Categories
Uncategorized

Is a Bad Review Defamation? Protecting Your Business Reputation Online.

Following my previous article about online defamation, business owners frequently ask me whether they can “sue” Facebook or Yelp or Google, etc., to get a negative review removed. Or whether they can “sue” the poster for “reputation damages.” This is especially common in the trucking industry, where Carrier411 hosts a platform that allows brokers and customers to review carriers. Often times, a dispute or a misunderstanding between a carrier and a customer leads to a “report” or a bad review on Carrier411 that causes frustration and may even result in lost business.

A negative review by itself is not always defamation. To win on a defamation claim in court, you need to prove: (1) a false and defamatory statement about the plaintiff; (2) unprivileged publication to a third party; (3) fault amounting to at least negligence; and (4) actionability per se or the existence of special harm.

What does this all mean for the business owner faced with a negative review?

  • First, a successful defamation claim requires a false and defamatory statement. This is the most commonly misunderstood element, but it is absolutely critical. A negative review – even if the business owner has a different side of the story, or does not agree with it – is not actionable unless it is actually false. A statement of opinion – even if negative – is not a false statement of fact because there is no such thing as a false opinion. That is an important difference, especially in the age of social media. A person may go on your restaurant website and freely post something like “I hate the atmosphere and I did not like the food here at all.” That is not defamation, even though it is a negative review. Rather, it is a statement of opinion. A good test is to ask: how am I going to prove that the statement is false? What types of evidence will I introduce to refute the “facts” that were posted? There is no evidence that you can introduce to refute a statement of opinion – in other words, the customer’s perception of atmosphere and the food is their own. If they did not like it, then it is their opinion, and they are entitled to it. Also, the statement must be defamatory, that is injurious to your business reputation. A statement that is false, but is not negative or otherwise critical of your business is not actionable. For example, if a review says “This restaurant is located in midtown Detroit,” when in fact the restaurant is downtown, the statement is false, but not defamatory.
  • Second, there must be unprivileged publication. “Publication” just means dissemination to others – meaning third parties. Of course, if something is posted online, it is published. “Unprivileged” means that the statement is not made in the context of a protected communication, such as a legal filing with the court, a police report, or some other type of special protected communication.
  • Third, the false statement must be made with at least negligence. That simply means that the person making the statement either knows that it is false or does not bother to try to find out before publishing. Even if a person publishes a false statement about your business, they may not be liable if they consider it true based on a reasonable inquiry.
  • Fourth, there must be an element of damages. In business cases, this element is usually satisfied automatically, as damages to business reputation are considered actionable per se. However, actual damages are still critical and must be proven – otherwise you may end up recovering only nominal damages. While punitive and exemplary damages, as well as attorney fees, are available under MCL 600.2911, there are no guarantees that they will be awarded. A case is always more persuasive if there are actual damages that are proximately caused by the negative post, review, or other published statement.

Even if you can prove the four elements, there are practical factors to consider before filing a lawsuit. Are you prepared to bear significant litigation costs – thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars? Are you prepared to invest time away from your business to prove your case? Never treat litigation as an investment opportunity because no business owner makes money paying their attorney and spending time in court.

The good news is that there are other options besides litigation that you can discuss with your attorney. Often times, an informal discussion with a dissatisfied customer can solve the issue. A cease-and-desist letter can be effective as well. If the potential damages are significant, pre-suit mediation may be the most cost effective option to resolve the dispute.

One final note – in Michigan, defamation claims must be brought within a year of the event. Other states may have different deadlines, but if you think you may have a claim, talk to an attorney sooner rather than later.

Dan Artaev is an experienced business attorney who advises a number of domestic and international businesses on various topics, including defamation. Email us or call us to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2024 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.-

Categories
Uncategorized

But Your Honor, He Said a Bad Thing About Me on Facebook: Business Defamation Claims in the Age of Social Media

It is 2024 and every business has an online presence – whether through a website, on Google, or on social media. It is more important than ever for business owners to know what can and cannot be said (i.e. posted) regarding their business online. In other words, can you sue to get that negative review off of Google? Or what about that irate ex-employee that keeps posting false information to your Glassdoor page? Can an overzealous freight broker’s post against a trucker on Carrier411.com lead to a lawsuit?

In a recent Michigan case that involved Carrier411, Penguin Trucking Inc. and E.L. Hollingsworth & Co., faced off in a business defamation case. The two companies were contracted for the same job at different rates by an outside third party. However, by the time the two companies found out about the scam, Penguin Trucking had already had the freight in its possession and was unable to make a deal with E.L. Hollingsworth for them to reconcile and both deliver the freight.

Since Penguin Trucking already held the freight, they decided to enter into a deal directly with the end customer for the delivery. Shortly thereafter, an E.L Hollingsworth employee posted a scathing report on Carrier411.com, a trucking monitoring service website. The employee wrote that Penguin Trucking “held [the] load hostage,” attempted “in-transit agreement modification,” and accused them of “unethical or deceptive business practices.” In any industry, potential customers are reluctant to do business with companies that have negative reports written about them, like those written on Carrier411.com. In the trucking business, Carrier411 reviews are especially crippling and can even destroy a smaller or startup business. Penguin Trucking experienced these adverse effects first-hand when it lost out on a contract with a shipper based on the FreightGuard. In litigation, Penguin Trucking proved not only that the online statements were false, but that the loss of the shipper contract was directly linked to the Carrier411.com review. Penguin Trucking was awarded $612,400 in damages for this lawsuit.

Michigan’s laws are clear about what constitutes defamation and what does not. Most other states have similar laws that protect against false statements that damage a business’s reputation. There are four elements to a defamation claim in Michigan:

  1. A false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff;
  2. An unprivileged publication to a third party;
  3. Fault amounting at least to negligence on the part of the publisher; and
  4. Either special per se harm or actual damages proximately caused by the statement.

For a more in-depth look at what each element means and requires, check out my latest article about protecting your online reputation.

If someone is posting intentionally false information about your company on the Internet (including a false FreightGuard report on Carrier411) you have a right to defend your company. An experienced attorney can help with various options short of litigation, such as sending a cease-and-desist letter and negotiating a resolution on your behalf. If litigation does become necessary, we can also provide the necessary support and consultation to take your case before the proper court.

Have more questions? Contact our firm by email or call us today to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2024 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

5 Legal Tips for Business Owners Weathering the Coronavirus Disruption

There is no doubt you are distracted by this coronavirus outbreak. Constant news alerts, supply shortages, government-mandated closures and cancellations make it all but impossible to also run your business. However, remember that your lawyers are available to assist you. For example, if you have questions about obligations to your employees, insurance coverage questions, contract responsibilities, or anything else related to your business, feel free to reach out. In the meantime, here are 5 legal tips to help your business through the crisis with minimal disruption:

  1. Review your existing contracts for a “force majeure” clause. Do you have a contract with a supplier, distributor, or vendor? Has the coronavirus outbreak affected performance under the contract – for example, are payments being delayed? Are shipments delayed? Has demand dropped to the level where you are having trouble paying normal operating expenses? The reality is that a lot contracts were negotiated in “good times” without the threat of external forces disrupting business operations. This means not all contracts provide for what happens in times of crisis, and if they do, they are often generic provisions that may not even be applicable to the current situation. Nevertheless, some contracts have standard terms — known as “force majeure” or “Act of God” clauses — that allow for contract termination, modification, or delay in performance under certain extraneous circumstances. Importantly, even if your contract does have such a clause, it often includes notice obligations to the other party – so if you suspect that contract performance may be disrupted (either on your end or on the part of the other party), contact a business attorney for guidance on your rights and obligations.
  2. Review your existing lease and make sure you know your rights and responsibilities. Leases are another type of contract that may be affected by the pandemic. In general, commercial leases are drafted in such a way that a tenant’s obligation to pay rent is absolute and non-excusable. If you are a business owner having trouble making rent payments due to decreased demand, you need to carefully review your lease for any possible options, including early termination. Alternatively, you should be prepared to discuss lease modifications with your landlord. If you are on the landlord side, reach out to your tenants and discuss any potential issues directly. While eviction is still available as a remedy, consider that finding a replacement tenant may be more difficult at this time, and you may want to conserve resources instead of spending money to evict someone. And as always, reach out to an attorney if you have any questions about your rights and obligations under any lease.
  3. Purchasing or selling a business? Adjust your expectations or consider termination. Uncertainty is high, which means that many business deals that seemed profitable a few months ago may no longer be attractive to potential buyers. Whether you signed a letter of intent and are conducting due diligence, or you are at the purchase agreement drafting or even closing stage of the transaction, make sure you know your rights and responsibilities. Is there a specific time for performance and what happens if there is a delay? Is “time of the essence” to this transaction? Particularly, be aware of any penalties or liabilities that may be attached to termination of the pending transaction before closing. There may be a liquidated damages provision involved, or perhaps something more onerous, like an “actual damages” clause, including attorney fees. You should have an attorney representing you in any buy-sell transaction, and in the current situation, it is especially important to retain advice about your options.
  4. Know that courts are still functioning, although in a diminished or delayed capacity. One of the reasons that it is critical to know your rights and responsibilities under your various contracts, is that you want to avoid business litigation. But you may think, aren’t courts closed? So how can I protect my rights? Most courts are actually operating in a “diminished” capacity, with civil litigation taking a back seat to criminal matters. However, a lawsuit can still be filed. And, if there is a need for emergency relief like an injunction against a former employee actively stealing customers, it is still available. Understand that even if the justice system is operating in a limited capacity, it is still operating. Litigation is a possibility – and expect that even when this pandemic is over, there will still be litigation fallout over breaches of contract and other business matters that arose due to business disruptions in this difficult time.
  5. This is a perfect opportunity for “corporate catch-up.” Even if your business is currently slow or completely shut down, this time may be a great opportunity to talk to your lawyer about some business matters that you have been putting off. For example, have you trademarked your logo, slogan, or business name? Do you have a new business idea and need to incorporate a new business? Or, do you need to update your LLC’s papers to reflect the fact that you hired your niece as your new CFO? Are there old corporate entities out there (after an acquisition or merger) that continue to exposre you to personal liability? And ask yourself, is your business prepared for the 4 Ds — divorce, death, disability, and debt? Now may be the perfect time for “corporate catch-up.”

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com or 269-930-0254 to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

3 Common Mistakes that Compromise a Business’s Corporate Protection and Expose Your Personal Assets.

Businesses that commingle assets, forgo record keeping, official minutes, and fail to keep their registration with the State of Michigan up to date risk losing their corporate protections. In most cases, the corporate form limits your personal liability and insulates your personal assets from business debt – unless a creditor successfully argues that the corporate form is a sham and used to perpetuate fraud. However, this protection is not an absolute and there are many situations where that protection may be set aside and personal assets (the owner’s house, boat, car, bank account, etc.) are at risk.

Even if you run a perfectly organized business with current paperwork and a separate bank account, there are still situations where you are at risk of personal liability for your business debts. The following three scenarios are most common:

  1. Did you sign a personal guaranty for a business lease or a business loan? Personal guaranties (or guarantys) are additional collateral that you may be asked to execute as a prerequisite to a business loan or even a business lease. A personal guaranty is effectively an agreement that waives your corporate protection and allows a creditor to go after your personal assets directly. Because a small business does not have many assets to collateralize a loan or assure a landlord that obligations will be paid, you may be asked to sign the personal guaranty. Whether you accept that risk is up to you, but at a minimum you should read the document carefully and discuss it with your attorney so that you understand the implications. You may also be able to negotiate for a lease or loan without a personal guaranty, but in most cases you will need to provide sufficient collateral or other assurances to secure your obligations.
  2. Are you knowingly breaching a contact or a lease? Some business owners erroneously assume that because they have an LLC, they can ignore contracts or leases. For example, if your company signed a 3-year lease in a dying shopping center – what’s to stop the LLC from defaulting on the lease and walking away? A lawsuit can only reach the LLC, right? That’s not only wrong, but it is also a dangerous line of thinking that may put your personal assets at risk. A court will not allow the abuse of the corporate form to evade obligations or escape debts. Understand that corporations are created by statute – i.e. the law – to facilitate business. At the same time, the court system will not apply the law to facilitate a party’s evasion of its contractual obligations. If you are abusing the LLC to default on loans, other contracts, or lease obligations, a court may very well determine that you are abusing the system, pierce the corporate veil, and impose personal liability.
  3. Are you moving assets around to another company? You may also think that you can simply start over by forming a new LLC, transferring the assets of the old LLC to the new one, and leave the loans, contracts, and leases behind with the old shell of a company. But even if you declare bankruptcy for the old LLC, your assets are not immune from creditors. The bankruptcy proceedings allow aggrieved creditors to challenge any transfers made before bankruptcy as “fraudulent” and have them set aside for the creditor’s benefits. And even if your old business had no assets, a court may still impose personal liability and pierce the corporate veil if it is determined that your actions were for a fraudulent purpose – such as escaping a debt, contract, or lease obligation.

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com or 269-930-0254 to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Terror From Beyond the Grave: 5 Critical Mistakes To Avoid When Terminating Your Company

It is a classic horror movie plot line. The good guy finally killed off that scary monster/evil janitor/gremlin. Hooray! Triumphant, the hero turns his back to celebrate with fellow survivors when SUDDENLY the monster/evil janitor/gremlin rises from the dead to take down that one final victim! In the business world, if you do not take the proper steps to terminate your corporate entity and ensure that it is “dead AND buried,” (which I swear is a real term of art) the entity can come back from the grave. The undead entity will then cause all kinds of problems and could even result in potential personal liability for the unwary business owner.

First, termination does not mean a business has failed. Even if your company grows and is successful, there may be a time that you need to terminate its existence. The most common example is when you sell your business. If it is an asset sale, the buyer purchases the real estate, equipment, customer lists, intellectual property, etc., but leaves the corporate entity for the seller to dispose of.

Second, before we get to termination, I assume you have read my other posts and properly incorporated your business. You also should have had your attorney draft the initial corporate documents. These documents will often contain the rules and procedures for the terminating the corporate entity. Following these internal rules and procedures is critical to a successful dissolution and wind-up.

Finally, and without further ado, the following is a list of the 5 most common missteps to avoid when terminating your business:

Mistake #1 – Not consulting with an attorney and an accountant. Termination is not as simple as filing a form with the State of Michigan. There are multiple considerations that control the process and are unique to your business. For example, what do your bylaws or articles of organization say about termination? Do you need unanimous consent of the equityholders or a majority vote enough? Are there tax implications and personal tax liabilities to consider? What about the timing of any liquidation distribution? Only a professional can provide fact-specific counsel for your particular situation.

Mistake #2 – Confusing “dissolution” and “winding-up.” Although both terms refer to the termination of a corporate entity, the processes are different and controlled by different statutory provisions. Dissolution is something that is triggered by an event – for example, a unanimous vote of the LLC members or a bankruptcy as set forth in the bylaws. Winding up on the other hand refers to the process of liquidating the corporate entity. In other words, dissolution is the process of making the company “dead” – whereas winding-up is a process to ensure that it is “buried.”

Mistake #3 – Assuming that dissolution alone protects you from personal liability. Dissolution alone is not enough to protect a business owner from creditors and litigants. In Michigan, the law permits a dissolved corporation to “sue and be sued in its corporate name.” MCL 450.1834(e). Same goes for a dissolved LLC. MCL 450.4805(3). Moreover, improper dissolution could lead a court to conclude that the corporate form was a sham designed to elude creditors, and result in a court order to “pierce the corporate veil.”

Mistake #4 – Failing to follow the statutory requirements. Whether your company is organized as a for-profit corporation, a non-profit, or an LLC, there are specific statutory requirements for the termination process. For example, Michigan law requires an LLC to provide specific information in its certificate of dissolution. MCL 450.4804. This is critical because proper dissolution is a statutory prerequisite to winding up the LLC’s affairs (meaning liquidation). See MCL 450.4805 and 450.4806. In other words, failure to carefully follow the dissolution process risks a subsequent argument that the wind-up process was invalid and the liquidation was illegal. Note also that there are separate laws that govern corporations and LLCs and it is imperative that you follow the correct procedure for your specific type of entity.

Mistake #5 – Neglecting creditors for the benefit of shareholders. Terminating a company does not relieve the company or its equity holders from liability for debt obligations. If you are unable to pay your lender or cannot pay an adverse judgment, then you should consider filing for bankruptcy. In the process of a normal dissolution and liquidation, Michigan law presupposes solvency and mandates that creditors get paid first. MCL 450.4808(1)(a). And of course, government tax obligations must be paid even before the other creditors. MCL 450.4808(2).

Dissolving and winding-up your business is a complex process that requires consultation with a professional. Failure to ensure that the company is “dead AND buried” presents many risks going forward and can even lead to personal liability for the owners.

Contact attorney Dan Artaev today at dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Exit mobile version