COVID-related Employment Lawsuits Are on the Rise: What to Watch For and How to Avoid Them.

Employment lawsuits and EEOC complaints are surging. All employers have had to adjust in response to federal, state, and local COVID orders. Small business not previously subject to FMLA have had to suddenly enact polices to comply with expanded regulations under the Families First Coronavirus Relief Act (“FFCRA”). Transitioning employees to remote work has not been easy either. However, businesses have to take extra care to make changes and transitions the right way, so that they are not subjected to employment discrimination or retaliation lawsuits. Litigation is not the only downside to employee strife – turnover is notoriously expensive and adding new team members during the pandemic brings its own set of challenges. Remember that communication, flexibility, and kindness goes a long way as we all continue to deal with a surging global pandemic.

An important note: Michigan recently enacted the COVID-19 Response and Reopening Liability Act that gives businesses immunity from COVID-related tort claims so long as they have been following all applicable laws and regulations. A tort claim is a claim that a customer or visitor can make against your business for an injury suffered on the premises. This new Act only applies to tort claims – it does not grant immunity from discrimination, contract, workers’ compensation, or any other type of claim or lawsuit.

What are some of the situations that may lead to an employment discrimination or retaliation claim against your business? There are many different situations, and each is fact-specific, but here are some common examples:

  • Discharging an employee because they or someone they have to care for contracted COVID.
  • Discharging an employee, reducing their hours, benefits, or otherwise treating them differently because they are taking leave under the FFCRA.
  • Denying an employee parental leave to care for a child whose school closed or when child care becomes unavailable.
  • Threatening to demote employees, reduce hours, or to reduce pay if they took leave under the FFCRA.
  • Denying reasonable accommodations for remote work or schedule adjustments.

Illegal retaliation is generally easier to prove than discrimination. Discrimination requires proof of an employer’s illegal motive. Retaliation simply requires proof that an employer treated an employee differently when they took leave or after they came back.

What can you do to protect your business from employment discrimination or retaliation claims? Again, each business and situation is fact-specific, so there is no one-size-fits-all approach. However, here are some general guidelines:

  • Be flexible and recognize that the pandemic has affected people with different family circumstances in different ways. People with children and single parents are more likely to need adjustments from their employers.
  • Make sure your workplace polices and employee handbook are up-to-date and consistent with the latest government guidance.
  • Educate managers and supervisors on the policies and applicable laws to ensure best practices.
  • Consult an attorney if you are not sure about how the new regulations apply to you or whether your organization is following federal and state employment laws.

Above all, be kind, flexible, and understanding. The pandemic is a world-wide crisis that has impacted everyone, and some more than others. From a business standpoint, a little flexibility can go a long way to reducing turnover cost, litigation costs, and boosting overall worker morale (which is invaluable).

Dan Artaev is a former Assistant Attorney General with the State of Michigan in the Labor Division, and in private practice has represented numerous employers with respect to employment law matters, including responding to EEOC and wage and hour complaints. Email Dan at dan@artaevatlaw.com or call or text (269) 930-0254 to set up your consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal advice. Every business is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action with respect to your business until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

3 Common Mistakes that Compromise a Business’s Corporate Protection and Expose Your Personal Assets.

Businesses that commingle assets, forgo record keeping, official minutes, and fail to keep their registration with the State of Michigan up to date risk losing their corporate protections. In most cases, the corporate form limits your personal liability and insulates your personal assets from business debt – unless a creditor successfully argues that the corporate form is a sham and used to perpetuate fraud. However, this protection is not an absolute and there are many situations where that protection may be set aside and personal assets (the owner’s house, boat, car, bank account, etc.) are at risk.

Even if you run a perfectly organized business with current paperwork and a separate bank account, there are still situations where you are at risk of personal liability for your business debts. The following three scenarios are most common:

  1. Did you sign a personal guaranty for a business lease or a business loan? Personal guaranties (or guarantys) are additional collateral that you may be asked to execute as a prerequisite to a business loan or even a business lease. A personal guaranty is effectively an agreement that waives your corporate protection and allows a creditor to go after your personal assets directly. Because a small business does not have many assets to collateralize a loan or assure a landlord that obligations will be paid, you may be asked to sign the personal guaranty. Whether you accept that risk is up to you, but at a minimum you should read the document carefully and discuss it with your attorney so that you understand the implications. You may also be able to negotiate for a lease or loan without a personal guaranty, but in most cases you will need to provide sufficient collateral or other assurances to secure your obligations.
  2. Are you knowingly breaching a contact or a lease? Some business owners erroneously assume that because they have an LLC, they can ignore contracts or leases. For example, if your company signed a 3-year lease in a dying shopping center – what’s to stop the LLC from defaulting on the lease and walking away? A lawsuit can only reach the LLC, right? That’s not only wrong, but it is also a dangerous line of thinking that may put your personal assets at risk. A court will not allow the abuse of the corporate form to evade obligations or escape debts. Understand that corporations are created by statute – i.e. the law – to facilitate business. At the same time, the court system will not apply the law to facilitate a party’s evasion of its contractual obligations. If you are abusing the LLC to default on loans, other contracts, or lease obligations, a court may very well determine that you are abusing the system, pierce the corporate veil, and impose personal liability.
  3. Are you moving assets around to another company? You may also think that you can simply start over by forming a new LLC, transferring the assets of the old LLC to the new one, and leave the loans, contracts, and leases behind with the old shell of a company. But even if you declare bankruptcy for the old LLC, your assets are not immune from creditors. The bankruptcy proceedings allow aggrieved creditors to challenge any transfers made before bankruptcy as “fraudulent” and have them set aside for the creditor’s benefits. And even if your old business had no assets, a court may still impose personal liability and pierce the corporate veil if it is determined that your actions were for a fraudulent purpose – such as escaping a debt, contract, or lease obligation.

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com or 269-930-0254 to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
Uncategorized

Into the Fire: Effective Strategies for Litigation Management Before Going to Court

Are you a litigious business owner? Do you copy your attorney on correspondence to a non-paying client or a vendor? Have you ever threatened another business owner with “I’m going to sue you”? Is this something you do as part of your day-to-day business routine? Does your county’s local business judge know you by name? If so, you probably are not effectively managing the litigation aspect of running a business.

As a Metro Detroit business attorney, I frequently encounter clients who are always “ready to sue.” However, as an attorney, my job is to counsel the client regarding all possible approaches, and to the extent that litigation is the preferred route, I am always honest with the client regarding the judicial process. If your lawyer talks up your case, or uses terms like “sure thing” or “slam dunk” to describe the lawsuit, stop and ask questions. Litigation is not a “hammer” with which to punish someone who wronged you – rather, the justice system is designed to be a neutral process to achieve a the correct result by applying the law to your specific facts.

But you may be thinking–come on Dan, this guy or girl totally screwed me! File the lawsuit tomorrow! I WANT BLOOD!!! I’ll pay you, whatever it takes!

But that approach is only likely to result in added time, expense, and headache for you. No matter how strongly you feel about your case, you absolutely must consider the following and discuss with your attorney:

  1. Litigation is a lengthy process – it may take years to reach a resolution at the trial court level, and then there is always the risk of appeal. Yes, years. Even if you think your case is “easy.” Remember the goal of the justice system is to reach the correct result, given certain facts and the law. Very rarely do the courts dispose of a case quickly, and it is especially so when you are the plaintiff (the side who initiates the lawsuit) because you will have the burden of proof. Most judges are also inclined to let cases drag on, in hopes that the case will settle and the judge won’t have to make a decision. If you file a lawsuit, be prepared for the long haul.
  2. Litigation is a disruptive and unpleasant process – as a business owner, you should never approach litigation as a money-making scheme. Litigation will not only require a substantial financial investment (see below), but it will also be disruptive to your business. You and your staff will need to search for and provide all relevant documents, emails, texts, phone logs, etc. as part of the discovery (or fact-finding process) to your attorney. You and your staff will have to appear for depositions (to provide testimony in this case). Then there are motion hearings and trial. If there are electronic data storage issues, you will need to retain an IT expert. All of this takes time and resources away from your business and you must do a careful cost-benefit analysis before getting involved in litigation.
  3. Litigation is an expensive process – you may easily end up paying tens of thousands of dollars to your lawyers over the course of the case. The fact-finding process that is discovery is the most costly and lengthy. Paying your attorney to attend a 5 hour deposition, review the transcript, respond to discovery requests, and craft your own discovery requests adds up very quickly. And, even if you win, YOU DO NOT GET YOUR ATTORNEY FEES PAID BY THE OTHER SIDE. The only exception to this general rule in the business world is a contract provision that expressly provides that the loser pays the winner’s attorney fees in the event of litigation. Of course, such a provision is a double-edged sword that applies to both parties.
  4. Litigation is an uncertain process – cases are rarely black and white and no attorney can predict what a judge (or jury) will do with your claim. You may have an unpredictable or eccentric judge. You may have attorneys on the other side that will make life not only difficult through discovery, but also expensive by dragging out the process. Also, even if you go to trial or win on a motion, there is always a chance for the losing party to appeal. And, if the Court of Appeals “remands” the case–meaning sends it back to the trial court with instructions–the process could very well restart and drag on for years more.

So what’s a business owner supposed to do? What are some options to enforce your contracts short of going to court? You should consult an attorney about the following options:

  • Consider pre-suit facilitation, but be mindful of the applicable statute of limitations.
  • Consider using arbitration clauses in your contracts to mandate an alternative dispute resolution process between the parties.

The unpredictability and expense of litigation also highlights the need to retain an attorney to advise your business and review any contracts before signing them.

The bottom line is a business does not make money litigating. It is a huge drain on time and resources that could be spent growing market share. If you find yourself considering litigation or on the receiving end of a lawsuit, contact an experienced business law attorney immediately for a consultation.

Contact attorney Dan Artaev today at dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Exit mobile version