Tag: sec

Categories
Uncategorized

Do Play-To-Earn Games Sell Unregistered Securities?

Play-to-earn game developers that sell in-game currency tokens or NFTs to their players may be inadvertently selling unregistered securities. Offering unregistered securities is illegal and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) may prosecute developers and obtain injunctions, civil penalties, and orders to refund all investor funds (disgorgement). Further, the investors themselves can sue developers (including as a class action) for securities laws violations, all of which can be financially devastating. Securities laws are a major factor to consider, but there are other applicable laws and regulations that determine whether a play-to-earn game is legal. Accordingly, it is absolutely critical to consult with an attorney specializing in play-to-earn and obtain a legal opinion regarding legal compliance before offering and selling any fungible or non-fungible tokens.

What do securities laws have to do with gaming?

Securities are traditionally associated with stocks and bonds traded on various exchanges. However, “securities” is actually a much broader term and includes virtually anything that a company sells to raise funds, whether to the general public or to a select group of high net worth individuals in a private placement. In the play-to-earn context, either the in-game currency token or the game asset NFT can be considered securities. Crypto/blockchain/NFT regulation is still at the early stages, but the SEC has taken an active enforcement role in pursuing fraud and illegal token offerings in the digital assets market.

Not all tokens or digital assets are securities. The uses a four-prong analysis called the Howey test to determine whether an offering is a security. More precisely, courts apply the Howey test and examine whether something is an “investment contract,” which is a type of security. The United States Supreme Court created the test in SEC v. WJ Howey, 328 U.S. 293 (1946), when it determined that a company selling shares in an orange grove farming operation was actually selling unregistered securities. If a token does not qualify as a security under the Howey test, it is generally considered a “utility token” and may be sold without the constraints of securities laws (but may still be subject to other regulations).

How do securities laws apply to gaming tokens or NFTs?

An “investment contract” has four elements: (1) an investment of money; (2) in a common enterprise; (3) with the expectation of profit; (4) derived from the efforts of others. With digital assets, the SEC generally assumes the first two prongs are met. Most, if not all, play-to-earn tokens involve an investment of money (either fiat currency or cryptocurrency with value) in a common enterprise (i.e. the game project). Thus, whether an offering is an exempt “utility token” or an unregistered security depends on whether the purchasers are led to expect profit derived from the efforts of others. In other words, does the purchased token function as a passive investment that pays dividends?

Of course, this is a very fact-specific inquiry. The SEC’s Strategic Hub for Innovation and Financial Technology (“FinHub”) has a rather complex set of guidelines and guideposts for the analysis, called the “Framework for Investment Contract Analysis of Digital Assets.” The SEC also relies on the DAO Report, which was a 2017 investigation of the Swiss-based DAO Project that explains the SEC’s application of Howey to digital assets.

In general, the determining factor is how the tokens are used. Do players actively use the NFTs they acquire to play the game and earn rewards? For example, an owner must manually enter the racehorse NFTs in Zed.Run (a hugely popular play-to-earn horse racing game) into various races, deciding on the best course type and distance suited to that particular “racehorse.” If the NFTs “wins,” the owner wins a prize, just like in real-life horse racing. Axie Infinity is another example of where players must actively manage their NFTs and “battle” them before earning rewards. Active in-game management likely negates both the third and forth prongs of Howey, as players purchase the tokens for in-game use and any rewards are not from the efforts of others – they come directly from the efforts of the player/owner. The same logic applies to in-game currencies that can be used to acquire in-game assets, pay entry fees, upgrade NFTs, and for other purposes. Simply put, while the in-game currency may certainly fluctuate in value on the secondary market, it is not a passive investment vehicle. It is an active “utility” component of a play-to-earn game.

Do staking and lending features affect the securities analysis under Howey?

As play-to-earn games become more sophisticated, so does the analysis. Many games now offer “staking” – which rewards players with in-game currency for parking their tokens or removing them from circulation for a set period of time. Additionally, NFT renting and lending are becoming more common, where owners let third parties to borrow their NFTs, actively use them within a game, and in return, receive a share of any winnings. The staking and lending mechanisms effectively enable passive income for token owners. Passive income is a hallmark of a security under the Howey test.

Play-to-earn games are a rapidly growing sector of the overall crypto and NFT market. It is critical for developers to ensure legal compliance, not only to protect themselves and their companies from crippling lawsuits, but to also make their product attractive to potential investors. In 2022, a comprehensive legal analysis of the play-to-earn project is a must-have for any pitch deck. Note that even if the token or NFT is not a security under federal law, state level “Blue Sky laws” may apply. Additionally, a token or NFT may be regulated as a commodity or under money transmission laws. In other words, the securities analysis is only part of a full legal evaluation.

Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2022 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

What is a Security Token Offering (STO) and How Do I Use It In My Business?

gold round coins on gold glittery surface
Photo by Alesia Kozik on Pexels.com

A security token offering (or STO) is a 21st century blockchain-based alternative to a traditional equity or debt sale to raise company funds. Instead of selling units or shares, a company sells digital tokens to investors. Instead of selling SAFE (simple agreement for future equity) notes, companies can offer a SAFT (simple agreement for future tokens).

But why would a company want to sell tokens in the first place? STOs and traditional equity offerings fall within securities laws and must either be registered with the SEC or comply with exemptions (Regulation A+, D, or S for example). State-level “blue sky” laws may also apply. Also, like traditional securities, STOs represent fractional ownership in a tangible asset, either an equity interest in the company, a profit share, or debt instrument.

An STO does have certain benefits over selling traditional securities:

  • Unlike traditional securities, the STO eliminates third parties and middlemen inherent in a traditional securities offering, leading to greater efficiencies, lower costs, and a faster issuance process.
  • Blockchain technologies are inherently transparent, as the digital ledger is public. This makes the offering inherently more secure.
  • By selling tokens, companies can tap into financial markets across the world that would not be normally accessible. An investor from Asia or Europe can easily buy into a company STO, just as an investor from the United States.
  • Security tokens are considered more liquid because investors can buy, sell, and trade tokens around the clock.
  • The digital nature of the tokens makes corporate governance and voting easier and more transparent.

Another distinguishing characteristic of an STO is that a company can tokenize and sell fractional ownership in almost any real world asset – such as real estate, a machine, or even intellectual property. This opens up a host of possibilities and financing options that would otherwise be limited or unavailable with traditional securities. This is especially attractive to high-tech startups whose business model is already based on or related to the blockchain.

STOs should not be confused with ICOs (initial coin offerings). ICOs boomed in 2017, as some companies turned to unregistered token sales to raise funds outside of the traditional securities disclosure, registration, and other legal requirements. In 2017, the SEC issued an investor bulletin and clarified that these digital token sales constitute “investment contracts” that meet the SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946) test and therefore must be registered as securities under federal law. ICOs also are associated with several high-profile “exit scams,” where cryptocurrency promoters claimed big plans for a new crypto project, collected funds from investors, and then simply disappeared with the funds. Other ICOs purported to be “high-yield investment programs” that turned out to be nothing more than Ponzi schemes.

As cryptocurrency, NFTs, and other blockchain-based technology became more mainstream in 2021, it is important to recognize that the STO is a new way for innovative companies to raise funds. While these are still securities offerings that must comply with applicable regulations, the flexibility, transparency, and efficiency that these digital instruments offer are certainly attractive.

Want to know more? Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2022 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Ask the Crypto Tax Lawyer: Offsetting Capital Gains Through Loss Harvesting.

Update: As of November 10, 2021, Congress is in the process of considering legislation to preclude loss-harvesting through cryptocurrency sales. Congress is also considering other amendments to the Tax Code and other laws to address cryptocurrency specifically. As this is a rapidly developing issue, it is critical that you consult with a tax attorney or other professional about your specific situation and the current state of the law before making any transactions or business decisions.

More than half-way through 2021, cryptocurrency remains an extremely popular investment. Although volatile and subject to unpredictable regulation (yes, that means China), the market has experienced substantial growth. Exchanges like Coinbase and integration with PayPal make owning, trading, and speculating in cryptocurrency easy. Sophisticated investors have even added cryptocurrency into their self-directed retirement portfolios, banking on the continued growth and popularity of the decentralized exchange medium.

As I have previously written, the IRS is keeping a close eye on cryptocurrency investors, transactions, and markets, looking to capture taxes on hundreds of millions in underreported or unreported income. In other words, crypto taxes are going to be an issue for many in the coming tax years, especially after the Biden administration’s mandatory $10,000 or more transaction reporting rule goes into effect in 2023. However, with proper planning and strategy, there are ways to reduce your tax liability even if you are planning to liquidate your crypto positions in the near term.

As a basic matter, know that the IRS classifies cryptocurrency as “property,” which means that it is subject to capital gains tax. General capital gains reduction strategies work for cryptocurrency as well as they do for more traditional property like investment real estate, stocks, and bonds. For instance, waiting at least 365 days to sell lets you take advantage of the lower long-term capital gains tax rate. Selling in a lower income year where your overall income puts you in a lower tax bracket is another strategy.

One advanced tax strategy involves taking advantage of the so-called wash sale rule. Or rather, it is taking advantage of the fact that the wash sale rules does not apply to cryptocurrencies (yet). Under Treasury Regulation 26 CFR 1.1091-1, an investor cannot sell “stock or securities” at a loss, use the loss to reduce taxable income, and then immediately repurchase the stock or security. Under the wash sale rule, there is a 30-day waiting period before purchasing the same or substantially the same stock or security – if an investor repurchases the security within the 30-day restricted period, the loss will be added to the cost basis of the repurchased security and reduce capital gains on the sale of the repurchased security, but it will not be treated as an investment loss to reduce general tax basis. In other words, you cannot manufacture losses in a bear market to reduce your taxable income that you receive from other investments, rentals, or wages.

The IRS has been clear that cryptocurrency is treated as “property” for tax purposes. However, whether it is a “stock or security” remains unanswered and both IRS Notice 2014-21 and the recently amended FAQ are silent on the issue. There is no express definition of “stock or securities” for the purposes of the wash sale rule. Looking elsewhere in the Internal Revenue Code, the definitions of stock and securities in various other sections include traditional shares, notes, bonds, and the like. Indeed, in 1988 the United States Tax Court adopted a narrow interpretation of the Code, holding that stock options were not considered “stock or securities.” Gantner v. Commissioner (91 T.C. 713 (1988). Congress responded by amending the wash sale rule to expressly include stock options, but still did not enact a definition of “securities” for the purpose of the rule.

Based on the current Code and Regulations and the lack of IRS guidance on the issue, there is a strong argument that cryptocurrencies are not “stock or securities” for the purposes of the wash sale rule. What this means is that crypto investors can take advantage of loss harvesting to accrue losses and use those losses to offset income. For example, if you buy one Bitcoin for $30,000 and the next day the price drops to $20,000, you can sell the Bitcoin at a loss of $10,000, “harvest” the loss, and repurchase the Bitcoin for $20,000 shortly thereafter. You still own 1 Bitcoin, but now you have accumulated a loss that you can use to offset capital gains income.

If your losses exceed capital gains, you can use up to $3,000 of loss to reduce regular income. Any excess loss can be carried over to future years to offset future gains.

At the same time, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and certain United States courts have ruled that cryptocurrencies are indeed “securities” within those Commissions’ regulatory scope. This regulatory effort was generally to stem the fraud and abuse through “initial coin offerings” or ICOs that sought to evade strict regulations designed to protect investors. While there is currently no indication that the IRS would consider cryptocurrency as “stocks or securities,” there is precedent for that conclusion from these other agencies and remains possible that the IRS could issue supplemental guidance and interpretations to that effect.

At the time of this writing, the IRS has not issued any such interpretation and savvy investors can consider the loss harvesting strategy if appropriate for their particular situation. As with all cryptocurrency transactions, good record keeping is paramount. It is especially critical to have accurate records to substantiate your losses if you are repurchasing the same crypto. Good and accurate records are the best tool in defending your position to the IRS, should the IRS take a position and disallow your claimed losses.

Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Exit mobile version