Tag: gaming law

Categories
gambling law gaming law internet law sports law

Regulatory Crackdowns Are Reshaping Sports Wagering.

Regulatory uncertainty in emerging gaming markets has proven itself to be a double-edged sword. On one hand, unregulated gaming products that do not squarely fall into the definitions of “gambling” or regulated fantasy sports offer greater accessibility, innovative entertainment, and lower fees to their customers. Such products include skill-based games, play-to-earn video games, peer-to-peer social wagering, and pick’em-style fantasy sports (most prominently championed by Underdog Sports and PrizePicks). On the other hand, pick’em fantasy sports has recently been under fire, as a number of states have either outright banned pick’em fantasy sports or are currently investigating them.

Pick’em As a Popular Alternative to Traditional Fantasy

Pick’em style fantasy sports found success in appealing to the younger, more casual player. Instead of assembling a roster, managing a virtual salary cap, and engaging in time-consuming balancing of performance vs. cost, the pick’em format simply awards points based on correct predictions of a better outcome. For example, the pick’em format will ask participants to pick an over/under point total between two outcomes or which player will score more points. This simpler and more straightforward format has enjoyed rapid success due to its accessibility and entertainment factor. However, state regulators have also cracked down on the format due to its functional resemblance to proposition-style sports bets.

Regulators Have Cracked Down on Pick’em in Late 2023 and Early 2024

As of the date of this article, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, New York, North Carolina, Virginia, and Wyoming have taken the position that pick’em fantasy sports offerings are illegal under state law. Wyoming (which legalized online sports betting in 2021) targeted leading pick’em operators PrizePicks and Underdog in July 2023 with cease-and-desist letters. High-profile regulatory actions followed in Florida, New York, and Michigan. Florida takes the position that fantasy sports have not been and are not allowed in the state. Michigan and New York have amended their daily fantasy sports administrative rules to prohibit “any contests that have the effect of mimicking betting on sports or that involve ‘prop bets’ or the effect of mimicking proposition selection.”

Other states joined the effort. California is currently in the process of investigating and opining on the legality of DFS in the state. Kansas became the latest state to issue cease-and-desist letters to at least six fantasy sports operators. Notably, despite having a well-articulated and public position on the legality of its offering, Underdog voluntarily left Kansas in September of 2023. PrizePicks continues to operate in Kansas.

After Florida targeted the three market leaders – Underdog, PrizePicks, and Betr – with cease-and-desist letters in September 2023, it appeared that the companies were eager to fight for and defend the legality of their offerings. This no longer seems to be the case and at least one operator (PrizePicks) just settled the New York State Gaming Commission’s allegations of illegal fantasy sports operations by agreeing to pay a fine of nearly $15 million and ceasing operations in New York.

While the settlement is limited to PrizePicks, its a potential blow to all the other pick’em operators, whose legal position has been that their products either operate within the boundaries of permissible fantasy sports or are not otherwise regulated by state law. As a side note, New York is unique in that the settlement with PrizePicks acknowledges the general legality of fantasy sports in New York pursuant to license. PrizePicks’ “wrongdoing” was ostensibly operating fantasy sports without a license (not that their pick’em product was per se illegal).

Novel Game Markets Remain Uncertain and Subject to Rapid Adverse Regulator Actions

In any case, the cascade of regulatory actions (and the speed with which investigations turned into cease-and-desist letters and subpoenas) highlights the uncertainty related to novel gaming products. For instance, PrizePicks operated in New York since 2019 under a “good-faith belief” (and presumably in reliance upon legal advice) that it did not need to obtain any sort of fantasy sports or other license from the state. PrizePicks likely relied on the common-sense conclusion that its offering was a game of skill and therefore unregulated under New York law. Yet PrizePicks had to essentially pay back all the revenue it made in New York and agree to exit the state.

Out of all the real-money gaming offerings in the market, skill-based real-money gaming still appears to be most accepted model. Skill-based real-money gaming involves players paying an entry fee and competing for a prize, with the outcome determined by the relative skill of the players as opposed to chance. Peer-to-peer social wagering leverages the skill-based aspect of predicting sports outcomes, but involves direct bettor-to-bettor competition as opposed to bets against the house.

While legally untested, the peer-to-peer model also appears to be more palatable to regulators, as Underdog Fantasy revised its player vs. house pick’em model to function as a peer-to-peer skill contest in Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Wyoming in response to collaboration with regulators in those states. Play-to-earn is a concept most associated with Web3.0 and video games where in-game assets have tangible out-of-game value. Interest in play-to-earn is surging, as the crypto markets recover and Bitcoin exceeds the $50,000 barrier.

As more states legalize gambling and especially sports betting, regulators are taking a closer look at potential competitors. Licensed heavyweights like DraftKings and FanDuel (and their lobbyists) are allegedly involved in bringing regulators’ attention to potential competitors, especially if those competitors are operating at higher margins due to lower regulatory costs.

A Detailed Legal Opinion is More Important Than Ever

The current regulatory environment in the United States highlights the importance of hiring experienced and knowledgable counsel as part of your team. What was permissible or at least tolerated by regulators a year ago may not be acceptable now. Further, more states are taking a position against unlicensed sports betting or fantasy products, even if those offerings are firmly grounded in sound legal arguments. Careful consideration, a legal opinion, and a detailed analysis are more important than ever to a successful launch, especially as payment processors, vendors, investors, and other third parties are going to be engaged in a lot more legal scrutiny.


The qualified and specialized attorneys at Artaev at Law PLLC know gaming law – email or call us to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, tax, or investment advice. Every situation is different and has its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2024 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
gambling law gaming law Uncategorized

Are Skill-Based Real-Money Games Legal in the United States?

The skill-based real-money game sector continues to grow in 2024, and yes, skill games are generally legal under the laws of most states. Risking money on games of skill has always been popular – from Mesopotamia, to Ancient Egypt and the Roman Empire, to your local pool hall. Now, with the ubiquity of the smartphone and internet access, skill-based real-money gaming is a widely available form of entertainment. The setup is familiar – pay an entry fee for a chance to compete for a prize. Top score takes the prize. There is also no shortage to game variety, although skill-based solitaire, bingo, and a blackjack-solitaire hybrid called 21 Blitz account for the vast majority of players.

Designing, distributing, and marketing real-money skill gaming apps continues to be a lucrative business model. But what are the legal and regulatory hurdles to distributing and marketing your product in the United States? There are many nuances, and given that each of the 50 states has its own set of laws related to gaming and gambling, hiring experienced counsel is a must.

IMPORTANT – Real-money games of skill are still illegal in some U.S. states, even though they are not games of chance (such as traditional gambling like blackjack, roulette, or slots). A lot depends on the particulars of your app or game, but it is a mistake to assume that all skill games are automatically legal.

There are three main obstacles to distributing a real-money skill game in the U.S.:

  • Second, the app must comply with state and federal law. Geolocation technology can be used to meet specific location requirements or restrictions. Additionally, Apple requires that any real-money gaming app comply with local laws where the app is offered, have the required licenses (or the aforementioned legal opinion), and be geographically restricted to those locations. Also, offering an app in a jurisdiction where it is illegal risks attention of local authorities or private litigation, which can result in fines, penalties, and closure of your particular game.
  • Third, as skill-based real-money gaming is unlicensed and unregulated, it is important to have robust terms and conditions and a privacy policy in place. These terms function as a contract between the gaming company and its customers, offering important rules and regulations, as well as disclaimers and liability limitations. Further, dispute resolution provisions like an arbitration clause and a class action waiver are important, but must be carefully tailored to be enforceable.

Real-money games of skill vs. gambling

You may have heard that real-money games of skill – like darts, pool, puzzles – are not prohibited or regulated in the United States because they are not “gambling.” The reasoning goes that if the outcome depends on skill rather than chance, then it is not regulated under state gambling laws. This is false. Each of the 50 states have their own statutory definitions, laws, and regulations applicable to gambling. The states also differ on how much skill is required to exclude a particular game from the “gambling” category. Most states rely on the “predominance” test, where skill must predominate over the chance element. Other states use the “material element” test, where a game is considered gambling if chance is a “material” element in the outcome. A few states use the “any chance” test – where if there is any chance element present, the game is considered “gambling” and may not be offered without a license.

There is also a distinction between fantasy sports-type games and pure contest games on both the state and federal levels.

Payment Processors and Due Diligence

Payment processors – companies responsible for money-in and money-out of your app – also have their own set of due diligence requirement. Most reputable providers will require the legal opinion, copies of the terms and privacy policy, and even may require an internal anti-money laundering (“AML”) policy. Under federal law, financial institutions and certain high-risk businesses (such as casinos) must have AML policies in place. However, experienced counsel can also help with craft a policy that balances the payment processor’s standards with practical considerations and costs facing any starting-stage business.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

This article was originally published in 2020, but has since been updated to reflect current legal and regulatory developments in the skill-based gaming area.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law gambling law gaming law internet law

Are Cryptocurrency Games of Skill Legal in the United States?

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Real-money games of skill are unregulated and thus legal in the majority of the United States. While there are specific best practices for launching your project, games where skill is the predominant or material factor in deciding the winner are generally not considered prohibited gambling. With the rebound of cryptocurrency markets in 2024 and a renewed interest in NFTs, is it possible to launch a skill-based game that uses cryptocurrency as opposed to fiat?

The answer is yes, but there are several caveats, warnings, and areas to be aware of. Cryptocurrency is subject to a patchwork of state-by-state regulations, as well as overlapping oversight from federal regulatory bodies including the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”). However, the first consideration is whether the game is regulated as “gambling” under any state or federal laws.

Games of skill vs. games of chance

First, in any real-money game of skill, the initial and primary consideration is the effect of skill vs. chance. It does not matter whether the players are competing for fiat dollars, cryptocurrency, or gold bars. State anti-gambling laws generally require the wager and receipt of “something of value” – the definition is purposefully broad to ensure anti-gambling regulations cannot simply be evaded by substituting cash for gold, tokens, or something else of value. Clearly, cryptocurrency is something of value and therefore falls within the same regulatory framework as cash games.

In-game currencies and securities regulation

Second, cryptocurrency-based games are subject to some unique considerations and developing laws.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has taken a particular interest in cryptocurrency-based projects in the United States. Initial coin offerings (or ICOs) have been on the SEC’s radar since at least 2017. ICOs were essentially a way for companies to raise funds by selling self-created crypto tokens without complying with securities registration requirements. The SEC took (and continues to take) the position that where a crypto asset (whether it is token or an NFT) meets the definition of “investment contract,” the asset is a security and is subject to the regulatory and registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. Companies that sell unregistered securities face stiff penalties and injunctions from the government, as well as “disgorgement,” which is just another way of returning funds to the buyers.

If your cryptocurrency skill-based game uses a widely circulating coin like BTC or ETH or SOL, then you are in a better position because the SEC generally targets the issuers (not the users) of a particular crypto asset. However, if you are planning to launch your own in-game token for players to use as an entry fee and to receive as a prize, you need to ensure that the token has sufficient non-investment utility. In other words, a company may use its own in-game currency if the in-game currency is considered a “utility token” – meaning there must be a use outside speculation and expectation to profit from the efforts of others. If there is true “utility,” the token will not be considered a “security” under the Howey test. Such an analysis is complex, multi-faceted, and requires a legal opinion from qualified counsel.

Patchwork of state-level regulations

Certain states have also enacted various laws targeting the sale and exchange of virtual assets. Some have taken a light approach – for example, Michigan has updated its criminal code to include the definitions of cryptocurrency and Distributed Ledger Technology to ensure that the criminal statutes applicable to fraud, theft, and forgery include the new technological representations of value. See MCL 750.157m(c), (f). Other states, like New York, Florida, and Minnesota, have enacted licensing schemes with respect to virtual currency business activities and updated their money transmission laws.

Moreover, states have their own sets of securities laws. Those are not necessarily preempted or superseded by federal law. In other words, even if a crypto asset is a utility token under the Howey test and is not considered a security under federal law, a state regulator may come in and enforce state-level “blue sky” laws. As just one example, the state attorneys general of Alabama, Kentucky, New Jersey, and Texas recently coordinated an unregistered sale of securities enforcement action against Slotie.com, which was selling gamified NFTs that represented virtual plots of land in a Las Vegas-style gambling metaverse.

Gaming in 2024 is full of innovative possibilities, especially as the crypto markets rebound, government regulation across the world matures, and public interest in alternative assets increases. However, there are many legal considerations to evaluate. The qualified and specialized attorneys of Artaev at Law stand ready to help with your next project.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2024 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law esports gambling law gaming law internet law

How to Advertise Real-Money Gaming on Meta in 2023: A Legal Opinion is Still Required.

Meta (formerly known as Facebook) remains an attractive forum for real-money gaming companies looking to advertise their skill-based gaming apps, esports, and fantasy sports offerings. However, Meta has a strict policy that requires an application and approval before any “online gaming” ads can run. The application form is convoluted and complex, and unless you have a gambling license from a state regulator, you will need to obtain a legal opinion from an experienced gaming attorney.

Artaev at Law PLLC has provided consulting, review, and legal opinions to gaming companies since 2020. We also have experience with the Meta/Facebook onboarding and application process. Before Meta’s overhaul of the process in August 2022, the application was much simpler than it is today. The advertiser disclosed their geographic target, acknowledged the requirement for geofencing and age compliance, and submitted a legal opinion that qualified their offering as a game of skill or other type of competition that does not require a gambling license. Now, the application process requires not only a selection of the proper jurisdictions from a drop down menu, it also requires the advertiser to choose which “category” is most appropriate for their game.

For example, when choosing the United States, Meta prompts the applicant to choose the states where the game will be offered. Clicking on a state gives a choice of the types of games that Meta considers available or “allows” in that state. This sublist is inconsistent and does not provide any context as to what types of games fall into each category. For example, selecting Texas gives the advertiser a single option to choose “sweepstakes.” But Texas courts have applied the “predominant factor test” to permit real-money games where skill predominates over chance in deciding the winner. The Texas legislature’s definition of “gambling” also contains an express exemption for “bona fide contest[s] for the determination of skill.” TX Penal Code 47.01. So, while Texas state law permits skill-based games that pass the predominant factor test, Meta’s drop down menu only allows “sweepstakes.”

Gaming companies must also select the protective measures that they implement to ensure compliance with their territorial restrictions and 18+ age policies. KYC checks may also be appropriate depending on the jurisdiction, but again, this is a requirement that varies by country and region. Smaller or startup companies often struggle with navigating the various requirements, but there are qualified third party administrator solutions that offer the necessary services for gaming industry participants.

Finally, unless your company has a gambling license from a state regulator, Meta requires a legal opinion from an experienced and qualified attorney regarding the legality of the game under a particular jurisdiction’s laws. For example, if a company is offering a mobile app game of skill in the United States, the legal opinion will need to address not only the application of federal anti-gambling laws (such as the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act and the Wire Act), but also the individual states. Each state has its own definition of “gambling,” various exceptions, and judicially-crafted test (such as the predominance or the material element test) that must be applied to the game in question. Also, the laws can change from time to time and must be addressed, such as when Virginia adopted specific legislation regarding certain physical games of skill in 2022.

Once the application and the opinion are submitted, Meta’s initial process is to check the submission for completeness (do not forget screenshots of your landing page!) and send it off for outside counsel review. The review can take as little as 2 weeks or as long as 3 months, depending on the game and the volume of submissions. Before the August 2022 reforms, if the application was rejected, there would be a specific reason and explanation. This allowed advertisers to go back to fix and resubmit their application. Currently, Meta does not give a reason for rejecting a submission. The default message is that advertising of the particular game or app is “not supported.” This is particularly frustrating when an advertiser has waited for weeks or months, just to find out their game is “not supported.” There is no clear appeal process either, and the advertiser is left to guess at how to best resubmit their application – or whether to simply try running ads without prior authorization (which risks Meta disabling the ad account and page).

Advertising on Meta can be a powerful boost to your game’s audience, but it is also a complex process that requires a legal opinion from an experienced attorney. There are many aspects to navigating the various laws in play, as well as KYC, age-gating, and geolocation requirements that are more and more prevalent across the industry. Contact Artaev at Law PLLC today to set up your initial consultation.

The qualified and specialized attorneys at Artaev at Law PLLC know gaming law – email or call us to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, tax, or investment advice. Every situation is different and has its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2023 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law esports gambling law gaming law internet law Uncategorized

Are Play-to-Earn Video Games Legal in the United States?

Are play-to-earn games legal? The answer depends on the specifics of the game. For many gaming developers, play-to-earn is a lucrative business model in 2023 and beyond. These games let players compete against other players (PvP) or against the the game itself (PvE) to earn rewards that have real-world value. For example, players may pay real money to buy in-game currency to purchase virtual gear or real estate, but players also have the option to redeem the in-game currency for real-world money. Players can trade resources or earn the in-game currency through gathering, completing tasks or quests, or other gameplay. However, any company looking at play-to-earn should retain an experienced gaming attorney to consult on their game. It may be an attractive business model, but any real-money gaming implicates multiple legal areas, including taxes, securities law, and both state and federal-level anti-gambling prohibitions.

Earning real-world cash for virtual goods or gameplay is not a new concept. In fact, the first generation of massively-multiplayer online roleplaying games (MMOs or MMORPGs) like Ultima Online, Runescape, and Everquest had robust real-money economies for in-game items. Resource “farming” – where one would gather virtual resources and then transfer them to another player for a real-world money payment – became even more popular with World of Warcraft and the next generation of the MMOs like EVE Online. However, the developers did not officially sanction these in-game economies. Anti-RMT (real-money trading) provisions are prevalent in most end-user license agreements. Real money components in video games may be too close to gambling, which is obviously problematic. Developers are generally reluctant to assume additional liability and risk associated with any real-money economic component.

Play-to-Earn is Hot, But Rife With Legal Pitfalls.

However, it is the end of 2022, and making money playing video games is a real and viable career choice. Esports and video game tournaments are mainstream events, with their own ESPN page, multi-million dollar teams, and celebrity-status professionals. Many colleges offer esports scholarships. Casual video game tournaments (Call of Duty, FIFA, Gran Tursimo) are also a thing. For the more casual gamer, there are also real-money skill-based games (timed solitaire, bingo, etc.) available on the web or from the App Store. Daily Fantasy Sports giants like DraftKings and FanDuel also offer skilled players an opportunity to win real money by drafting the best fantasy sports teams.

There are also a number of NFT-based collectible card games, horse racing simulators (like Zed.Run), and countless other permutations of games where players are able to own in-game assets that they can sell and trade like their real-world counterparts. This sector of the gaming economy continues to grow, as the relatively low cost of cryptocurrency makes entry a lot more accessible. Many players also see the current “bear” market as a prime opportunity to enter some of these projects at low cost and potentially see significant growth in their in-game assets as the economy rebounds.

Modern play-to-earn games are simply another variation of the real-money gaming business model. Developers in this space fully embrace the concept of a virtual economy and the ability to earn real-world compensation for game play. The most prominent example is Axie Infinity (a Pokemon-type trading, collecting, and battling game), which has integrated blockchain technology (crypto and NFTs). Investors around the world, including Mark Cuban, quickly embraced the play-to-earn gaming model. Even in the times of the “crypto winter,” Axie is still worth many millions of dollars.

Advertising and Onboarding May Require a Legal Opinion.

Any real-money gaming business (including play-to-earn) needs experienced gaming counsel to guide them through various compliance issues. Advertising a real-money game on social media and getting through Apple’s approval process on the App Store requires a legal opinion that the game is truly skill-based and not illegal gambling. Is your game structured so that they are providing a service to you in exchange for compensation? Depending on the nature of your game, you may have unintended labor law obligations and even tax filing (W-2 or 1099) obligations to the IRS and state tax authorities.

Make Sure Your Game is Not Selling Securities.

Another potential pitfall is with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). When designing your game and reward system, you must make sure that you are not inadvertently marketing a security and violating federal law. Securities are not just traditional stocks and bonds. An “investment contract” is also a regulated security and broadly includes any scheme where individuals pay money with the expectation that their money will be invested and they will earn a return. In the cryptocurrency world, initial coin offerings (“ICOs”) face heavy SEC scrutiny, especially after several high-profile cryptocurrencies turned out to be pyramid schemes.

The “investment contract” analysis is highly specialized and requires a thorough legal opinion. Each game is different, the laws are quickly changing in this area, and regulatory agencies are especially sensitive to crypto-related businesses in light of the numerous 2022 failings, bankruptcies, and rug pulls – with FTX being only the most recent example.

Beware Tax and Other Regulations If Your Game Uses Cryptocurrency or Other Blockchain Tech.

Speaking of crypto, if you are utilizing cryptocurrencies, tokens, NFTs, or other blockchain technologies as part of your game, there are more legal issues in play. Tax reporting and tracking are essential because the IRS considers cryptocurrencies to be property subject to capital gains tax. Does the game involve any crypto staking? If so, is your company now considered a bank subject to the FDIC’s jurisdiction? Are you involved in the business of money transmission and required to be licensed in each state where you do business?

Despite the slow regulatory change in this area and continued lack of centralized regulation, this area remains in the public eye and something of continued interest to regulators.

The bottom line is whatever your game and whether you are a veteran or just starting out, an experienced gaming attorney is a necessary asset to your business team.

Contact Artaev at Law PLLC to set up your initial consultation. We are Michigan’s gaming law firm and we specialize in the unique concerns that you may encounter as a game developer.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, tax, or investment advice. Every situation is different and has its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law gambling law gaming law internet law

How to Advertise Real-Money Skill Games on Facebook in 2022: A Legal Opinion is Necessary.

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

In August 2022, Facebook updated its real-money gaming and gambling advertising application process. The updated form streamlined some of the required information and still requires a legal opinion from a law firm. Additionally, Facebook requires details about protective measures like geo-location and KYC and detailed geographic targeting information, including states or territories being targeted. Skill-based gaming that awards real-money prizes is not considered gambling in a majority of the United States – but that conclusion requires a state-by-state legal analysis, as each state’s anti-gambling laws are different. Further, the laws change frequently in response to innovations like fantasy sports, legalization of online gambling, and the latest skill-based gaming tables.

Facebook considers all types of real-money gaming “restricted” content, meaning that Facebook must expressly approve your ad before it runs. Whether it is full-scale online casino gambling, poker, fantasy sports, or pure skill prize contests, the requirements are the same:

  • Ads that promote online gambling, and gaming where anything of monetary value (including cash or digital/virtual currencies, e.g. bitcoin) is required to play and anything of monetary value forms part of the prize, are only allowed with our prior written permission. This includes games where purchases are required to continue game play and/or provide advantage in winning prizes, in cases where the prize is of monetary value. Authorized advertisers must follow all applicable laws, including targeting their ads in accordance with legal requirements. At a minimum, ads may not be targeted to people under 18 years of age.

Clicking on “Apply for Permission” takes you to the recently updated Online Real Money Gaming Onboarding Application Form. Advertisers are asked to submit their ID numbers, ad account numbers, the name of their business, and to select whether they are an “operator,” “aggregator/affiliate,” or an “agent/intermediary.”

Facebook then asks the applicant to submit the URLs they are seeking to advertise. This is a particularly important part of the review process, as the review team and Facebook’s lawyers will closely look at the website to ensure legal compliance.

Next, the applicant must select the specific “protective measures” that they implement to gate access to their product:

  • Geo-blocking (gating) of the URL
  • Age-gating of the URL
  • Address verification software or process
  • KYC checks
  • Local cell phone number
  • National tax ID number
  • Any other measures, which must be specified

Applicants are then asked to select the country or countries that they targeting. Note that Facebook’s new rules allow only the following 36 countries to be targeted:

  • Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Columbia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States.

Selecting a country is not enough. Applicants must then select the specific states or territories they are targeting. For example, selecting the United States requires the applicant to select the states in which they plan to advertise. Selecting some of the European or South American countries requires information about the specific type of gaming or gambling to be promoted.

The next question is “Do you require a gambling license?” If no, the advertiser is required to submit “a reasoned legal memo by a law firm attesting to the legality of the advertised gambling/gaming without a need for a license.” If you need such a legal opinion, contact Artaev at Law, as we have analyzed a number of skill-based games and have been providing “where is it legal” opinions to Facebook (and other platforms) since 2020.

What goes into a legal opinion? At a minimum, the legal opinion will set forth a legal analysis of each state’s applicable laws and regulations (including case law) that support skill-based gaming in that state. The legal opinion should also address the applicable federal statutes and explain why they do not prohibit the game in question. Also, the legal opinion needs to explain the particular game’s mechanisms, why the outcome is not determined by chance, and how the various laws apply or not apply to the game in question.

A lot depends on the specifics of your game – for example, is the game more like fantasy sports or a pure skill contest? Also, even the bigger companies in the skill-based gaming industry disagree on the states where their games are permitted. Many states are currently addressing unlicensed skill-based gaming and regulations are constantly changing. For example, Michigan recently passed comprehensive online casino legislation and in the course of enacting the sweeping gambling laws, Michigan also included licensing requirements for skill-based real-money games.

Facebook remains a powerful advertising medium. Access to that medium is not free nor easy, especially if you are advertising a “restricted” product like skill-based real-money gaming. Ultimately, Facebook and its legal teams determine what ads meet its advertising policies. To minimize the review time and increase your chances of an approval, contact the experienced gaming attorneys at Artaev at Law PLLC.

Have more questions? Do you need help getting your app through the Facebook review process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2022 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law gaming law intellectual property internet law trademarks

Do I need a Metaverse Trademark?

Luxury goods company Gucci recently bought a plot of LAND in the Sandbox Game, an Ethereum-based play-to-earn game. This LAND is a virtual real estate plot (in the form of an NFT or non-fungible token) where Gucci plans to sell in-game clothing and collectibles. As futuristic as this seems, Gucci is not the only major company looking to get into the Web3.0 space. Walmart, McDonalds, Panera, Victoria’s Secret, Nike, and L’Oréal are just a few of the big players that recently filed trademarks specifically to protect their intellectual property in the Metaverse.

Nike has become particularly active. The company created a Nikeland experience in the popular Roblox game world (along with companies like Vans, Chipotle, and Hyundai, which also have staked out territory on Roblox). Nike also recently acquired RTFKT, a studio that specializes in NFT development and in January 2022, Nike announced the formation of Nike Digital Studios to create and deliver Metaverse and blockchain-based user experiences. Additionally, Nike has filed for dozens of trademarks to protect its virtual brand, including the use of its name and logo in online art, virtual goods, video games, and avatars. With a multi-billion dollar company like Nike trademarking dozens of its NFTs, many game developers, NFT collectors, traders, crypto bros, and others wonder whether they, too, should file for trademark protection within the Metaverse for their brand.

Do Gaming Developers Need Trademark Protection?

Absolutely. Games, gaming, and software in general are highly-competitive industries. Unfortunately, there is not much stopping a third party from copying your design and profiting off of it. This can create – not only marketplace confusion – but irreparable damage and dilution of your valuable brand. This can happen to companies big and small. Additionally, if you fail to trademark your game, brand, logo, catchphrase, etc., your competitor can come in, copy your brand, and then accuse you of violating their rights. While it is possible to file for retroactive trademark protection and win eventually, the easiest (and cheapest) protection is filing a trademark right away.

Do I Need to Trademark my NFT?

Yes. It is essential for you to trademark your NFT in order to protect it from copycats. The United States is a first-to-use country, which means your NFT will already have some automatic protections after minting. However, it would be very tough protecting your unregistered “common law” trademark in the worldwide NFT marketplace. Additionally, it would be very difficult to defend an unregistered NFT trademark in any sort of legal dispute should a third party copy your idea. Filing a trademark with the USPTO ensures validity and protection within all fifty states.

Trademarking your NFT creates a brand identity that is uniquely yours. Trademarking a unique slogan, logo, or design can be a valuable marketing tool for you going forward and add tremendous value to your project. After all, intellectual property rights are what you actually own when it comes to non-physical property like NFTs (and software or computer code in general).

Copyright is another important intellectual property right for NFT owners, users, buyers, and sellers. For example, it is critical to ask what rights you are actually buying when purchasing an NFT? Is there an agreement to transfer the copyright? A license? Nothing at all? Lack of clarity in the NFT transfer process can and will lead to litigation, more so as NFTs become more and more widespread.

How Do I Protect my NFT Internationally?

You can protect your NFT internationally, provided that you also apply for international registration during your initial trademark filing. Under the Madrid Protocol (which is an international treaty for the uniform protection and registration of trademarks), a registration through the USPTO can also be registered in other countries with a single application.

What is a benefit of international registration? International registration allows you to use a foreign country’s laws and judicial resources to enforce your mark in that country. A USPTO registration still allows enforcement through a U.S. based court, even if the infringer is in a foreign country. However, even if you prevail, you might not be able to enforce the U.S. court’s judgment abroad. An international trademark registration opens up a number of other enforcement options. If you are interested in international trademark registration, this is something to discuss at your initial consultation.

What Types of Things Should I Trademark?

Here is a non-exhaustive list of items that could potentially qualify for trademark protection:

  • Avatars
  • Logos
  • Game Name or Gaming Development Company’s Name
  • NFTs
  • Virtual Goods (avatar skins, digital art, etc.)
  • Color Schemes
  • Particular Sounds (The coin grab ding from the classic Mario Brothers game comes to mind here.)
  • Slogans

What Cannot be Trademarked?

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has a set of guidelines that lists some of the following reasons for trademark rejection:

  • Likelihood of Confusion – If you create a game called GranD Turismo 7, you could not trademark that name because people could confuse it with Gran Turismo 7, the newest addition to PlayStation’s highest selling video game franchise. Sony owns the trademark to protect against competitors who seek to profit off of its name recognition by creating a similarly named game. Thus, you cannot trademark GranD Turismo 7.
  • Merely Descriptive and/or Intentionally Misleading – For example, you can’t trademark the words “fun and entertaining.” Even though your game is both fun and entertaining, these only describe the game itself and don’t necessarily make your game unique, so you can’t trademark them. Likewise, the USPTO will reject your trademark if it is intentionally misleading. For example, if your game’s name is “Play with Cryptocurrency,” but the game does not play with cryptocurrency, the USPTO reviewer could consider this game name intentionally misleading and deny your trademark.
  • Primarily a Surname – For example, Smith’s Play-to-Earn Game is primarily a last name (and merely descriptive) would not be suitable for a trademark.

How do I file a trademark for my game or NFT?

Whether you’re filing a trademark for an NFT, a digital avatar, a slogan, or your business name, Artaev at Law has the professional expertise to help you do it right. Artaev at Law, together with the specialized trademark attorneys at Mighty Marks, now offers a fixed fee, all-inclusive trademark service. Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com for additional information.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional. Any link to or reference to any specific project is not an endorsement of or validation of that project and is for solely informational purposes.

Categories
business law gaming law internet law

Ask the Crypto Tax Lawyer: Are Play-to-Earn Games Taxable?

Disclaimer: This article is not investment advice, tax advice, or legal advice. It is for informational and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action (including investments) until you have consulted with a professional about your specific situation.

At the end of 2021, Ubisoft announced its plans to add NFTs (Non-fungible Tokens) into Ghost Recon: Breakpoint. Players’ in-game weapons, vehicles, and other rewards will be tradable and sellable on a secondary market, adding a real-world value component to the game. Ubisoft will become the first mainstream videogame developer to incorporate NFTs into its video games, although other A-list developers like SquareEnix are also planning to transcend the virtual and real worlds through blockchain technology.

Ubisoft follows in the wake of some popular Play-to-Earn (P2E) games like the global sensation Axie Infinity. According to a January Business Insider article describing the P2E crypto gaming model, Axie Infinity increased the value of its native AXS cryptocurrency (an Ethereum token) by a staggering 18,000% in 2021. Metaverse platforms that promise fully functional virtual worlds in the near future like Decentraland and Sandbox also saw explosive growth. For example, Decentraland’s native MANA token increased in value by 4000%. The main draw of these virtual worlds is that they allow users all over the world to earn cryptocurrency and NFTs that tradable for mainstream crypto or fiat money. Obviously, the returns and growth potential have captured the attention of many.

However, real world earnings mean real world taxes. As crypto and NFT earnings become more and more mainstream, more tax payers will have to consider the tax implications of cryptocurrency. The IRS considers cryptocurrency to be property, which is subject to capital gains tax similar to stocks or bonds. While the IRS has had guidance on cryptocurrency transactions since 2014, NFTs are a much more recent phenomenon without official guidance. Which then creates a number of questions for P2E players about how their winnings are reported and taxed.

Do I owe taxes on my play-to-earn winnings?

Absolutely. Because play-to-earn games allow users to earn cryptocurrency or NFTs, which then can be exchanged for fiat currency (e.g. U.S. Dollars), these earnings are considered income. In general, real world earnings mean real world taxes; however, the way your earnings are taxed will depend on several different variables.

To understand how the IRS will tax play-to-earn gains, you must first apply a few basics:

Are all P2E earnings the same?

No. Although both cryptocurrency and NFTs exist on the blockchain, they are two very different things and have different tax implications. Non-fungible tokens or NFTs are unique digital-only objects or unique digital versions of real-world objects. This is basically computer code. Mostly associated with collectibles and art, NFTs use blockchain technology like cryptocurrency but can represent almost anything, including virtual real estate, in-game vehicles or weapons, and personalized avatars. In the case of Ubisoft’s Ghost Recon, the “in-game earnings” will be in the form of NFTs. Similarly, the Pokémon-like Axie creatures that players acquire in Axie Infinity are also NFTs. These in-game items are pieces of unique computer code stored on the blockchain. These NFTs can later be exchanged for other NFTs or cryptocurrency.

Cryptocurrency, however, is not a unique collectible, but rather, a virtual currency. The IRS, in its Frequently Asked Questions on Virtual Currency Transactions, defines crypto as a type of virtual currency or “a digital representation of value, other than a representation of the U.S. dollar or a foreign currency (“real currency”), that functions as a unit of account, a store of value, and a medium of exchange.” Play to Earn games like Axie Infinity will commonly use crypto. In fact, Axie Infinity, much like Decentraland (which is more of a general attempt at a metaverse, rather than a stand-alone game), developed its own crypto token (AXS). AXS is tradable and exhcnagable into more mainstream currencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum (which are easily convertible into fiat), giving them value – not only within the game sphere itself – but also within the real world.

How do P2E gamers make money?

To fully understand taxes, it is first important to understand the basics of the P2E economy. Play-to-earn games give players an opportunity to win both cryptocurrency and NFTs by playing a game. Most often, the game will use its own native token as an in-game currency. The in-game currency and NFTs have value on the secondary trading market. To use Axie Infinity as an example, a player can earn value in several different ways:

  • First, a player acquires NFTs known as SLPs (Smooth Love Potions) through monster battles, player versus player fights, or by completing daily missions and quests. The player can then exchange those potions for cryptocurrency or even cash by selling them on an NFT exchange or DEX.
  • Second, a player can use SLPs to breed rare magical creatures (NFTs) known as Axie. Depending on the Axie’s traits and characteristics, an Axie NFT can fetch $200 or more on the secondary market.
  • Third, a player can stake AXS tokens in exchange for a particular return rate. Staking with crypto tokens is akin to holding money in a certificate of deposit (albeit, much riskier).
  • Finally, the game may award tokens or NFTs via airdrops. Airdrops are giveaways that the game may send its players as part of random promotions or in return for doing specific tasks.

What (and how) the game pays the player determines the type of taxes that particular player will owe. Is the income in the form on an NFT? Tokens? Staking income? An airdrop?

Are there taxes on tokens?

Whether it is called a token, cryptocurrency, or virtual currency, a native game token is taxed like intangible property and is subject to capital gains tax. The IRS has had a consistent position on this since at least 2014. When you purchase cryptocurrency or tokens with fiat currency (e.g. U.S. Dollars) you do not pay tax on the transaction. So if you buy AXS directly for USD, this is not a taxable transaction. However, if you buy AXS for ETH or BTC or another cryptocurrency, stablecoin, or token, you have incurred capital gains because the IRS considers you to have sold cryptocurrency you have traded – even if the transaction is a direct exchange.

If you earn crypto tokens as a part of a Play-to-Earn game, the value of such crypto is taxable as ordinary income. Likewise, when you sell crypto tokens on an exchange, you are taxed on the gain (if any) just like you would be if you sold a stock or investment real estate. Again, when you exchange one cryptocurrency for another (for example, you buy AXS with stablecoin) the exchange is taxable. Accordingly, it is critical to keep accurate and clear records of every transaction involving cryptocurrency, regardless of gain or loss.

How are NFTs taxed?

The IRS has not issued definitive guidance on how NFTs will be taxed, but most experts agree that NFTs will probably be considered property like cryptocurrency and be subject to capital gains tax. When applying this framework, NFT investing generally involves three different taxable events:

  • The Purchase of a NFT with Crytpocurrency. Play-to-Earn games often require a buy-in. Axie Infinity, for example, requires players to buy three Axies to start, which currently costs around $1,500. If you “buy-in” with cryptocurrency like ETH, the IRS will consider you having sold the ETH and have earned income equal to the difference between your purchase value and sale value. The acquisition of the NFT itself is not taxable for the buyer – but, is taxable for the seller as income.
  • The Sale of the NFT in exchange for Crypto. Selling an NFT creates a taxable capital gain or loss equal to the difference between purchase and sale price. Simply put, if you bought an NFT for $1,500 and sold it for $2,000, you incurred a $500 gain. If you bought the NFT for $1,500, but sold it for a $1,000, you have a $500 loss that you can use to reduce your other capital gains or even your ordinary income up to a certain amount.
  • The Exchange of the Crypto proceeds for U.S. Dollars or other fiat currency. Like the sale and purchase of NFTs, the exchange of a cryptocurrency into USD or other fiat currency will also trigger a taxable capital gain or loss depending on the difference between the original purchase price of the cryptocurrency (or token) and the price at the time of its sale.

Currently, there are no tax exemptions or safe-harbor periods that allow traders avoid capital gains tax on exchange type transactions.

Are NFT investors taxed differently than NFT creators?

Yes. Let’s say you’ve found a way to farm massive amounts of SLP (Smooth Love Potions) in Axie; these are NFTs. The initial creation or the minting of the NFT is not a taxable event. However, the sale of the NFT is taxable. However, in this case, since you are the creator and also the seller, and you technically “did the work” to earn the NFT, the IRS will likely consider the proceeds from your NFT sale ordinary income for tax purposes.

Is staking taxable?

Yes. Sure, my staked sheep in Wolf Game owe a 20% tax to wolves on all sheered WOOL; everyone knows that. But do I also have to pay WOOL taxes to the US government? Yes. Many taxpayers currently consider staking the same as crypto mining income, which means they will owe taxes on the fair market value of the WOOL the moment they receive the WOOL in their wallet – not just when they sell it.

The IRS is currently in litigation regarding this issue. The question being considered is whether the cryptocurrency or token has taxable value at the time of minting ( in my case “shearing”) or whether it should be taxed only upon sale of the WOOL – similar to the way traditional manufacturing companies operate. (For example, factory owners don’t pay income tax on a manufactured table, even though that manufactured table holds value, until the table sells.) This is one of the many unanswered questions in the blockchain sphere that regulators are catching up to answer.

Are Airdrops Taxable?

Yes, generally airdrops are considered ordinary income based on the fair market value of the drop at the time you get it. As with everything else, crypto-related, be sure to keep detailed records of all your crypto transactions to make sure that you account for them properly.

So, Do I Owe US Taxes on My Earnings from Play to Earn Games?

Yes. Real world earnings mean real world taxes. Whether you earn NFTs, native tokens, or Bitcoin, those assets have value and therefore subject to income tax. You, as the taxpayer, are still obligated to report income just like you would be if the game paid you in stock. As always, it is important to consult a crypto tax expert to see how the specifics of your situation apply to current IRS guidelines.

Further reading:

https://artaevatlaw.com/2021/10/05/play-to-earn-games-legal/
Is Playing Video Games for Real Money Legal? It May Depend on the Game.
Ask the Crypto Tax Lawyer: What Are the Tax Implications of Cryptocurrency and NFT Investing?
Categories
business law esports gambling law gaming law intellectual property internet law

Are Real-Money Video Game Tournaments Legal?

Video games are quintessential contests of skill and online multiplayer modes are a must in most modern video games. And yes, playing skill video games for real money prizes is legal in the majority of U.S. states. Some of the most popular video games (Call of Duty, Fortnite, Magic: Arena, and others) frequently feature official in-game tournaments with real-money prizes for the top finishers. Fueled by the global popularity of esports, there is also a growing number of third-party esports tournament sites and apps. These third-party offerings are essentially on-demand, which means that there are always head-to-head challenges waiting and frequent “cash cups” with winners able to win a hundred dollars or even more.

Real-money game tournaments and contests serve as a more casual alternative to professional esports. Not everyone has the time (or the reflexes) to go pro or even compete at the collegiate level. But, you may be skilled enough to dominate your local group of friends at Call of Duty or FIFA and there are plenty of offerings to let you win real money prizes against online opponents. Some of the most innovative companies even integrate streaming (for example through Twitch) to add an exciting “audience” element to real money play. Anyone can feel like an esports pro. There is also a growing opportunity for market crossover, with streamers getting involved in real-money play and adding a whole new dimension to their entertainment potential, audience, and branding opportunities.

What kinds of legal issues will a contest or tournament organizer/developer encounter? As with any business, there are several distinct legal areas in play.

Esports competitions or tournaments are not expressly regulated or prohibited under U.S. federal or state law.

First, from a government regulation perspective, no states expressly prohibit esports or video game tournaments. However, there are several jurisdictions that prohibit any sort of real-money gaming. This is the case even if the game involves a pure contest of skill (even offline, like a hole-in-one contest). Accordingly, tournament organizers and app developers stay away from those restrictive jurisdictions.

In the remaining states, game contests, tournaments, and esports are not licensed under any sort of “gambling” or “fantasy sports” regulatory scheme. The largely unregulated market means that there are a number of service providers out there that disagree on where their product can be offered. Some are more conservative than others, but there is not a definitive list of where gaming competitions are legal or illegal. At least one state – Nevada – passed legislation to create an esports advisory board (within its Gaming Commission), to recommend best practices for maintaining integrity of esports competitions and related betting. According to Nevada lawmakers, they recognize the value in the esports competition industry and want to ensure Nevada remains an attractive investment environment for this burgeoning industry. At this time, the potential advisory committee is the closest any state has come to any sort of esports-specific legislation.

A lot depends on the specific competition and tournament model, as well as the types of games being played. For instance, are shuffled cards involved (Magic: The Gathering)? Or some other element of randomness (like team or opponent selection)? Are bots or AI players involved? How do all these elements interact and do they introduce a significant chance element that may affect the outcome? Does the randomness element render the game illegal “gambling”?

Third-party video game websites and apps implicate the intellectual property rights of the underlying game’s developers and may be subject to DMCA takedown notices or federal trademark lawsuits.

Second, esports competitions and tournaments do implicate intellectual property rights, specifically the rights of the game developers. A game’s developer (like Blizzard, Riot, or Epic) owns the copyrights in its games and underlying code. Third-party apps and websites operate without any sort of license from the developers, which may be a violation of copyright or trademark law. Disclaimers alone may not be enough – using game imagery, logos, or even gameplay footage may constitute copyright or trademark infringement. A player or streamer may be protected by the “fair use” copyright law exception, but a company that organizes and monetizes game tournaments is unlikely to prevail on this argument. At the same time, a properly run game tournament organizer may not have sufficient interaction with the game itself to violate IP rights. After all, the players are the ones playing. Each situation is highly fact-specific and there is certainly no bright line rule.

As real-money video game tournaments become more widespread, expect to see pushback from the game studios. At least one studio – Epic – has announced an aggressive stance towards third-party platforms that facilitate playing Epic’s games for real-money prizes (particularly Fortnite). However, as of the date of this article, no lawsuits have been filed.

Combining real-money tournaments with streaming is an attractive business model, but may involve complex licensing and contract issues.

Third, streaming tournaments and competitions, as well as partnering with known streamers, involves a number of contract law and licensing issues. Each streaming service has its own set of terms. Players (and organizers) streaming real-money game content must ensure that they are compliant with the terms or risk being banned from the platform. Further, who owns the streaming content? Normally, the creator has the intellectual property rights to their own content, but it is not so clear-cut when streaming a tournament or other organized contest. Tournament organizers should ensure that rights and expectations are clear from the outset, especially if a well-known esports streamer or player is involved. If the streamer is granting the organizer a license to showcase their gameplay, the license should at a minimum be in writing. Any royalties, cross-promotions, and sponsorships likewise need to be negotiated ahead of time. Even the best intentioned relationships go awry when money becomes involved.

For developers looking to launch a new esports or game tournament app or website, an experienced gaming attorney is a must-have. Artaev at Law has worked with a number of gaming companies from across the world and has the expertise you need. Reach out today to set up a meeting with Dan.

Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
esports gambling law gaming law internet law

The Three Types of Skill-Based Real-Money Games: Room for Innovation, Not Stagnation.

The skill-based real-money gaming market remains a popular and innovative business environment. The draw for players is that they can play games and win real money, but also improve their chances of winning through skill. Unlike gambling or casino-style games, skill-based gaming is not mathematically skewed in favor of “the house.” There are many types of games to choose from – card-based solitaire-like games, bingo, bubble puzzlers, trivia, and even sophisticated physics-based racing games. Best of all, unlike casino gambling and sports betting, skill-based real-money games are legal and available in the majority of U.S. states and internationally as well.

For developers, the upside is obvious. Monetization of gaming has always been profitable and a lucrative business – hence the tightly-regulated casino and sportsbetting markets. Designing a mobile game instantly gives the developer access to customers across the world through a well-established distribution network (i.e. the Apple App Store). When done right, real-money skill games are not required to be licensed or otherwise regulated in a majority of the states. This makes the real-money skill game market very accessible to most developers, including smaller studios with limited budgets and without the lobbying firepower that would otherwise be required to enter the money gaming market.

These factors combine into a highly-competitive market. This makes it difficult to design a profitable game without innovation. For example, the Skillz.com platform (publicly traded as SKLZ on the NYSE) boasts over 30 million players and over 30,000 developers. However, according to Skillz’s August 2021 prospectus filed with the SEC, only three games accounted for 74% of all revenue in 2021. These so-called “big three” are Tether’s “Solitaire Cube” and “21 Blitz,” and Big Run’s “Blackout Bingo.” Predictably, there are number of copycat games that are very similar to these “big three” in design and gameplay. To be successful, developers must innovate. As part of their development and marketing efforts, all companies in this space need to understand the three main types of skill games, each with its own set of regulatory nuances:

Pure-Skill Games

The first category of games is the “pure skill” variety that are similar to the popular Solitaire Cube, 21 Blitz, and Blackout Bingo that account for such a large share of the market. These games pit players in head-to-head contests, multiplayer battles, or tournaments the outcome of which depends solely on the skill of the player. For example, in Solitaire Cube, players are given the same deck and are scored on how well and fast they play Klondike Solitaire using these cards. Players pay an entry fee, with the winner receiving a cash prize.

These “pure skill” games do not involve any other factors than the players’ own skill in determining the outcome. There are limitless possibilities in this genre – anything from knife-throwing games, to cup flipping or “beer pong” style contests, to trivia games fall into this category. Some particularly innovative developers have even developed sophisticated physics-based games (similar to Angry Birds) that take serious dexterity, planning, and logic to master.

Pure-skill games are legal under U.S. federal law, as well as in the majority of U.S. states. Because skill games involve the opportunity to win real money, the Apple App store and various social media advertising platforms require special approval and an application that must be accompanied by a legal opinion from qualified gaming counsel. Payment processors also require special approval, a physical presence in the United States, and have their own set of standards and rules that must be met before your gaming account is approved.

Fantasy Sports or Market Games

The second category of skill games are those that are similar to the daily fantasy sports (“DFS”) contests offered by DraftKings and FanDuel. Generally, participants pay an entry fee and then are given a virtual currency budget to spend on a lineup of sports players to be on their fantasy team. The fantasy team then scores points based on real-world performance and the participants that accumulate the most points can win a cash prize.

Traditional sports and leagues like the NBA, NFL, MLB, and NHL are not the only options. There is at least one fantasy esports platform that lets players put together a lineup of their favorite gaming stars. There are also fantasy stock market games that let players pick a portfolio of real-world shares and win prizes based on how well their portfolio does against other players.

The key distinction between these fantasy games and pure-skill games is that the outcome of a fantasy game is not determined solely by a player’s skill. While it certainly takes knowledge and research to put together the best team, points are awarded based on real-world performance that is outside of the participants’ control. In fantasy sports, a particular player might have a bad game, get injured, or fall victim to bad officiating or adverse weather conditions. In fantasy stocks, a particular stock might enjoy a sudden price spike due to a merger announcement or a new product. Or, a stock might quickly lose value due to an SEC investigation or other unpredictable real world factors. In 2020, the IRS issued two separate memoranda analyzing and addressing this distinction, concluding that DFS involves “wagering” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code. At a minimum, the IRS’s position matters from a tax perspective: does your skill-based game involve “wagers” subject to excise tax?

DFS and similar fantasy games are more regulated than “pure-skill” games. DraftKings and FanDuel currently offer their DFS products in 43 states and are a good regulatory bellwether. In some states, DFS is offered as an unregulated skill-game product that falls outside of the state’s definition of “gambling.” In other states, legislatures have passed laws that expressly exclude DFS from “gambling,” but do not otherwise regulate or license DFS. In contrast, states like Michigan have enacted comprehensive licensing regulations for DFS. There are also states that outright ban any sort of real-money wagering. And, there are states that have issued DFS-adverse legal opinions and are embroiled in litigation to decide whether DFS constitutes illegal “gambling.” In other words, the regulatory landscape for DFS-type games is complicated and requires guidance from an experienced gaming attorney.

Arcade-Style Skill Games

The third category does not involve mobile phones, computers, or the internet at all. Rather, these games look like arcade cabinets or even like slot machines, and are found in certain bars, restaurants, and other public establishments. Originally, these games were purposefully designed to look and feel like slot machines, but introduced additional player choice or input features so that they would involve skill and purportedly fall outside of the definition of “gambling” in most states. Authorities in some states have cracked down on these types of machines (sometime called “nudge machines” or “skill slots”), concluding that the claimed skill element was a sham or otherwise insufficient to render the machine a true game of skill.

Despite the ongoing pandemic and the ubiquity of gaming options on mobile devices and the internet, these cabinet-type skill games are still thriving. One particularly popular game called “Dragon’s Ascent” has attracted the attention of regulators in the D.C. area and has sparked debate over whether the game (which pays out cash prizes) is an illegal gambling device. Players score points by shooting magic balls at dragons to capture them, using the joystick and buttons to direct and time their shots. The two-player version looks like a traditional arcade cabinet. The eight-player version adds an impressive-looking table that doubles as a screen. Both versions include drink holders, and the game’s promotional material specifically targets bars as a way for them to “offer something new.”

Although the barriers and start-up costs to enter into this specific market are significantly higher than the mobile game field, the presence of arcade-style skill games demonstrates the level of innovation and variety in the industry. Bars and restaurants that survive the pandemic may very well be interested in real-money skill games as one way to bring customers back to their in-person establishments. It is also possible that bars and restaurants will partner with more skill game developers to introduce mobile or more individualized real-money games to their establishments. After all, having a pint and betting $5 on a game of pool or darts is one of the most traditional and familiar ways to bet on a game of skill. Technology may advance, but people’s desire to compete, wager, and win real money remains the same.

Have more questions? Do you need a legal opinion or help getting your game through the regulatory process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law esports gambling law gaming law internet law

IRS Rulings on Daily Fantasy Sports Wagering: What Does This Mean for Skill-Based Gaming?

Real-money skill-based games are very popular across the world and the United States is no exception. Generally, real-money skill games allow players to compete against others in various games where the outcome is determined by the relative skill of the players (as opposed to chance). In simple terms, it is the same betting your friend $5 on a game of darts or pool at the local pub. Except these games are played online – most frequently on smartphones. Games range from timed solitaire contests (using the same deck), to knife throwing or cup flipping games, to trivia contests. Because chance does not determine the outcome, most states’ anti-gambling laws do not prohibit skill-based games. U.S. based and international companies have been working to invest in this space, using the increasing availability of the internet and smartphone apps to provide entertainment to players seeking to compete against others and win some money in the process.

I have written extensively about legality of skill gaming, as well as the obstacles that developers need to overcome to get their games up and running and advertised.

Besides private company gatekeepers, local law enforcement, and regulatory authorities, there is a new obstacle for skill-based gaming companies. This time it comes from the IRS and could have broad market implications beyond simply paying taxes.

In 2020, the IRS issued two related memoranda regarding Daily Fantasy Sports (“DFS”) wagers. Recall that DFS is an accelerated version of traditional fantasy sports, giving players a chance to set lineups and compete on a daily basis, rather than having just one team for the entire season. DFS is available in 43 states through the two major operators: DraftKings and FanDuel. Similar to pure-skill games, DFS distinguishes itself from gambling by emphasizing that relative skill of the players determines the outcome (as opposed to chance). In some of the 43 states, DFS operates pursuant to government license. In other states, DFS is unregulated and either expressly or implicitly exempt from the statutory definition of “gambling.”

In the first 2020 memo, the IRS considered whether DFS operators (i.e. DraftKings and FanDuel) were required to pay excise tax on wagers pursuant to IRC §§ 4401 et seq. Under federal tax law, each “wager” is subject to excise tax – sportsbooks are very familiar with this provision that requires the bookmaker to pay tax on every bet accepted from a patron. In answering in the affirmative, the IRS defined “wager” without any reference to an element of chance:

“[T]he statutory language in IRC §§ 4401 and 4421 does not differentiate whether an activity involves skill, chance, or some combination of the two. Most importantly, whether DFS is a game of skill for state gambling statute purposes is not relevant for determining whether DFS is wagering for federal excise tax purposes.”

IRS AM 2020-009

At the same time, the IRS did not overturn Revenue Ruling 57-521, which was a 1957 opinion on whether a puzzle contest was a taxable gaming transaction. Rather, the IRS distinguished that in the puzzle contest “the contest participant’s own skill was the only factor involved in winning the puzzle game and there was no chance element at all.” In DFS, the participants use their skill to select a lineup, but then earn points based on the real-world performance of the selected athletes (over which the participants have no control). The IRS emphasized that no matter how educated and skilled a DFS participant may be, there is always a chance that the chosen player or players will perform poorly that particular day, get injured, or suffer adverse effects on their performance from the weather or officiating. Thus, the IRS concluded that the “skill” involved in DFS was similar to the skill involved in traditional sports betting or horse race “handicapping.” Finally, the IRS also explained that that the rate of excise tax (0.25% or 2%) depends on whether DFS is “authorized” under the law of the state where the wager is accepted. The IRS did not explain whether “authorized” means DFS is operating pursuant to express state license or is simply outside of the particular state’s anti-gambling legislation.

Two months after the excise tax memorandum, the IRS relied on essentially the same analysis to conclude that DFS wagers are “wagering transactions” that can be used to offset wagering income during a taxable year under IRC § 165(d). Effectively, DFS wagers are treated the same as gambling losses under the IRC. In its legal analysis, the IRS reiterated:

Any argument a DFS transaction is not wagering because it is based on skill must fail because elements of chance beyond the participant’s control ultimately determine the outcome of the transaction

IRS Memorandum 202042015

Why does the IRS’s DFS analysis matter for skill-based real-money gaming? Two main reasons: (1) The IRS’s interest in DFS transaction could signal increased tax scrutiny for real-money skill-gaming operators; and (2) the IRS’s legal analysis of whether a skill game is actually gambling/wagering could be adopted by states that currently do not regulate skill-based gaming.

1. Do real-money skill-based game companies have to pay federal excise tax?

There is no doubt that pure-skill games are still exempt from the definition of “wager” and “wagering transaction” for tax purposes. However, it is unclear whether there can be “any” chance at all. The first IRS memo cited a 1957 puzzle game ruling to distinguish pure-skill games, noted “there was no chance element at all,” and concluded that “[t]he existence of chance indicates that DFS contests are distinguishable” from the pure-skill puzzle game at issue in the 1957 memo.

In the second memo, IRS revised its position slightly to conclude that “the test is not whether there is an element of chance or skill, but which is the dominating element that determines the result of the game.” Regardless, the IRS took the position that the outcome of a DFS contest is predominantly determined by chance (as opposed to skill). DFS industry leaders have predictably issued statements opposing the ruling, calling it “deeply flawed” and inconsistent with state court decisions that have held that DFS is a game of skill.

If you are a real-money skill game developer, it is critical to determine whether your game has any element of chance at all. In other words, is your game more fantasy sports or pure contest? If there is any element of chance at all, you must determine whether skill “is the dominating element” of the game. Most, if not all, real-money skill games will pass this second test. At the same time, if your game is more like fantasy sports (for example a stock market or cryptocurrency picking game), your game will likely be considered to involve taxable wagering. This obviously subjects you to the excise tax under IRC §§ 4401 et seq. An added wrinkle is whether you owe tax at the 0.25% “authorized” rate or the 2% “unauthorized” rate. Most skill-based operators operate without a license or governmental approval – but at the same time, they only operate in states where their activities are not prohibited by state anti-gambling laws.

2. Will states adopt the IRS definition of “wager” to regulate real-money skill-based gaming?

Additionally, the IRS analysis may be adopted by states seeking to regulate or prohibit real-money skill games. For instance, if you are paying excise taxes to the IRS, a state regulator can easily use that fact to argue that your game is actually “wagering” and therefore constitutes “illegal gambling.” This is especially troubling because the first “excise tax” memo seems to require “chance only. It is also possible that real-money skill games will be considered “wagering” for the purposes of excise tax imposed by IRC §§ 4401 et seq but not “wagering” for the purposes of IRC § 165(d).

Stay tuned for more on this developing area. It is likely that DraftKings and FanDuel are headed for a showdown with the IRS over the excise tax issue. Any resulting Tax Court decision (or even settlement) will have significant repercussions for the skill-based gaming industry.

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal or tax advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserve

Categories
business law esports gambling law gaming law internet law

A Guide to Getting Your Skill-Based Real-Money Game Approved in the United States.

Skill-based real-money gaming has been a popular form of entertainment across the world for hundreds of years. From Roman legionnaires wagering on an early version of backgammon to $5 eight-ball games at your local pool hall, skill games have always attracted players looking for a chance to win real money. With smart phones in every pocket, skill-based gaming has entered a new era where anyone with an internet connection can play various money skill games through their phone or computer and stake anywhere from $0.25 to hundreds of dollars on the outcome.

Gaming is a rapidly growing industry and the skill-based real-money market is no exception. Indeed, there is already at least one publicly-traded California-based company (Skillz.com; SKLZ) investing substantial resources in the real-money skill-based U.S. market. However, any sort of real-money gaming business implicates federal and state-level regulation. While a government license is not necessary in most states, your game must still pass private sector review. Apple’s App Store is indispensable in the current market; advertising through social media like Facebook is another must. Banking and payment processing is likewise an integral part of your ability to run a business.

I have advised a number of companies, both international and U.S. based, on the legality of their skill-based real-money games. Through Artaev at Law, I have prepared detailed memorandums and analysis for a number of companies, as well as provided consultation to investors seeking more information about the real-money skill-games market. As a game developer, here is what you need to know:

1. Get Your Game to the Players.

If you were to get into the full-scale casino gambling market, you would have to comply with stringent state-level regulatory requirements, pay substantial application and licensing fees, and otherwise deal with an intricate governmental regulatory framework. Further, in the few states where casinos are even legal, there is only a limited number of licenses that a state will issue. In other words, it is impossible. But real-money skill gaming operates outside the gambling regulatory framework, which means you don’t have to go through a government licensing or regulatory approval process to offer your product (in most states).

Instead, real-money skill game providers find themselves faced with so-called private company gatekeepers. The popularity of real-money skill gaming is in large part due to the ubiquity of the smartphone. Apple’s App Store is the only practical way to get real-money skill games onto iPhones (no, people will not “unlock” their iPhones to sideload your real-money skill game, especially when the App Store already has a robust selection of these games that are easy to download and use). Google’s Play store does not currently allow real-money skill games, so there developers must either provide sideloading options or use a Progressive Web Application (PWA).

The bottom line is that developers must pass Apple’s “gatekeeping” to even get their app on the market. That means complying with the App Store Review Guidelines. Section 5.3.4 is particularly important:

5.3.4 Apps that offer real money gaming (e.g. sports betting, poker, casino games, horse racing) or lotteries must have necessary licensing and permissions in the locations where the app is used, must be geo-restricted to those locations, and must be free on the App Store.

Apple considers real-money skill games to fall into this category, even though skill games do not depend on chance like the “sports betting, poker, casino games, horse racing” examples. This guideline can be distilled into three requirements: (1) The app must be legal where you are offering it; (2) The app must be geo-restricted to only those locations where it is legal; and (3) the app must be free.

The first requirement is the most important and the most confusing for app developers. How do you demonstrate that your app has “necessary licensing and permissions” if the states where you are offering your real-money skill games do not regulate such games? This is a situation where a legal opinion or memorandum from an experienced gaming attorney is helpful. In general, such a legal opinion will describe your game, explain how the game fits within existing federal regulations, and then present a state-by-state analysis (supported by applicable statutory and case law citations) to show that the skill game does not violate those states’ anti-gambling prohibitions or any other law.

The second requirement of geo-restriction is self-explanatory. Your app can only offer real-money gaming if the user verifies their location in a state where such gaming is legal. You can still offer practice or play-money games without geo-restriction (or if the user does not want to or cannot verify their location).

The third requirement is that the app must be free. Section 5.3.3 of the review guidelines further clarifies that “in-app purchase” cannot be used to purchase credit or currency for use in the real-money gaming app. That means that you will need to set up some sort of external mechanism for deposits, link the user’s existing account and balance to the app, and ensure compliance with the external payment processors’ requirements.

Once submitted, the review process can take between several weeks to more than a month. A lot depends on whether your app is similar to other apps already approved or whether it is something completely new. Other factors, like the reviewer or the law firm reviewing the legal analysis may also impact the timeline.

2. Advertise Your Game.

Advertising is critical to your app’s success and online advertising platforms have special rules for real-money games. Social media companies like Facebook and Twitter require prior approval and permission before running your gaming ad. The process is similar for both platforms and generally involves filling out a questionnaire, selecting the geographic areas you are targeting, providing a link to your app’s website, and submitting a legal opinion that your app comports with the law where it will be advertised. Google and YouTube (owned by Google) do not currently allow real-money skill game advertising.

This process may be a bit more lengthy than getting approval from the App Store. Depending on the nature of your product, your location, and the platform, the process may take several months. The social media platform may also come back with additional specific legal questions for your counsel to answer. The level of follow up and scrutiny is hard to predict because the social media companies farm out the review to outside law firms, which have their own standards and review processes.

3. Set Up Your Payment Processor and Bank.

Once your game is live and advertised, it’s time to start making money. There are a lot payment processors out there (PayPal, Square, etc.) and each has their own set of rules and guidelines for business accounts. The federal Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act applies to payment processors, so they must be especially careful not to facilitate illegal gambling activities. Credit card companies present another potential obstacle, as credit card companies often lump skill-based gaming with gambling into the 7995 merchant code.

For example, after states started rolling out regulated sport-betting options, Visa issued guidance that made its payment services available for “all transactions that are consistent with local, federal, and international laws.” Visa introduced new 7800-series merchant codes for legal gambling, but none of those codes apply to real-money skill gaming transactions. Practically, this means that skill-gaming transactions may still fall under the blanket 7995 code and Visa may not authorize the transaction. Nor does Visa issue an MVV (merchant verification value) for 7995 merchants, meaning that skill-based real money gaming companies are limited as to their direct-pay options.

This essentially requires skill-game companies to explore options through payment providers like PayPal. Provided you are based in the United States and can link a bank account, the process should be straightforward. If you are based in another country however, there is a whole another set of hurdles to overcome.

There’s More.

Getting your game approved, advertised, banked is only the first step. You will also need robust terms and conditions that govern your relationship with your users, which is especially critical when dealing with real-money gaming and facing potential payout disputes. A privacy policy is also a must, especially if you are offering your game internationally. Then there is the issue of taxation and whether you should be paying excise tax on skill-based game wagers. Real-money skill-based gaming is a hot market, but requires experienced legal counsel to get through these various issues.

Have more questions? Do you need help getting your app through the review process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Exit mobile version