Tag: small business

Categories
Uncategorized

Is a Bad Review Defamation? Protecting Your Business Reputation Online.

Following my previous article about online defamation, business owners frequently ask me whether they can “sue” Facebook or Yelp or Google, etc., to get a negative review removed. Or whether they can “sue” the poster for “reputation damages.” This is especially common in the trucking industry, where Carrier411 hosts a platform that allows brokers and customers to review carriers. Often times, a dispute or a misunderstanding between a carrier and a customer leads to a “report” or a bad review on Carrier411 that causes frustration and may even result in lost business.

A negative review by itself is not always defamation. To win on a defamation claim in court, you need to prove: (1) a false and defamatory statement about the plaintiff; (2) unprivileged publication to a third party; (3) fault amounting to at least negligence; and (4) actionability per se or the existence of special harm.

What does this all mean for the business owner faced with a negative review?

  • First, a successful defamation claim requires a false and defamatory statement. This is the most commonly misunderstood element, but it is absolutely critical. A negative review – even if the business owner has a different side of the story, or does not agree with it – is not actionable unless it is actually false. A statement of opinion – even if negative – is not a false statement of fact because there is no such thing as a false opinion. That is an important difference, especially in the age of social media. A person may go on your restaurant website and freely post something like “I hate the atmosphere and I did not like the food here at all.” That is not defamation, even though it is a negative review. Rather, it is a statement of opinion. A good test is to ask: how am I going to prove that the statement is false? What types of evidence will I introduce to refute the “facts” that were posted? There is no evidence that you can introduce to refute a statement of opinion – in other words, the customer’s perception of atmosphere and the food is their own. If they did not like it, then it is their opinion, and they are entitled to it. Also, the statement must be defamatory, that is injurious to your business reputation. A statement that is false, but is not negative or otherwise critical of your business is not actionable. For example, if a review says “This restaurant is located in midtown Detroit,” when in fact the restaurant is downtown, the statement is false, but not defamatory.
  • Second, there must be unprivileged publication. “Publication” just means dissemination to others – meaning third parties. Of course, if something is posted online, it is published. “Unprivileged” means that the statement is not made in the context of a protected communication, such as a legal filing with the court, a police report, or some other type of special protected communication.
  • Third, the false statement must be made with at least negligence. That simply means that the person making the statement either knows that it is false or does not bother to try to find out before publishing. Even if a person publishes a false statement about your business, they may not be liable if they consider it true based on a reasonable inquiry.
  • Fourth, there must be an element of damages. In business cases, this element is usually satisfied automatically, as damages to business reputation are considered actionable per se. However, actual damages are still critical and must be proven – otherwise you may end up recovering only nominal damages. While punitive and exemplary damages, as well as attorney fees, are available under MCL 600.2911, there are no guarantees that they will be awarded. A case is always more persuasive if there are actual damages that are proximately caused by the negative post, review, or other published statement.

Even if you can prove the four elements, there are practical factors to consider before filing a lawsuit. Are you prepared to bear significant litigation costs – thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars? Are you prepared to invest time away from your business to prove your case? Never treat litigation as an investment opportunity because no business owner makes money paying their attorney and spending time in court.

The good news is that there are other options besides litigation that you can discuss with your attorney. Often times, an informal discussion with a dissatisfied customer can solve the issue. A cease-and-desist letter can be effective as well. If the potential damages are significant, pre-suit mediation may be the most cost effective option to resolve the dispute.

One final note – in Michigan, defamation claims must be brought within a year of the event. Other states may have different deadlines, but if you think you may have a claim, talk to an attorney sooner rather than later.

Dan Artaev is an experienced business attorney who advises a number of domestic and international businesses on various topics, including defamation. Email us or call us to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2024 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.-

Categories
Uncategorized

But Your Honor, He Said a Bad Thing About Me on Facebook: Business Defamation Claims in the Age of Social Media

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

It is 2024 and every business has an online presence – whether through a website, on Google, or on social media. It is more important than ever for business owners to know what can and cannot be said (i.e. posted) regarding their business online. In other words, can you sue to get that negative review off of Google? Or what about that irate ex-employee that keeps posting false information to your Glassdoor page? Can an overzealous freight broker’s post against a trucker on Carrier411.com lead to a lawsuit?

In a recent Michigan case that involved Carrier411, Penguin Trucking Inc. and E.L. Hollingsworth & Co., faced off in a business defamation case. The two companies were contracted for the same job at different rates by an outside third party. However, by the time the two companies found out about the scam, Penguin Trucking had already had the freight in its possession and was unable to make a deal with E.L. Hollingsworth for them to reconcile and both deliver the freight.

Since Penguin Trucking already held the freight, they decided to enter into a deal directly with the end customer for the delivery. Shortly thereafter, an E.L Hollingsworth employee posted a scathing report on Carrier411.com, a trucking monitoring service website. The employee wrote that Penguin Trucking “held [the] load hostage,” attempted “in-transit agreement modification,” and accused them of “unethical or deceptive business practices.” In any industry, potential customers are reluctant to do business with companies that have negative reports written about them, like those written on Carrier411.com. In the trucking business, Carrier411 reviews are especially crippling and can even destroy a smaller or startup business. Penguin Trucking experienced these adverse effects first-hand when it lost out on a contract with a shipper based on the FreightGuard. In litigation, Penguin Trucking proved not only that the online statements were false, but that the loss of the shipper contract was directly linked to the Carrier411.com review. Penguin Trucking was awarded $612,400 in damages for this lawsuit.

Michigan’s laws are clear about what constitutes defamation and what does not. Most other states have similar laws that protect against false statements that damage a business’s reputation. There are four elements to a defamation claim in Michigan:

  1. A false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff;
  2. An unprivileged publication to a third party;
  3. Fault amounting at least to negligence on the part of the publisher; and
  4. Either special per se harm or actual damages proximately caused by the statement.

For a more in-depth look at what each element means and requires, check out my latest article about protecting your online reputation.

If someone is posting intentionally false information about your company on the Internet (including a false FreightGuard report on Carrier411) you have a right to defend your company. An experienced attorney can help with various options short of litigation, such as sending a cease-and-desist letter and negotiating a resolution on your behalf. If litigation does become necessary, we can also provide the necessary support and consultation to take your case before the proper court.

Have more questions? Contact our firm by email or call us today to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2024 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Are Cryptocurrency Games of Skill Legal in the United States?

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Real-money games of skill are unregulated and thus legal in the majority of the United States. While there are specific best practices for launching your project, games where skill is the predominant or material factor in deciding the winner are generally not considered prohibited gambling. With the rebound of cryptocurrency markets in 2024 and a renewed interest in NFTs, is it possible to launch a skill-based game that uses cryptocurrency as opposed to fiat?

The answer is yes, but there are several caveats, warnings, and areas to be aware of. Cryptocurrency is subject to a patchwork of state-by-state regulations, as well as overlapping oversight from federal regulatory bodies including the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”). However, the first consideration is whether the game is regulated as “gambling” under any state or federal laws.

Games of skill vs. games of chance

First, in any real-money game of skill, the initial and primary consideration is the effect of skill vs. chance. It does not matter whether the players are competing for fiat dollars, cryptocurrency, or gold bars. State anti-gambling laws generally require the wager and receipt of “something of value” – the definition is purposefully broad to ensure anti-gambling regulations cannot simply be evaded by substituting cash for gold, tokens, or something else of value. Clearly, cryptocurrency is something of value and therefore falls within the same regulatory framework as cash games.

In-game currencies and securities regulation

Second, cryptocurrency-based games are subject to some unique considerations and developing laws.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has taken a particular interest in cryptocurrency-based projects in the United States. Initial coin offerings (or ICOs) have been on the SEC’s radar since at least 2017. ICOs were essentially a way for companies to raise funds by selling self-created crypto tokens without complying with securities registration requirements. The SEC took (and continues to take) the position that where a crypto asset (whether it is token or an NFT) meets the definition of “investment contract,” the asset is a security and is subject to the regulatory and registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. Companies that sell unregistered securities face stiff penalties and injunctions from the government, as well as “disgorgement,” which is just another way of returning funds to the buyers.

If your cryptocurrency skill-based game uses a widely circulating coin like BTC or ETH or SOL, then you are in a better position because the SEC generally targets the issuers (not the users) of a particular crypto asset. However, if you are planning to launch your own in-game token for players to use as an entry fee and to receive as a prize, you need to ensure that the token has sufficient non-investment utility. In other words, a company may use its own in-game currency if the in-game currency is considered a “utility token” – meaning there must be a use outside speculation and expectation to profit from the efforts of others. If there is true “utility,” the token will not be considered a “security” under the Howey test. Such an analysis is complex, multi-faceted, and requires a legal opinion from qualified counsel.

Patchwork of state-level regulations

Certain states have also enacted various laws targeting the sale and exchange of virtual assets. Some have taken a light approach – for example, Michigan has updated its criminal code to include the definitions of cryptocurrency and Distributed Ledger Technology to ensure that the criminal statutes applicable to fraud, theft, and forgery include the new technological representations of value. See MCL 750.157m(c), (f). Other states, like New York, Florida, and Minnesota, have enacted licensing schemes with respect to virtual currency business activities and updated their money transmission laws.

Moreover, states have their own sets of securities laws. Those are not necessarily preempted or superseded by federal law. In other words, even if a crypto asset is a utility token under the Howey test and is not considered a security under federal law, a state regulator may come in and enforce state-level “blue sky” laws. As just one example, the state attorneys general of Alabama, Kentucky, New Jersey, and Texas recently coordinated an unregistered sale of securities enforcement action against Slotie.com, which was selling gamified NFTs that represented virtual plots of land in a Las Vegas-style gambling metaverse.

Gaming in 2024 is full of innovative possibilities, especially as the crypto markets rebound, government regulation across the world matures, and public interest in alternative assets increases. However, there are many legal considerations to evaluate. The qualified and specialized attorneys of Artaev at Law stand ready to help with your next project.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2024 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

What Every Business Owner Must Know About Cryptocurrency Systemic Risk

Whether your business is a full-scale investor in cryptocurrency and blockchain technology or whether you are simply using cryptocurrency to diversify your balance sheet or facilitate international transactions, you are assuming systemic risk. Systemic risk is basically the risk that the “system” in question will fail. The 2008 financial crisis is a recent example of the financial system’s failure due to overleveraged institutions and opaque and risky lending practices. Cryptocurrency and blockchain tech are quickly growing and becoming an integral part of the global financial markets – essentially evolving into another system. For example, sophisticated investors can self-direct their retirement accounts into cryptocurrencies and stake their entire savings on this growing tech.

Risk is part of any business. However, so is effective risk management, which particularly critical in the blockchain/cryptocurrency context, which operates outside of the safeguards and regulatory oversight common to traditional financial institutions. At the same time, existing tax, securities, commodities, and finance regulations still apply to crypto, and compliance is critical to the smooth functioning of your business. At a minimum, any business involved with blockchain tech should involve an experienced business attorney to develop their internal risk management protocols and have a plan for legal compliance, as well as systemic risk.

1. Existing Tax, Securities, and Other Laws Still Apply to Cryptocurrency.

First, and foremost, cryptocurrency is an asset and blockchain enterprises are businesses that are subject to general state and federal laws. While there is no central authority in the United States responsible for policing crypto markets, that does not mean that crypto business operate independent of the law. Government regulators are playing catch-up, and have repeatedly asserted their authority over cryptocurrency and related tech under existing laws. For example, 2020 was the first year that the IRS asked taxpayers about their crypto holdings. Enforcement units are gearing up to address tax evasion and close the multi-million dollar gap between actual income and what is reported to the IRS. The SEC and CFTC are also stepping up enforcement actions to head off fraudulent activity and lack of transparency in certain financial offerings. The Department of Treasury (through FinCen) is also stepping up oversight to enforce existing anti-money laundering frameworks.

The existing regulatory framework is far from perfect and is not well-suited to the unique characteristics of cryptocurrency. For example, why are some ICOs (initial coin offerings) securities, but established coins like Bitcoin and Ethereum are not securities? Capital gains taxes apply to cryptocurrency and stablecoins. But the IRS has not issued any guidance on NFTs. Are they going to be taxed like “property” or like collectibles, art, gold bullion, or something else? Will NFT tax rates depend on what the NFT is supposed to represent?

Stablecoins are a whole separate issue. Recently, a group of Treasury, SEC, and CFTC officials urged Congress to pass legislation to regulate stablecoins. In the “Report on Stablecoins,” the group noted existing SEC and CFTC authority to regulate these markets, but urged reform and legislation that is specific to the new technology.

For investors and innovators, legal compliance is the essential first step. Nothing stifles innovation like an IRS audit or an SEC investigation. Make sure to consult with an experienced attorney for guidance on the latest state of the quickly changing law in this area.

2. Decentralization Does Not Mean Risk-Free or Safe.

Second, the decentralized nature of cryptocurrency and blockchain tech in general lends itself to a false sense of security among investors and businesses. Some crypto advocates consider regulation unnecessary because blockchain tech is “decentralized.” The public ledger system purportedly means total transparency, equity, and fairness. In reality, a decentralized system is not immune from tampering or malfeasance.

For example, blockchain at its core is software that depends on coders and engineers upgrading the “chain,” fixing bugs, and making improvements. Someone somewhere determines forks and chain upgrades. Also, what about miners? What precludes off-chain influence (i.e. bribes) to miners that would impact the whole chains or cause them to verify certain blocks or transactions out of sequence?

Stablecoins are considered “safe” because the tokens are purportedly backed by fiat or equivalent reserves. But there is a lack of transparency between various stablecoins, different liquidity thresholds between reserves (for example, cash vs. money market vs. short term bonds), and variable redemption mechanisms and minimums. Additionally, is your stablecoin of choice based on a public blockchain or a permissioned blockchain? Permissioned blockchains limit access to the blockchain, providing more certainty as to who is responsible for the chain’s operation and integrity. At the same time, they reduce transparency and accountability.

Further, the federal government does not insure stablecoin or cryptocurrency deposits. If you stake cryptocurrency for a return, you are not insured or protected against the coin’s failure, a run, or illiquidity. If you are using a stablecoin to facilitate DeFi transactions, have a plan in case of network problems, chain disruptions, or backing failures. For instance, use several stablecoins to diffuse the risk.

As illustrated by the recent examples of the SQUID token and the Evolved Apes NFT, crypto tech is full of bad actors. The chain itself is not immune from malfeasance. Any business that fully depends on the integrity of the blockchain for its day to day operations must have safeguards. At a minimum, a crypto company must have a robust security system and team dedicated to detecting network health and chain anomalies. Financial hedging that diffuses the risk over multiple chains, cryptocurrencies, and other assets is also critical. Finally, established and documented due diligence protocols to assure investors, regulatory authorities, and lenders are a must.

3. Do Not Take the Internet For Granted.

Third, there is an inherent systemic risk to anything that depends wholly on the operation of the internet. Outages of certain sites or even network-wide service providers are not uncommon. Just recently, Facebook and Instagram were down for almost a full day. Comcast made headlines for its network outages across the United States on November 9, 2021. Directly related to cryptocurrency markets, exchanges like Coinbase have connectivity issues and other disruptions in times of market volatility. This can have direct adverse financial consequences for a business that depends on access to the crypto markets.

Due diligence protocols and internal safeguards are essential in this context. Offline copies of books and ledgers, at least backing up transactions history on a periodic basis. If you are storing crypto, look into offline (hardware) storage options for your code and data. Consider hedging and diversification.

Most important of all, have a plan. Cybercrime and ransomware insurance options are also worth looking into. Crypto and blockchain are existing, but are not without substantial risk. While government regulators are playing catch-up and are urging Congress to pass a risk control framework, legislation is not an instant process. In the meantime, plan for systemic risk as part of your business plan.

Want to know more? Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

A Guide to Getting Your Skill-Based Real-Money Game Approved in the United States.

Skill-based real-money gaming has been a popular form of entertainment across the world for hundreds of years. From Roman legionnaires wagering on an early version of backgammon to $5 eight-ball games at your local pool hall, skill games have always attracted players looking for a chance to win real money. With smart phones in every pocket, skill-based gaming has entered a new era where anyone with an internet connection can play various money skill games through their phone or computer and stake anywhere from $0.25 to hundreds of dollars on the outcome.

Gaming is a rapidly growing industry and the skill-based real-money market is no exception. Indeed, there is already at least one publicly-traded California-based company (Skillz.com; SKLZ) investing substantial resources in the real-money skill-based U.S. market. However, any sort of real-money gaming business implicates federal and state-level regulation. While a government license is not necessary in most states, your game must still pass private sector review. Apple’s App Store is indispensable in the current market; advertising through social media like Facebook is another must. Banking and payment processing is likewise an integral part of your ability to run a business.

I have advised a number of companies, both international and U.S. based, on the legality of their skill-based real-money games. Through Artaev at Law, I have prepared detailed memorandums and analysis for a number of companies, as well as provided consultation to investors seeking more information about the real-money skill-games market. As a game developer, here is what you need to know:

1. Get Your Game to the Players.

If you were to get into the full-scale casino gambling market, you would have to comply with stringent state-level regulatory requirements, pay substantial application and licensing fees, and otherwise deal with an intricate governmental regulatory framework. Further, in the few states where casinos are even legal, there is only a limited number of licenses that a state will issue. In other words, it is impossible. But real-money skill gaming operates outside the gambling regulatory framework, which means you don’t have to go through a government licensing or regulatory approval process to offer your product (in most states).

Instead, real-money skill game providers find themselves faced with so-called private company gatekeepers. The popularity of real-money skill gaming is in large part due to the ubiquity of the smartphone. Apple’s App Store is the only practical way to get real-money skill games onto iPhones (no, people will not “unlock” their iPhones to sideload your real-money skill game, especially when the App Store already has a robust selection of these games that are easy to download and use). Google’s Play store does not currently allow real-money skill games, so there developers must either provide sideloading options or use a Progressive Web Application (PWA).

The bottom line is that developers must pass Apple’s “gatekeeping” to even get their app on the market. That means complying with the App Store Review Guidelines. Section 5.3.4 is particularly important:

5.3.4 Apps that offer real money gaming (e.g. sports betting, poker, casino games, horse racing) or lotteries must have necessary licensing and permissions in the locations where the app is used, must be geo-restricted to those locations, and must be free on the App Store.

Apple considers real-money skill games to fall into this category, even though skill games do not depend on chance like the “sports betting, poker, casino games, horse racing” examples. This guideline can be distilled into three requirements: (1) The app must be legal where you are offering it; (2) The app must be geo-restricted to only those locations where it is legal; and (3) the app must be free.

The first requirement is the most important and the most confusing for app developers. How do you demonstrate that your app has “necessary licensing and permissions” if the states where you are offering your real-money skill games do not regulate such games? This is a situation where a legal opinion or memorandum from an experienced gaming attorney is helpful. In general, such a legal opinion will describe your game, explain how the game fits within existing federal regulations, and then present a state-by-state analysis (supported by applicable statutory and case law citations) to show that the skill game does not violate those states’ anti-gambling prohibitions or any other law.

The second requirement of geo-restriction is self-explanatory. Your app can only offer real-money gaming if the user verifies their location in a state where such gaming is legal. You can still offer practice or play-money games without geo-restriction (or if the user does not want to or cannot verify their location).

The third requirement is that the app must be free. Section 5.3.3 of the review guidelines further clarifies that “in-app purchase” cannot be used to purchase credit or currency for use in the real-money gaming app. That means that you will need to set up some sort of external mechanism for deposits, link the user’s existing account and balance to the app, and ensure compliance with the external payment processors’ requirements.

Once submitted, the review process can take between several weeks to more than a month. A lot depends on whether your app is similar to other apps already approved or whether it is something completely new. Other factors, like the reviewer or the law firm reviewing the legal analysis may also impact the timeline.

2. Advertise Your Game.

Advertising is critical to your app’s success and online advertising platforms have special rules for real-money games. Social media companies like Facebook and Twitter require prior approval and permission before running your gaming ad. The process is similar for both platforms and generally involves filling out a questionnaire, selecting the geographic areas you are targeting, providing a link to your app’s website, and submitting a legal opinion that your app comports with the law where it will be advertised. Google and YouTube (owned by Google) do not currently allow real-money skill game advertising.

This process may be a bit more lengthy than getting approval from the App Store. Depending on the nature of your product, your location, and the platform, the process may take several months. The social media platform may also come back with additional specific legal questions for your counsel to answer. The level of follow up and scrutiny is hard to predict because the social media companies farm out the review to outside law firms, which have their own standards and review processes.

3. Set Up Your Payment Processor and Bank.

Once your game is live and advertised, it’s time to start making money. There are a lot payment processors out there (PayPal, Square, etc.) and each has their own set of rules and guidelines for business accounts. The federal Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act applies to payment processors, so they must be especially careful not to facilitate illegal gambling activities. Credit card companies present another potential obstacle, as credit card companies often lump skill-based gaming with gambling into the 7995 merchant code.

For example, after states started rolling out regulated sport-betting options, Visa issued guidance that made its payment services available for “all transactions that are consistent with local, federal, and international laws.” Visa introduced new 7800-series merchant codes for legal gambling, but none of those codes apply to real-money skill gaming transactions. Practically, this means that skill-gaming transactions may still fall under the blanket 7995 code and Visa may not authorize the transaction. Nor does Visa issue an MVV (merchant verification value) for 7995 merchants, meaning that skill-based real money gaming companies are limited as to their direct-pay options.

This essentially requires skill-game companies to explore options through payment providers like PayPal. Provided you are based in the United States and can link a bank account, the process should be straightforward. If you are based in another country however, there is a whole another set of hurdles to overcome.

There’s More.

Getting your game approved, advertised, banked is only the first step. You will also need robust terms and conditions that govern your relationship with your users, which is especially critical when dealing with real-money gaming and facing potential payout disputes. A privacy policy is also a must, especially if you are offering your game internationally. Then there is the issue of taxation and whether you should be paying excise tax on skill-based game wagers. Real-money skill-based gaming is a hot market, but requires experienced legal counsel to get through these various issues.

Have more questions? Do you need help getting your app through the review process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Ask the Crypto Tax Lawyer: Offsetting Capital Gains Through Loss Harvesting.

Update: As of November 10, 2021, Congress is in the process of considering legislation to preclude loss-harvesting through cryptocurrency sales. Congress is also considering other amendments to the Tax Code and other laws to address cryptocurrency specifically. As this is a rapidly developing issue, it is critical that you consult with a tax attorney or other professional about your specific situation and the current state of the law before making any transactions or business decisions.

More than half-way through 2021, cryptocurrency remains an extremely popular investment. Although volatile and subject to unpredictable regulation (yes, that means China), the market has experienced substantial growth. Exchanges like Coinbase and integration with PayPal make owning, trading, and speculating in cryptocurrency easy. Sophisticated investors have even added cryptocurrency into their self-directed retirement portfolios, banking on the continued growth and popularity of the decentralized exchange medium.

As I have previously written, the IRS is keeping a close eye on cryptocurrency investors, transactions, and markets, looking to capture taxes on hundreds of millions in underreported or unreported income. In other words, crypto taxes are going to be an issue for many in the coming tax years, especially after the Biden administration’s mandatory $10,000 or more transaction reporting rule goes into effect in 2023. However, with proper planning and strategy, there are ways to reduce your tax liability even if you are planning to liquidate your crypto positions in the near term.

As a basic matter, know that the IRS classifies cryptocurrency as “property,” which means that it is subject to capital gains tax. General capital gains reduction strategies work for cryptocurrency as well as they do for more traditional property like investment real estate, stocks, and bonds. For instance, waiting at least 365 days to sell lets you take advantage of the lower long-term capital gains tax rate. Selling in a lower income year where your overall income puts you in a lower tax bracket is another strategy.

One advanced tax strategy involves taking advantage of the so-called wash sale rule. Or rather, it is taking advantage of the fact that the wash sale rules does not apply to cryptocurrencies (yet). Under Treasury Regulation 26 CFR 1.1091-1, an investor cannot sell “stock or securities” at a loss, use the loss to reduce taxable income, and then immediately repurchase the stock or security. Under the wash sale rule, there is a 30-day waiting period before purchasing the same or substantially the same stock or security – if an investor repurchases the security within the 30-day restricted period, the loss will be added to the cost basis of the repurchased security and reduce capital gains on the sale of the repurchased security, but it will not be treated as an investment loss to reduce general tax basis. In other words, you cannot manufacture losses in a bear market to reduce your taxable income that you receive from other investments, rentals, or wages.

The IRS has been clear that cryptocurrency is treated as “property” for tax purposes. However, whether it is a “stock or security” remains unanswered and both IRS Notice 2014-21 and the recently amended FAQ are silent on the issue. There is no express definition of “stock or securities” for the purposes of the wash sale rule. Looking elsewhere in the Internal Revenue Code, the definitions of stock and securities in various other sections include traditional shares, notes, bonds, and the like. Indeed, in 1988 the United States Tax Court adopted a narrow interpretation of the Code, holding that stock options were not considered “stock or securities.” Gantner v. Commissioner (91 T.C. 713 (1988). Congress responded by amending the wash sale rule to expressly include stock options, but still did not enact a definition of “securities” for the purpose of the rule.

Based on the current Code and Regulations and the lack of IRS guidance on the issue, there is a strong argument that cryptocurrencies are not “stock or securities” for the purposes of the wash sale rule. What this means is that crypto investors can take advantage of loss harvesting to accrue losses and use those losses to offset income. For example, if you buy one Bitcoin for $30,000 and the next day the price drops to $20,000, you can sell the Bitcoin at a loss of $10,000, “harvest” the loss, and repurchase the Bitcoin for $20,000 shortly thereafter. You still own 1 Bitcoin, but now you have accumulated a loss that you can use to offset capital gains income.

If your losses exceed capital gains, you can use up to $3,000 of loss to reduce regular income. Any excess loss can be carried over to future years to offset future gains.

At the same time, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and certain United States courts have ruled that cryptocurrencies are indeed “securities” within those Commissions’ regulatory scope. This regulatory effort was generally to stem the fraud and abuse through “initial coin offerings” or ICOs that sought to evade strict regulations designed to protect investors. While there is currently no indication that the IRS would consider cryptocurrency as “stocks or securities,” there is precedent for that conclusion from these other agencies and remains possible that the IRS could issue supplemental guidance and interpretations to that effect.

At the time of this writing, the IRS has not issued any such interpretation and savvy investors can consider the loss harvesting strategy if appropriate for their particular situation. As with all cryptocurrency transactions, good record keeping is paramount. It is especially critical to have accurate records to substantiate your losses if you are repurchasing the same crypto. Good and accurate records are the best tool in defending your position to the IRS, should the IRS take a position and disallow your claimed losses.

Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Ask the Crypto Tax Lawyer: How Can I Reduce My Crypto Taxes?

Important: The information in this article applies to individual investors and LLCs that are taxed as pass-through entities. The rules are different for corporations and LLCs electing to be taxed as a corporation and are not addressed here. This article is for informational and promotional purposes only and, as always, you should consult with a professional about your specific tax situation before taking any action.

Despite its name, cryptocurrency or “crypto” is not really currency. For tax purposes, it is treated as “property,” which means it is taxed similar to stocks and bonds. As I previously wrote, buying and selling crypto is subject to capital gains tax. Paying for goods and services with crypto is likewise subject to capital gains tax. Exchanging one crypto asset for another is a taxable event as well.

“Crypto tax” has a nice ring to it, but it is nothing more than the application of ordinary capital gains tax to cryptocurrency transactions. The most important aspect of crypto investing – whether individually or as part of a business – is good record keeping. Exchange platforms like Coinbase can generate basic reports to use at tax time. But remember that you must also keep records when you pay for goods and services with crypto or receive payments in crypto. For tax purposes, when you pay someone in Bitcoin or Ethereum, the IRS considers that you have sold the cryptocurrency for cash (and realized a capital gain or loss). When you receive crypto as payment for goods and services, you acquired ordinary income in the amount equal to the market value of the crypto at the time of the transaction. In short, keep good records, you will need them.

What are some top strategies to minimize capital gains tax from cryptocurrency investing? As with any other investment, a little bit of planning can help you minimize your tax bill at the end of the year.

  1. HODL. The capital gains tax rate is different for short-term and long-term gains. Purchasing and selling crypto within a 365 day period is considered the short term, and any gains during that period are taxed like ordinary income (i.e. wages). Short-term crypto income will be taxed between 10% and 37%, depending on your tax bracket. On the other hand, selling crypto more than a year after buying it lets you take advantage of the lower long-term capital gains rate. Depending on your income level, long-term capital gains are taxed at either 0%, 15%, or 20%, with most people falling into the middle 15% bracket. For example, if you are paying a 22% rate on ordinary income, but are in the 15% bracket for long-term gains, you will end up with significant savings on your tax bill.
  2. Offset. Of course, not everyone buys crypto for long term investing. If you are trying to time the market and profit from crypto’s volatility, holding to gain favorable capital gains treatment may not be a feasible strategy. Tax law generally allows offsetting capital gains with losses, but the strategy does have limitations. Losses must first be used to offset gains of the same kind – for instance, short-term losses must be used to offset short-term gains, and only if you have excess short-term losses can you shift them over to reduce your long-term capital gains. If you still have remaining losses, you can take an ordinary income deduction of up to $3,000 for the tax year and retain the balance to offset next year’s gains and income.
  3. Decrease Taxable Income. Like with other “property,” you can time your sales to your specific income situation. You may want to sell appreciated crypto when you have less income than you anticipate in the future. Or, you may accelerate 401k/IRA contributions to take advantage of the up-front tax break. Health Savings Account contributions are another taxable income reduction alternative, especially if you are anticipating significant health care expenditures in the near future. For businesses, business expenses can be used to reduce taxable income, but be sure that the expense is both “ordinary” and “necessary.” For example, renting a building and paying electricity costs for your Bitcoin farm are probably ordinary and necessary expenses. Also, be careful to properly categorize any business start-up costs, assets, and improvements, which are treated as capital expenses (and therefore are different than your ordinary business expenses).
  4. Set up a self-directed IRA. Self-directed IRAs or SDIRAs are little-known but powerful investment tools for the sophisticated investor. They allow you to take full control of your retirement investments and direct the funds into non-traditional assets. Commonly used for holding real estate, private company stock, and precious metals, SDIRAs can certainly be used to buy and hold crypto. Most bank-managed retirement plans can be converted to the self-directed kind, but there are additional fees and special rules about what your SDIRA can and cannot do to retain the tax-favored treatment by the IRS. In essence, the SDIRA can be used to convert all or part of your retirement portfolio into an investment “checkbook” that you can then use to purchase and hold assets like crypto for the benefit of your retirement.
  5. Move, gift, donate, or leave it to your heirs. Depending on your situation, there are other options that may be used to optimize your tax situation. If you are in a state that imposes its own income tax, you may want to consider moving to a no income tax jurisdiction. Or potentially incorporating and locating your Bitcoin mining company there. Likewise, depending on your future goals, retirement situation, and estate planning, it may be advantageous to shift some of your crypto holdings (especially those where you are looking at a significant gain) towards those objectives. For example, if you leave your crypto portfolio as part of your estate, heirs would receive a “step up” in basis and receive the crypto at the fair market value at the time of death. This significantly reduces their tax bill and something to consider if a crypto portfolio is part of your estate planning.

There are other strategies that may be available based on your particular situation. Remember to keep good records, plan ahead, and get a professional to answer all your crypto tax questions.

Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Real-Money Skill Gaming in the U.S: Is Your Game More Fantasy Sports or Pure Contest?

In 2021, there are many opportunities to play games for real money online, even if your particular state does not offer full-scale online casino operations. Daily Fantasy Sports (or “DFS”) is one hugely popular entertainment option. Real-money pure-skill contests are another. Video game tournaments, leaderboards, and prize pools are also available, as well as countless other options. Entrepreneurs all over the world want to enter the red-hot United States gaming market, but need to understand the legal nuances in order to effectively distribute their product and avoid legal issues with regulators, banks, and app platforms like the Apple App Store.

With skill-based games, it is important whether your game is more like fantasy sports or whether it a pure-skill contest. This distinction is critical because it determines where your game is legal (and whether you need a license) – and also affects your tax obligations to the IRS.

The following chart illustrates the three categories of games and the applicable regulations:

Description/type of gameCategoryRegulations
Players determine the amount of the wager and may apply certain level of skill to increase odds of winning (like hit or stay in blackjack), but odds always against the player. Winner is determined primarily by chance or chance is the dominant factor in determining outcome. Game is similar to a casino game like slots, blackjack, keno, or bingo. Game is a poker-like game. Game features a random mechanism, like a shuffled deck of cards, roll of the dice, or a spinning wheel. Bet is on the result of a single athletic competition, event, or performance of a single player.GamblingHighly regulated, illegal and criminalized activity (without a license)in all 50 states. Federal law also applies, including the monetary transaction restrictions through the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (“UIGEA”).
Players pay an entry fee, and then use research, data analysis, or other skill to build a team or portfolio to compete against other player-chosen teams or portfolios. Points or scores assigned based on real-life performance. Player does not control the performance of the players, stocks, currencies, or other portfolio components. Real-world events determine outcome. Similar to fantasy sports or a fantasy league. Prize pool must be known and fixed ahead of time.FantasyFantasy sports are expressly excluded from the scope of the UIGEA. Fantasy sports and leagues are permitted in about 80% of the states, but license and revenue tax is required in some. IRS views fantasy wagers as gambling bets and no different than sportsbook betting for tax purposes. Potential exposure to excise tax for providers.
Players pay an entry fee into a sports tournament or skill contest for the chance to win a prize (whether cash or otherwise) based on their own participation. Players determine the outcome through pure skill, such as strength, speed, agility, mental knowledge, mental quickness, or other physical or mental factor. Chance has minimal or no role in the outcome. Head-to-head games of timed solitaire, chess, checkers, blockbuster, Tetris-like puzzle games. Trivia contests. Most video game tournaments. Golf or tennis tournaments, hole-in-one contests.Pure Skill ContestUnregulated and not considered gambling in about 80% of the states. Regulated pursuant to license or outright prohibited in the remaining states. Not regulated under federal law. The IRS does not consider entry fees or skill wagers to be gambling bets.
Copyright 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All Rights Reserved. May not be reproduced without the express written permission of the author.

As a gaming company providing a new product, you obviously want to steer clear of classification as a gambling game. Unless you are a licensed casino (or working in partnership with a licensed casino) in one of the few states that have legalized online gambling, real-money gambling games are illegal. Not only do you risk fines and prosecution from state and federal law enforcement, but you will not be able to pass Apple or Google’s app vetting process, advertise on Facebook, or use a mainstream payment processor like PayPal.

Skill-based real money games are those where the outcome is not determined by chance. These games fall either into the “fantasy sports” or “pure skill contest” categories. In either category, the argument is that where chance is not a dominant factor, the game is skill-based and falls outside the definition of regulated “gambling.” Many real-money skill-based gaming platforms have adopted this “if it is not prohibited, then it is legal” approach to offer their products in about 80% of the United States. But there is a difference between the so-called “fantasy sports” and “pure skill contest” categories. The first difference is regulatory – state law treats “fantasy sports” and “pure skill contests” differently.

To fully understand the difference, it is important to know that the “it’s not gambling” argument is not new. In the early 21st century, it was widely used by online poker providers and then daily fantasy sports operators. Recall that between the early 2000s and 2011, Texas Hold’em became huge in the U.S., helped by online pioneers like PokerStars and PartyPoker that allowed anyone to play online poker from anywhere. ESPN was airing the World Series of Poker as part of its routine sports coverage. The 2006 James Bond franchise reboot Casino Royale even focused on high-stakes no-limit hold’em (as opposed to Baccarat in Ian Fleming’s original book treatment).

The primary argument for legality was that poker is a game of skill, not chance, and therefore not gambling. Advocates pointed to the fact that skilled poker players were consistently able to beat their opponents, even though the game did involve the element of chance with a random shuffle of a card deck. In response to growing concern about unregulated real-money poker, a number of courts concluded that chance played a significant role in the outcome and Texas Hold’em is indeed gambling. The federal government took further regulatory action by enacting the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (“UIGEA”). The UIGEA essentially killed off any off-shore poker and other grey-market online gambling operations by targeting U.S. banks and payment providers and prohibiting them from facilitating wagering transactions. Those providers that continued to offer U.S. players real money poker games were shut down through federal law enforcement action on so-called “Black Friday,” April 15, 2011, and their executives charged with a number of felonies, including money laundering and fraud.

Daily Fantasy Sports emerged as an entertainment alternative around 2007 and relied on the same “it’s not gambling” argument as poker. Players would stake real money for a chance to play in a fantasy sports contest, where they would set a daily lineup of their own fantasy team and compete against others for the highest score. The highest score or scores would be awarded cash prizes. DFS relied on the definition of “bet or wager” in the UIGEA that expressly excluded fantasy sports contests. But, just because DFS is not illegal under the federal UIGEA (and MasterCard or Discover can process the associated wagering transaction) does not mean it is automatically legal. Some states concluded outright that DFS is “gambling” and is illegal. Others enacted legislation that DFS is not gambling. And some have done nothing at all. Thus, DFS offerings vary state-by-state: as of the date of this article, DraftKings and FanDuel both offer DFS in 41 of the 50 states. But DFS law is far from settled and remains in a state of flux; for example, in New York, DFS was authorized by the state legislature, but a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the law is pending on appeal. Texas is another example – in 2016, the Texas attorney general issued an opinion that DFS is illegal gambling, but both FanDuel and DraftKings continue to offer DFS in Texas pending the final outcome of various lawsuits.

On the other hand, games that are head-to-head contests of pure skill are legal in most states because they fall outside the state’s definition of “gambling.” These games – whether online or in person – allow participants to pay an entry fee and compete for a prize (monetary or otherwise). Even if the game is played on a smartphone, it is no different than paying a fee to play in a money tennis or golf tournament. Or paying an entry fee to participate in an arm wrestling contest at the state fair. In fact, certain states expressly exclude so-called “bona fide contests of strength, skill, or speed” from the definition of gambling, provided that the only persons making the wagers are the participants themselves. But although the analysis seems straightforward, providers of pure-skill contests disagree about where exactly real money games are legal. Various platforms have different lists of “restricted jurisdictions,” demonstrating their different tolerance for risk, and that the law remains unsettled in this area.

The second difference between fantasy and pure skill is tax treatment. Under the Internal Revenue Code, gambling winnings are taxable income, but may be offset by gambling losses. In 2020, the IRS decided that wagers made on DFS constituted a “wagering transaction” (i.e. gambling) under Section 165(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and the Tax Court agreed. This ruling was consistent with another 2020 internal IRS memo that concluded DFS wagers were subject to an excise tax, which is normally applied to wagers made at sportsbooks. The IRS’s analysis and conclusion that DFS is essentially the same as sports gambling has significant legal implications. Not only does it potentially expose DFS providers to millions of dollars in unpaid excise tax liability, but it is also an indicator of how the nature of the game may determine the outcome of “is it gambling” analysis. A game could very well be “gambling” for tax purposes, but at the same time “not gambling” under a state’s definition of “gambling.”

The skill-based gaming market is an attractive, fast-growing industry in the United States. However, it is also plagued by an uncertain legal landscape and inconsistent treatment at the federal and state level. Tax implications are also something to consider when designing your game. Whether you are a start-up or a well-established company looking to introduce a new game product, Artaev at Law can provide you with consulting and legal analysis required to do it right.

Have more questions? Do you need help getting your app through the Apple, Google, or Facebook review process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

What Should You Know Before Buying Into a Business? 5 Key Considerations for the Informed Investor.

Photo by Lukas on Pexels.com

Buying into a business can be an exciting next step in your career and present uncapped opportunities for growth. It can be especially lucrative from a financial perspective, as well as the professional allure of working for yourself. For example, if you are a doctor working for a clinic, you may be given an opportunity to buy into as a partner. Or, as an employee you may be presented with an option agreement that lets you purchase a membership stake in your employer. Note that this discussion is limited to privately held companies – if you are buying stock in a publicly-traded company (or receiving stock options as part of your compensation) or otherwise investing in an SEC-registered security, you may encounter different issues.

Here are 5 key considerations when faced with a (private) buy-in opportunity:

1. Retain an attorney to represent you. Buy-in options often come from a boss or trusted partner with whom you have an existing relationship. You may even be friends outside of work, which may make you reluctant to involve an attorney. However, you owe it to yourself to treat this as a business deal – because it is a business deal – and it is better to get professional advice now, rather than try to undo something years down the road. There are countless court cases that develop from one person trusting the other too much, people taking advantage of each other, or even a fundamental miscommunication or difference in expectations.

2. Review the operating agreement or the bylaws of the business. As part of your fundamental due diligence, you must ask for the basic formation documents. For a corporation, the foundational document is called the bylaws and for a limited liability company (LLC) the document is called the operating agreement. This document describes the rights and obligations of members, distributions, voting, buy-sell rights, mandatory offers to sell in situations like death, divorce, or insolvency of a member, and other important provisions. Be especially careful if you are buying a minority stake, which does not give you voting control If the company is governed by a majority vote and one person owns the majority, it is effectively at the control of that majority shareholder. Make sure you know what your rights are as a minority shareholder before you invest – you certainly want to avoid a situation where you are “frozen out” or otherwise oppressed, with no remedy other than potentially going to court.

3. Do not assume that you will receive distributions just because you are now part owner. As a shareholder or equity owner, you are also sharing in the losses of the business, as well as its gains. Just because you paid $50,000 into the business, you are not guaranteed a return or any profit at all. Again, it is important to understand the operating agreement or bylaws of the business. When are distributions paid? Monthly? Yearly? Who decides how the gross income of the business is allocated? What happens if the business loses money? Are the owners required to contribute additional capital? Can the majority owner issue additional shares and introduce new members?

Additionally, when you buy into a private company, you cannot cash out your investment very easily. Even if an operating agreement or bylaws include a mandatory sale clause, there is a matter of determining the sale price and the company may very well not have the assets to buy out your shares, even if you try to sell them back. Further, private companies restrict the ability of its owners to sell their shares to third parties or on the open market. In other words, an investment in a privately-held company is an investment for the long-haul, and you should be financially and psychologically prepared for that fact.

4. Get familiar with your new tax status and obligations. If you were a W-2 employee, your tax situation is relatively simple. But if you switch to partnership status, suddenly you will be responsible for paying your own taxes (quarterly), calculating the right amount of self-employment tax, and setting aside sufficient funds for future tax obligations. You will likely receive a new document from the business – a K-1 form – which will change the way you do taxes. Also, any retirement contributions (401k, IRA, etc.) will need to be reassessed in light of your new partnership status. It may be a good time to consult with an accountant as well.

5. Take the time to do your due diligence. Because you are likely dealing with a familiar person when buying in, you may feel pressure to act quickly or forgo asking the tough questions. Again, this is a business deal and a significant financial obligation that you are assuming. Just because your boss assures you that “this is a great opportunity and we will be millionaires” does not make it so. In addition to reviewing the business forms, you should ask for and review (with your lawyer and/or accountant) the financial documents like profit and loss statements, assets and liabilities, projections, and the business plan. After all, you would not buy a house without an inspection and a walkthrough, nor would you buy a car without test driving it first. Even if you think you know the business from working there as an employee, ownership is a different game and it is in your best interest to gather as much information as you can before making a significant financial investment.

Business ownership presents an exciting opportunity. As long as you are proceeding patiently and consulting outside professionals, you will be able to make a fully informed decision. And remember, even if presented with an option to buy-in, it does not mean you have to take it now or even take it at all. It is called an “option” because it optional and should be exercised only if it is in your best interest.

More questions? Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.


© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
independent contractors

Are Non-Compete Agreements Enforceable Against Independent Contractors in Michigan?

Photo by energepic.com on Pexels.com

This is one of those gray legal areas where the answer is “it depends on the facts of the situation.” Previously, I wrote about the basics of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements that are becoming increasingly common in all industries. At their core, non-compete agreements restrain the free labor market, and are therefore analyzed under the Michigan Anti-Trust Reform Act (“MARA”) (MCL 445.774a), which sets out a four-factor “reasonableness” test for the agreement. To be enforceable, the non-compete must: (1) Protect a reasonable competitive business interest; (2) Be reasonable in terms of duration; (3) Be reasonable in terms of geographical area; and (4) Be reasonable in terms of the the type of employment or business affected. Although the four-factor test in MARA expressly refers to “employer” and “employee,” lawyers and businesses frequently cited the same test when evaluating non-competes in other relationships, such as between two sophisticated business entities or an independent contractor.

In a 2017 opinion, Innovation Ventures v. Liquid Manufacturing, the Michigan Supreme Court clarified that the MARA test only applies to employment relationships. A different test applies to commercial agreements between sophisticated business entities. The case involved the manufacturer of 5-Hour Energy, and the Court looked at the plain language used by the Legislature to determine that the test does not apply to agreements between businesses. The Court further explained that MARA does not set forth a test for commercial agreements, but instead instructs courts to look to federal anti-trust law for similar legal analysis. The applicable test is the so-called “rule of reason,” which can be summarized as whether, under all relevant facts, the covenant unreasonably restrains competition. While the test may seem similar to the MARA four-factor analysis, it is different because it focuses on the reasonableness of the effect on the free market, rather than the impact on the restrained party.

What about independent contractors? Can a hiring party insist on a non-compete as part of the independent contractor agreement? And if so, what are the parameters for a valid non-compete for an independent contractor? First, parties are generally free to contract for anything, and so an independent contractor may certainly agree to a non-compete clause as part of their contract. Second, the non-compete will be evaluated under the same “rule of reason” as an agreement between two sophisticated commercial entities. This is because an independent contractor is not an employee – thus MARA’s four-factor test does not apply. Where MARA does not apply, the Legislature instructs courts to look at federal anti-trust law. Thus, the outcome is the same as with commercial contracts under Innovation Ventures. That means the rule of reason applies and the court will look at the effect of the restraint on the relevant market.

In applying federal anti-trust law, there is also a concept called a “per se” anti-trust violation. A “per se” violation is conduct that violates Section 1 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act by its very nature and does not require proofs of the actual anti-competitive effect or the relevant market. Simply put, a “per se” anti-trust violation is one where there is no redeeming competition-facilitating effect. A classic example in the employment arena is the low-wage hourly worker non-compete. A restraint on an $11-per-hour janitor precluding him or her to work for a competitor serves no legitimate purpose whatsoever and is clearly abusive. A court will not enforce such a “per-se” violation. The independent contractor analysis would be similar – if there is no legitimate pro-competitive justification for the non-compete, it may not be enforceable.

One final word of warning. If you are a business considering or using non-compete clauses in your independent contractor agreements, some courts consider such clauses indicative of an employment relationship. If an individual or government agency (like the worker’s compensation agency) challenges your classification, a non-compete clause is evidence of control that weighs in favor of finding someone is an employee. And, if someone is misclassified as an independent contractor, there are a myriad of penalties, fines, and other problems that you may face.

Non-compete and non-solicitation clauses and contracts are becoming more and more standard. However, it is a mistake to blindly use them for all your employees or independent contractors. Each situation warrants its own analysis. Otherwise, your business risks not only losing non-compete litigation, but also risks other unintended adverse effects, such as a finding of an employment relationship where one was not intended.

More questions? Need a non-compete reviewed or drafted for your situation? Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.


© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

3 Common Mistakes that Compromise a Business’s Corporate Protection and Expose Your Personal Assets.

Businesses that commingle assets, forgo record keeping, official minutes, and fail to keep their registration with the State of Michigan up to date risk losing their corporate protections. In most cases, the corporate form limits your personal liability and insulates your personal assets from business debt – unless a creditor successfully argues that the corporate form is a sham and used to perpetuate fraud. However, this protection is not an absolute and there are many situations where that protection may be set aside and personal assets (the owner’s house, boat, car, bank account, etc.) are at risk.

Even if you run a perfectly organized business with current paperwork and a separate bank account, there are still situations where you are at risk of personal liability for your business debts. The following three scenarios are most common:

  1. Did you sign a personal guaranty for a business lease or a business loan? Personal guaranties (or guarantys) are additional collateral that you may be asked to execute as a prerequisite to a business loan or even a business lease. A personal guaranty is effectively an agreement that waives your corporate protection and allows a creditor to go after your personal assets directly. Because a small business does not have many assets to collateralize a loan or assure a landlord that obligations will be paid, you may be asked to sign the personal guaranty. Whether you accept that risk is up to you, but at a minimum you should read the document carefully and discuss it with your attorney so that you understand the implications. You may also be able to negotiate for a lease or loan without a personal guaranty, but in most cases you will need to provide sufficient collateral or other assurances to secure your obligations.
  2. Are you knowingly breaching a contact or a lease? Some business owners erroneously assume that because they have an LLC, they can ignore contracts or leases. For example, if your company signed a 3-year lease in a dying shopping center – what’s to stop the LLC from defaulting on the lease and walking away? A lawsuit can only reach the LLC, right? That’s not only wrong, but it is also a dangerous line of thinking that may put your personal assets at risk. A court will not allow the abuse of the corporate form to evade obligations or escape debts. Understand that corporations are created by statute – i.e. the law – to facilitate business. At the same time, the court system will not apply the law to facilitate a party’s evasion of its contractual obligations. If you are abusing the LLC to default on loans, other contracts, or lease obligations, a court may very well determine that you are abusing the system, pierce the corporate veil, and impose personal liability.
  3. Are you moving assets around to another company? You may also think that you can simply start over by forming a new LLC, transferring the assets of the old LLC to the new one, and leave the loans, contracts, and leases behind with the old shell of a company. But even if you declare bankruptcy for the old LLC, your assets are not immune from creditors. The bankruptcy proceedings allow aggrieved creditors to challenge any transfers made before bankruptcy as “fraudulent” and have them set aside for the creditor’s benefits. And even if your old business had no assets, a court may still impose personal liability and pierce the corporate veil if it is determined that your actions were for a fraudulent purpose – such as escaping a debt, contract, or lease obligation.

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com or 269-930-0254 to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Does Your Business Have a Pre-Nup? The Importance of Planning for Life’s Unexpectancies.

Nobody likes to plan for life’s unpleasantries, including divorce. While divorce remains an unfortunate fact of life, proper planning with your business attorney can help protect your business from the unexpected. This is particularly critical where a business has multiple owners, members, or partners.

In a recent case out of New York, a company’s three partners were shocked to learn that the fourth partner’s impending divorce would result in his ex-wife owning part of the business. Small businesses are particularly vulnerable to members’ interests becoming part of a divorce property dispute. And unlike blue-chip stock, who owns the shares of a small business has a direct impact on the day-to-day operations and decision making. In the New York case, the owners admittedly failed to plan for a divorce and ended up having to borrow $250,000 to buy out the divorcing partner.

However, with proper planning and consultation with a business lawyer, you can hedge against contingencies like divorce ahead of time. One such way is through a carefully-drafted Operating Agreement that expressly sets out what happens if a membership interest becomes subject to a divorce judgment. Common provisions grant the company a right of first refusal to buy out any sort of membership interest subject to transfer, and also set forth the rules for valuing such interest using either the Company’s books, a CPA, or an independent appraiser. Another common (and highly useful) provision prohibits a transferee of any membership interest from voting or otherwise participating in the Company’s affairs, until officially admitted as a “member” by the other members. Thus, even if a divorce decree awards a spouse part of the membership in the company, the spouse is limited to the economic benefit of such ownership until (and only if) the rest of the membership decides to allow the new member to participate in the actual business. Another planning tool is a separate buy-sell agreement, which sets forth the rules and conditions for each owners’ membership interest.

Divorce is not the only “D” word that a prudent business owner must plan for. Death of a member is another contingency that should be expressly addressed in a company’s documents. Disability or incapacity is another. Finally, a business should have specific provisions in place to address the potential of bankruptcy or insolvency.

The four “D”s–divorce, death, disability, and debt–are realities that no one likes to think about. However, planning for the bad as well as the good is a part of running a business. With a plan in place, a company will suffer much less disruption and uncertainty when the unthinkable happens. And that is good corporate governance.

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com or 269-930-0254 to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Exit mobile version