Do you have a contract with a supplier, distributor, or vendor? Has the coronavirus outbreak affected performance under the contract – for example, are payments being delayed? Are shipments delayed? Has demand dropped to the level where you are having trouble paying normal operating expenses? The reality is that a lot contracts were negotiated in “good times” without the threat of external forces disrupting business operations. This means not all contracts provide for what happens in times of crisis, and if they do, they are often generic provisions that may not even be applicable to the current situation. Nevertheless, some contracts have standard terms — known as “force majeure” or “Act of God” clauses — that allow for contract termination, modification, or delay in performance under certain extraneous circumstances. Importantly, even if your contract does have such a clause, it often includes notice obligations to the other party – so if you suspect that contract performance may be disrupted (either on your end or on the part of the other party), contact a business attorney for guidance on your rights and obligations.
  2. Review your existing lease and make sure you know your rights and responsibilities. Leases are another type of contract that may be affected by the pandemic. In general, commercial leases are drafted in such a way that a tenant’s obligation to pay rent is absolute and non-excusable. If you are a business owner having trouble making rent payments due to decreased demand, you need to carefully review your lease for any possible options, including early termination. Alternatively, you should be prepared to discuss lease modifications with your landlord. If you are on the landlord side, reach out to your tenants and discuss any potential issues directly. While eviction is still available as a remedy, consider that finding a replacement tenant may be more difficult at this time, and you may want to conserve resources instead of spending money to evict someone. And as always, reach out to an attorney if you have any questions about your rights and obligations under any lease.
  3. Purchasing or selling a business? Adjust your expectations or consider termination. Uncertainty is high, which means that many business deals that seemed profitable a few months ago may no longer be attractive to potential buyers. Whether you signed a letter of intent and are conducting due diligence, or you are at the purchase agreement drafting or even closing stage of the transaction, make sure you know your rights and responsibilities. Is there a specific time for performance and what happens if there is a delay? Is “time of the essence” to this transaction? Particularly, be aware of any penalties or liabilities that may be attached to termination of the pending transaction before closing. There may be a liquidated damages provision involved, or perhaps something more onerous, like an “actual damages” clause, including attorney fees. You should have an attorney representing you in any buy-sell transaction, and in the current situation, it is especially important to retain advice about your options.
  4. Know that courts are still functioning, although in a diminished or delayed capacity. One of the reasons that it is critical to know your rights and responsibilities under your various contracts, is that you want to avoid business litigation. But you may think, aren’t courts closed? So how can I protect my rights? Most courts are actually operating in a “diminished” capacity, with civil litigation taking a back seat to criminal matters. However, a lawsuit can still be filed. And, if there is a need for emergency relief like an injunction against a former employee actively stealing customers, it is still available. Understand that even if the justice system is operating in a limited capacity, it is still operating. Litigation is a possibility – and expect that even when this pandemic is over, there will still be litigation fallout over breaches of contract and other business matters that arose due to business disruptions in this difficult time.
  5. This is a perfect opportunity for “corporate catch-up.” Even if your business is currently slow or completely shut down, this time may be a great opportunity to talk to your lawyer about some business matters that you have been putting off. For example, have you trademarked your logo, slogan, or business name? Do you have a new business idea and need to incorporate a new business? Or, do you need to update your LLC’s papers to reflect the fact that you hired your niece as your new CFO? Are there old corporate entities out there (after an acquisition or merger) that continue to exposre you to personal liability? And ask yourself, is your business prepared for the 4 Ds — divorce, death, disability, and debt? Now may be the perfect time for “corporate catch-up.”

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com or 269-930-0254 to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law intellectual property

Don’t Spin Out: 5 Lessons for Every Business Owner From the Peloton Copyright Lawsuit.

Those of you who follow me on Instagram know that I am the #Trilawyer (basically, a lawyer whose hobby is doing triathlons). The cycling leg just happens to be my favorite, I love going to spin class at the gym, and I am also a big fan of watching pro cycling on TV. So obviously when I saw the news featuring BOTH the law and indoor cycling training, I had to write about it. A group of music publishers are suing Peloton, the company behind those heavily advertised stationary bikes and on-demand spin classes, for allegedly using popular music in their on-demand videos without the proper licenses.

The Peloton situation actually provides some valuable lessons for every business owner, regardless of industry. But first, some background on what happened with Peloton, at least according to the plaintiffs’ one-sided view in the Complaint. For those who have not seen their advertising barrage, Peloton is a public company that sells high-end stationary bikes and treadmills. How high end? A spin bike will set you back a couple thousand dollars, but luckily you can finance it with low low monthly payments over 36 months (just like your TV, couch, cell phone, pure-bred poodle, and anything else these days). The treadmills are even more expensive at something like $5k, but the lawsuit is about the spin bikes.

Why would someone pay $2000+ for a stationary bike when you can buy a great one for $300-400 on Amazon? I have no idea. But one of Peloton’s central marketing points is a subscription service (for a separate monthly fee) that will give you access to streaming fitness videos, spin instruction, competitions, and other content that simulates an in-studio workout from your mid-town high-rise apartment or summer chalet or weekend home in the Hamptons. At least according to the commercials.

If you have ever been to a spin class at the gym, you know that the instructor’s playlist is a big part of the experience. The instructor plays a list of songs for the workout session that are generally synchronized to the tempo of the current workout intervals. For example, if the instructor wants the class to sprint at 110 RPMs on a flat road (meaning easy resistance), then she may play something fast and upbeat to get the class going. If the session calls for hills at 60-70 RPMs and heavy resistance, then she may play something slower and heavier to match the workout. Peloton offers a library of pre-recorded workout sessions that it streams to subscribers and like the in-gym spin classes, the recordings feature an instructor with a playlist taking the participants through a particular class. The problem – according to the lawsuit – is that Peloton does not have permission to use the musical content in its workout videos. In the world of copyright law, a company must have the proper license for commercial use before it can use music as part of its business. In the case of videos synchronized to music, the law requires what is called a “sync” license that permits that particular song to be used with a specific video. Apparently Peloton failed to secure those “sync” licenses for at least some of the videos that it broadcasts. Copyright law also provides for punitive damages for willful violation of copyright, and Peloton may be facing a steep price tag if the court determines that Peloton’s failure to secure licenses was a deliberate decision. Which it very well may have been, as it is surprising to think that a company that size missed a rather obvious music licensing issue.

Whatever the merits of the litigation, and whatever the outcome, there are some important takeaways for all business owners from this lawsuit. Even if you have never been inside a spin studio, even if you do not use music at your business, there are still valuable lessons to be keep in mind:

  1. Trying to save a few bucks at the beginning may cost you big bucks later on. The most common reaction online to the Peloton lawsuit is that “how could a big public company not have seen this coming?” Peloton grew quickly, and it may be possible that the company deliberately skipped paying licensing fees at the beginning to save money, but this attempt to scrimp at the outset may end up costing millions down the road. This is why no matter your size, it is important to properly budget and anticipate all expenses. For example, talk to an insurance agent you can trust and get the right amount of insurance coverage for your business. Buy workers’ compensation insurance. Comply with MIOSHA regulations. Hire a lawyer to draft a proper business agreement between you and your partner to reflect your respective rights and obligations to the company. Do not co-mingle personal and business bank accounts. You get the picture – a cheap shortcut now can come back and cost you much more money in the future. It could even potentially sink your entire business.
  2. What may seem like common sense to you may be illegal. You may be thinking – but if I buy a CD at the store or a song from iTunes, don’t I own the music? Can’t I play it for whoever and whereever I want? It may be common sense that you own something that you buy, but it is not always true, especially in the modern age of digital media. With respect to music for example, you are often buying a license for personal, in-home use. Say you have a bar or a restaurant, and you decide to play your own iPod playlist over the speakers for atmosphere. Without a separate license, you just violated the music studio’s copyright and can be sued. Or, if you decide to start your own weekend DJ business using your old LPs. Same thing – the CD you buy at the store to listen to in your car does not give you the right to play that same CD at a wedding for money. Sound confusing and counter-intuitive? It may be, but it also protects the rights of the music publisher and keeps the cost of CDs and iTunes singles accessible to the general public. The bottom line is that you need to consult with a professional about all aspects of your business to make sure you are doing it the right way, and to ensure compliance with all applicable laws. And the right professional will identify all the relevant issues, not just the obvious ones.
  3. You are never too big (or too small) to be sued. You might also be thinking, oh who cares, I run a mom-and-pop gas station/grocery store/bar and no one is going to sue me for playing my CD collections over the speakers. Or you might think, my business partner is my friend, he will never sue me. My employees are all like family, right? Wrong. Just one example is a string of lawsuits filed against nightclubs for playing songs without the proper commercial license in 2016. From my own experience as a business litigator, there are far too many cases where business partners break up and decide to sue each other because they never had a written agreement. Actually, one of the major reasons to create a separate legal entity for your business – like an LLC – is to anticipate lawsuits and to protect your personal home, car, and bank account in case of unanticipated trouble. Luckily, creating the right corporate entity and maintaining corporate formalities to ensure protection are not particularly complex or expensive endeavors, and should be done by all business owners.
  4. Anticipate and budget for lawsuits as the cost of doing business. You can take all of the precautions in the world, hire the best attorneys, and run a flawless business. You are still going to get sued. That’s the reality of doing business. There may be a disagreement with a supplier over the quality of the product supplied. One of your workers may get injured on the job. Or, a vengeful ex-partner or employee may decide to use entirely frivolous litigation to harass and extort you. Thus, it is critical to budget for such eventualities just like you budget for utilities, rent, or salaries. I have counseled numerous businesses who think that they can handle a legal proceeding in-house, and end up creating more trouble for themselves that then costs MORE money to untangle down the road. It is a great idea to treat litigation as just a cost of doing business, set aside some funds each month, and have a lawyer on retainer, so that when you do get sued, your attorney can jump on the case right away and minimize any damage.
  5. Hire the right lawyers to review all aspects of your company. Of course, you have to have the right people for the job. Contact a knowledgeable and well-rounded business attorney like me to provide a consultation for your business. That way you can make sure that you have all the right documents, that you have secured the necessary licenses, and that you are fully prepared in case something goes sideways. And remember, there is always someone willing to do it cheaper. Choose your professional wisely!

Contact attorney Dan Artaev today at dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law

4 Must Have Legal Documents for New Business Owners

Whether you are a one-man computer whiz coding the next blockbuster iPhone app, or a five-employee manufacturer making parts for a Tier 1 auto supplier, you need basic corporate forms to protect your assets and investments. A limited liability company (or LLC) is the preferred way to organize and obtain this protection. Plus, if you ever apply for a business loan or decide to sell your business, having an organized and up-to-date corporate record book will do wonders to enhance your value. After all, when Google offers to buy your start-up for a couple million dollars, the transaction will go much smoother with an up-to-date Operating Agreement, corporate consents, assignment documents, and annual statements for the buyer to review.

I recommend the following 4 must-have corporate documents for every business owner:

  1. Articles of Organization –  If you registered your LLC with the State of Michigan, you already filed the basic Articles as part of your initial paperwork. These Articles effectively form your LLC, set forth its name, purpose, duration, and designate a registered agent (or contact person) for your company. Even if you are a sole proprietor, it is worth spending the initial $50 filing fee (and the $25 renewal each subsequent year) to create an LLC. That way, your personal assets are separate from your business assets and are protected from both creditors and litigants.
  2. Operating Agreement — While all LLCs have Articles of Organization, not all bother to have their attorney draft an Operating Agreement. An Operating Agreement sets the rules for how the company is run, including how many votes it takes to make a decision, who owns how many shares, and how shares are valued and transferred. This is a critical document that can prevent many disputes down the line, especially when there are multiple owners involved.
  3. Written Consents/Resolutions – Written consents, or resolution, are records of the business’s decisions. The Operating Agreement will set forth the process for making decisions through written consents (as opposed to meetings). Even if you are the sole owner, it is critical that you draft and maintain written consents whenever the LLC acquires property, makes a distribution, sets a salary, has its annual meeting, or takes another material action. Written decision records help prevent future disputes and also ensure ongoing protection of the corporate form for the owners.
  4. Assignments – If you decide to transfer shares to another LLC member or give an investor an equity stake, the share sale must be documented in an Assignment. The typical assignment document will set out the purpose of the transaction, the value exchanged, the final distribution of shares, and will address the assumption of company liabilities (if any) by the transferee. It may be tempting to simply exchange cash for a promise of membership, but a formal assignment will clearly define the parties’ rights and responsibilities, which will prevent future disputes.

Establishing the proper corporate forms and drafting the paperwork need not be expensive. An attorney will generally be able to register your LLC and draft an operating agreement for a couple thousand dollars. Written consents and assignments can then be created on an as-needed basis. This up-front investment is well-worth the protection that it provides for your assets, as well as protection from disputes and even intra-company litigation down the road.

BONUS TIP – just as critical as a good attorney, a business owner should consult with a reputable insurance provider and a CPA. A solid insurance policy and a tax expert to review your financials will protect you from the unexpected and likely save you money in the process.

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com or 269-930-0254 to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law

Non-Compete vs. Non-Solicitation: Key Differences that Every Employer Must Know

No matter what industry you are in, you have probably encountered non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. In Michigan, standard pre-employment paperwork often contains obligations for the employee not to compete with the employer (non-compete) and not to solicit the employer’s existing customers or other employees (non-solicitation).

Although these obligations may be in the same boilerplate paragraph of the documents your employees signed before or on that first day of work, non-competes and non-solicitation covenants are very distinct in terms of their enforcement by the courts. As an employer, you should understand the different goals of these two types of covenants, the differences in the applicable law, and also understand that Michigan courts will not automatically enforce an agreement just because an employee signed it.

For the uninitiated, a non-compete agreement obligates the employee to not “compete” with the employer’s line of business for a set period of time after leaving employment. The non-compete not only prevents direct competition (for example, an employee starting his or her own rival company), but also prohibits an employee from working for a competitor located within a certain area. By way of example, an employee working as a sales rep for a medical supply store might agree not to work for any competing medical supply store located within 100 miles of their current employer for a period of 1 year after leaving. In essence, the non-compete seeks to preserve the employer’s competitive advantage by restricting its employees’ ability to go work for a rival or to start their own competitive enterprise.

Because the non-compete restricts the free labor market, the Michigan Antitrust Reform Act of 1984 (MCL 445.774a) requires non-competes to:

  1. Protect a reasonable competitive business interest;
  2. Be reasonable in terms of duration;
  3. Be reasonable in terms of geographical area; and
  4. Be reasonable in terms of the the type of employment or business affected.

What is reasonable is a question of fact that depends on the scope of the restrictions and on the nature of the work to be restricted. For example, an agreement prohibiting a medical supply sales rep from competing for a year within 100 miles of his current territory is likely reasonable. However, the same agreement prohibiting the sales rep from working in the any medical-related field for 50 years anywhere in the world is probably not reasonable.

Also, the non-compete must protect a “reasonable competitive business interest” – meaning that agreements targeting back-room employees like maintenance or unskilled workers may be vulnerable to challenge because restricting those employees furthers no legitimate business interest. Before drafting and requiring a non-compete, an employer should ask themselves exactly what they are trying to protect. If the answer is something concrete like “customers” or “sales contacts” – then the agreement likely meets the reasonable competitive business interest criteria. If they struggle to come up with an answer or the answer is “I don’t want the employee working somewhere else” – then the agreement may not be considered reasonable and may not be enforced.

A non-solicitation agreement on the other hand is a promise not to interfere with the employer’s actual business by stealing their customers and employees. The non-solicitation is easier to enforce than a non-compete for several reasons. First, a non-solicitation agreement is NOT subject to MCL 445.774a because it does not “expressly prohibit[] an employee from engaging in employment or a line of business after termination of employment.” Thus, the statutory “reasonableness” requirements set forth above do not apply. Second, the non-solicitation by its nature is directly tied to legitimate competitive interests. There is little question that a business’s customers and employees are valuable assets. To prohibit an existing employee from interfering with those assets is not much different than prohibiting stealing on the job. Third, a non-solicitation agreement will not apply to a lower-level employee because they are not as likely to have no reason to or opportunity to steal customers or employees. After all, a maintenance tech working at a manufacturing plant is not likely to quit his or her job to start a rival manufacturing plant and steal customers and employees. But a C-suite executive may very well become a direct competitor.

As an employer, it is always a good plan to update your on-boarding documents and employee handbook to ensure that you know exactly what your employees are agreeing to. It is grave mistake to simply print some forms from the internet and cobble together a policy that does not make sense in the context of your business. After all, it pays to have a solid, enforceable document. If there are problems, it is better to find out that the document is problematic before it is held unenforceable by the courts.

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com or 269-930-0254 to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law

Terror From Beyond the Grave: 5 Critical Mistakes To Avoid When Terminating Your Company

It is a classic horror movie plot line. The good guy finally killed off that scary monster/evil janitor/gremlin. Hooray! Triumphant, the hero turns his back to celebrate with fellow survivors when SUDDENLY the monster/evil janitor/gremlin rises from the dead to take down that one final victim! In the business world, if you do not take the proper steps to terminate your corporate entity and ensure that it is “dead AND buried,” (which I swear is a real term of art) the entity can come back from the grave. The undead entity will then cause all kinds of problems and could even result in potential personal liability for the unwary business owner.

First, termination does not mean a business has failed. Even if your company grows and is successful, there may be a time that you need to terminate its existence. The most common example is when you sell your business. If it is an asset sale, the buyer purchases the real estate, equipment, customer lists, intellectual property, etc., but leaves the corporate entity for the seller to dispose of.

Second, before we get to termination, I assume you have read my other posts and properly incorporated your business. You also should have had your attorney draft the initial corporate documents. These documents will often contain the rules and procedures for the terminating the corporate entity. Following these internal rules and procedures is critical to a successful dissolution and wind-up.

Finally, and without further ado, the following is a list of the 5 most common missteps to avoid when terminating your business:

Mistake #1 – Not consulting with an attorney and an accountant. Termination is not as simple as filing a form with the State of Michigan. There are multiple considerations that control the process and are unique to your business. For example, what do your bylaws or articles of organization say about termination? Do you need unanimous consent of the equityholders or a majority vote enough? Are there tax implications and personal tax liabilities to consider? What about the timing of any liquidation distribution? Only a professional can provide fact-specific counsel for your particular situation.

Mistake #2 – Confusing “dissolution” and “winding-up.” Although both terms refer to the termination of a corporate entity, the processes are different and controlled by different statutory provisions. Dissolution is something that is triggered by an event – for example, a unanimous vote of the LLC members or a bankruptcy as set forth in the bylaws. Winding up on the other hand refers to the process of liquidating the corporate entity. In other words, dissolution is the process of making the company “dead” – whereas winding-up is a process to ensure that it is “buried.”

Mistake #3 – Assuming that dissolution alone protects you from personal liability. Dissolution alone is not enough to protect a business owner from creditors and litigants. In Michigan, the law permits a dissolved corporation to “sue and be sued in its corporate name.” MCL 450.1834(e). Same goes for a dissolved LLC. MCL 450.4805(3). Moreover, improper dissolution could lead a court to conclude that the corporate form was a sham designed to elude creditors, and result in a court order to “pierce the corporate veil.”

Mistake #4 – Failing to follow the statutory requirements. Whether your company is organized as a for-profit corporation, a non-profit, or an LLC, there are specific statutory requirements for the termination process. For example, Michigan law requires an LLC to provide specific information in its certificate of dissolution. MCL 450.4804. This is critical because proper dissolution is a statutory prerequisite to winding up the LLC’s affairs (meaning liquidation). See MCL 450.4805 and 450.4806. In other words, failure to carefully follow the dissolution process risks a subsequent argument that the wind-up process was invalid and the liquidation was illegal. Note also that there are separate laws that govern corporations and LLCs and it is imperative that you follow the correct procedure for your specific type of entity.

Mistake #5 – Neglecting creditors for the benefit of shareholders. Terminating a company does not relieve the company or its equity holders from liability for debt obligations. If you are unable to pay your lender or cannot pay an adverse judgment, then you should consider filing for bankruptcy. In the process of a normal dissolution and liquidation, Michigan law presupposes solvency and mandates that creditors get paid first. MCL 450.4808(1)(a). And of course, government tax obligations must be paid even before the other creditors. MCL 450.4808(2).

Dissolving and winding-up your business is a complex process that requires consultation with a professional. Failure to ensure that the company is “dead AND buried” presents many risks going forward and can even lead to personal liability for the owners.

Contact attorney Dan Artaev today at dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Categories
business law

Starting a Business? Choose Your Organizational Structure!

Every business owner needs to incorporate. Forget about sole proprietorships or a partnership — running your business without formally organizing is like driving without insurance: You will be OK so long as you don’t get into an accident. But when someone rear-ends you, you will be in dire financial straits regardless of who caused the wreck.

Incorporation is “insurance” that will protect your personal assets (your house, car, bank accounts, 401k) from financial risks associated with running a business. The rule is that creditors and plaintiffs cannot come after your personal assets to satisfy a business debt or liability. There are of course exceptions to this rule, called “piercing the corporate veil.” But many business owners ask: Should I register as a corporation? Non-profit? LLC? PLLC?

As with all of legal questions, the answer is “it depends on the facts.” Your attorney and accountant will help you decide what works best in your particular situation. However, here is a basic overview of the four most common entity types in Michigan:

  1. For-Profit Corporation – The Michigan Business Corporation Act sets out the rules for corporate formation and the default provisions for corporate governance. Usually, an attorney setting up the corporation will draft two documents: (A) Articles of Incorporation, which is the basic form filed with the State of Michigan creating the corporation and (B) the Corporate Bylaws, which is an internal corporate document that sets out the corporation’s management, number of shares, stockholders, Board of Directors governance, and various other provisions. There are also various sub-classes of corporations that differ for tax purposes–for example an “S-Corp,” but you will need to consult with your accountant to determine eligibility. Corporations have been around for a long time and are generally a good choice for business owners seeking to set up a tried-but-true business structure – one that is supported by decades of case law and statutory gap-filler provisions. But again, whether a corporation is the right choice is a decision to be made only with the assistance of your legal and financial advisers
  2. Nonprofit Corporation – Michigan also has a Michigan Nonprofit Corporation Act that governs the creation of non-profit entities. Nonprofit status should not be confused with “tax-exempt”–whether an entity is considered “nonprofit” is a matter of Michigan law, while it is the federal government and the IRS that determine “tax-exempt” status. Consult with your accountant on all tax related matters! Generally, if your intent is to create a corporate entity for charitable or other non-commercial purposes, the non-profit corporation may be the best way to maximize the relevant tax advantages. From a legal standpoint, a nonprofit is created in the same manner as a for-profit corporation, with certain exceptions–for example, a charity must be registered with the Michigan Attorney General. And again, if you seek tax-exempt status, you must file the appropriate paperwork with the IRS. Click here for a detailed guide on forming a nonprofit corporation in Michigan.
  3. Limited Liability Company – This is a relatively new type of entity created through the Michigan Limited Liability Company Act in 1994. An LLC is the preferred corporate form for many small businesses due to its simplicity and modern approach to pass-through taxation. Indeed, a single-member LLC enjoys the same single taxation as a sole proprietorship, as well as the protection of the corporate form without some of the extraneous formalities of a corporation. While simple, an LLC must still file Articles of Incorporation with the State of Michigan and draft an Operating Agreement that sets forth the rules on how the LLC is run. Even when running an LLC, it is critical to observe the corporate forms to maintain limited liability and avoid the dreaded “piercing of the corporate veil.”
  4. Professional Corporations and PLLCs – Michigan Law requires certain professionals (such as physicians, dentists, lawyers, and certified public accountants) to incorporate as professional entities. Generally, a professional corporation is similar to a regular for-profit corporation and a PLLC is similar to a regular LLC. The most important distinction for a professional corporation or PLLC is that the professional remains personally liable for their own misconduct or negligence. However, the other members of a PC or PLLC remain protected from liability for the misdeeds of a single member. Thus, while professional incorporation as a solo practitioner is not a given, multiple-member entities should definitely consider the advantages of statutory liability protection.

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com or 269-930-0254 to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law

Why Annual Meetings Are Critical to Protecting Your Personal Assets From Business Debts.

As a new and growing business owner, you read my articles on incorporation and essential corporate documents, and took my advice to heart. You retained an attorney and accountant, drafted and filed the basic forms, and Small Business LLC is up-and-running. However, you are not done — there are important steps to take for you to maintain the benefits of the “corporate form” and keep your personal and business assets separate. Take special note if you are a single member LLCs or single-shareholder corporation. When you are busy running your business, it is easy to overlook corporate formalities — yet whether you are a solo shop or a 50 employee corporation, these formalities are equally as necessary and important to protect your investment.

The exception to the general rule that an owner’s personal assets are protected from a business’s creditors and litigious plaintiffs is called “piercing the corporate veil.” This term of art originated from one of those archaic law school cases that no one remembers, yet practitioners and courts frequently use this phrase today. The idea behind “piercing the veil” that a business owner cannot abuse the corporate form and use it to commit fraud. If a plaintiff convinces a court that the defendant corporation or LLC is a sham, the plaintiff gets to “pierce the veil” and proceed against the business owner directly and personally, as if the corporation or LLC never existed. 

Of course, there is always the possibility that an unpaid creditor will accuse your company of fraud and abusing the corporate form even in instances of legitimate business insolvency. After all, everyone wants to get paid, and if there are significant personal assets shielded by the corporate form, it may just be worth the time and money to argue.

Here are some basic tips on how you can maximize the protections of the corporate form and mitigate the risk that a court will order “piercing the veil”:

  1. Separate bank accounts – This might seem basic, but it is astounding how many business owners co-mingle corporate and personal funds. It is absolutely critical that you maintain separate accounts and keep track of business income and expenses separate from your personal expenses. When examining whether the corporation is a sham, this is one of the first factors that a court will consider. In other words, pay your mortgage from your personal account and buy inventory using the company credit card (as opposed to your personal VISA). 
  2. Have an annual meeting – If you are organized as a corporation, an annual meeting is required by law. While it is not required for LLCs, having an annual meeting (and keeping a written record that such a meeting was held) is another important factor that courts will consider when deciding whether the owner is entitled to continuing “corporate veil” protection. 
  3. Keep a binder with written consents and meeting minutes – Your bylaws or articles of organization likely provide for the ability to make corporate decisions through written consents. Your attorney can help you prepare these documents, but generally these “consents” are written evidence that a particular transaction, such as a sale of real estate, a purchase of assets, an appointment of an officer, was authorized by the company. It is good practice to pick a shelf in your office and maintain a three-ring binder with all the consents arranged chronologically. If the company holds a meeting (whether annual or otherwise), it is best practice to record meeting minutes and keep them in the same binder as the written consents.
  4. Maintain good standing with the State of Michigan – This is the easiest requirement to observe, yet it is frequently overlooked. Each year, the State of Michigan requires business owners to file an annual statement form and a fee. Failure to do so for a period of time is not only evidence that might cause you to lose corporate protection, but actually can cause your entity to be automatically dissolved. While it is possible to bring your company back into compliance through retroactive payments and filings, the process costs extra fines and needlessly exposes the business owner to losing the benefit of corporate entity protection.

Contact attorney Dan Artaev today at dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Categories
business law

5 Often-Overlooked Essentials When Selling Your Business

You finally got that phone call from the California venture capital firm that wants to buy your  start-up for a couple of million dollars. You are eager to sell and use that money to pursue other projects and passions. The attorneys and accountants have been retained, and the Asset Purchase Agreement has been drafted. 

But while the attorney drafted the proper asset descriptions and indemnification clauses, and the accountant has allocated the purchase price for the taxes, has your team addressed these five often-overlooked essentials? After all, the sale of a business is much more than just signing the papers and turning over the keys.

  1. Is the buyer hiring the existing employees? When transferring the assets of a business, one can easily overlook the employees who operate those assets and make the business run. Assuming that the buyer is buying the employees together with the business is a grave (and potentially costly) error. Most employees are at will and may walk out from their job if you spring a “surprise” acquisition on them one morning. This may especially be devastating in an industry like manufacturing, where qualified employees are difficult to find. To mitigate that risk, the buyer should provide offer packages to all current employees at least a few days before the sale. As a seller, it may benefit you to make a small monetary or personal gift to some of the long-time or more senior employees to thank them for their years of service and to throw a transition pizza party for the crew. Remember that the sale will be a personal and emotional event for those who work for you. While you are selling the machines and office furniture, the employees make the business run.  
  2. Are any key services performed by a family member or by the seller him or herself? In small businesses, owners often rely on their family members (or themselves) to perform certain key services (like quoting prices or estimating inventory) without a formal employment relationship. The seller should disclose any key services done by family members so that the buyer can make adequate provisions to hire someone to perform those key services. After all, the goal is to keep the business going after the sale and to provide for as few delays as possible. 
  3. What happens to the invoices and receivables received after closing? Continuing in the ordinary course of business, there will be both invoices and checks that the buyer receives post-closing. Who is responsible for the invoices for inventory received pre-closing? Who gets the checks for pre-closing product? And what about any open purchase orders – are those being assigned? To prevent future conflict, all of these topics should be addressed before the money is wired.
  4. What about the building? If the seller owns the building and is selling that building with the business, the transaction is relatively straight-forward. But if there is a lease, the seller must obtain landlord’s consent before assigning the lease. Alternatively, the buyer must enter into a new lease that starts on the day of the closing to ensure a smooth transition and continued operations.
  5. Have the customers been informed? It is a mistake to assume that the business’s customers will simply continue doing business with the new owner. Business is as much about relationships as it is about the numbers. The buyer and seller should discuss a transition plan with respect to existing customers and ensure that these valuable relationships are preserved going forward.

Of course, these are just some examples, and there will be other key topics specific to the nature of your business and to the transaction. 

Contact attorney Dan Artaev today at dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Exit mobile version