Tag: gaming

Categories
business law esports gambling law gaming law internet law

International Skill-Based Real-Money Gaming: Is It Legal?

Previously, I wrote about the legality of skill-based real-money gaming in the United States. But the U.S. is not the only country where skill-based games are popular – real money competition is huge all over the world. For example, in India, skill-based gaming is not only a popular source of entertainment, but is also becoming a way to make a living. According to Ronaldo Landers, the CEO of the All India Gaming Federation, smartphone gaming has been the most significant contributor to the growth of real-money skill game business in India. That market alone is expected to gross close to $1 billion in revenue by 2025. Market studies currently estimate 350 million gamers in India and have reported a 21% increase in transaction-based gaming, with consistent growth expected in the near term.

Despite the worldwide popularity of skill-based gaming, legal compliance remains a challenge. The law is obviously different in each country and whether skill-based money games are legal depends on where you are. Sometimes there is no uniform national approach – both the United States and India regulate gaming on a regionalized state level. In India, each state has the power to make its own betting and gambling laws, which has led to a patchwork of legislation and judicial decisions. For example, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have banned all real-money games (whether gambling or skill based), Tamil Nadu permits skill games only, and Kerala has expressly banned real-money online rummy. The lack of national principles and regulations has even resulted in conflicting judicial decisions about whether poker is a skill-based or chance-based gambling game. The Gujarat and Bombay High Courts have determined that poker is a game of chance – while at the same time the Karnataka High Court has reached the opposite conclusion. To add to the confusion, the Supreme Court of India has opined that rummy is a skill game except if played for real-money stakes or if operators make a profit.

In Europe, gambling is generally governed on a national level. This means that each country has their own set of laws that define and regulate gambling. Skill-based games that fall outside the definition of gambling are permitted. For example, one popular skill-game platform active in the European Union only offers real money cash gaming in Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Luxembourg, Monaco, Netherlands, Romania, Spain, and Sweden. However, players located in France, Portugal, Italy, etc., are restricted to play for virtual “play” money only. All countries either regulate or outright prohibit gambling, so the question comes down to whether a particular skill-based game falls within that country’s definition of “gambling.” That question can only be answered by careful application of the particular country’s laws to the specific characteristics of the game.

What about cross-border play? Can a company based in the United States, India, or Germany offer games between players in different countries? It depends on where the players are located. In the United States, federal law does not prohibit skill-based real-money gaming. The most significant legislation – the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 – restricts financial transactions associated with “betting or wagering” if the “betting or wagering” is illegal where it is initiated or received. The UIGEA does not apply to most skill-based games, which are not a “game subject to chance.” But even if it involved a “bet or wager,” skill-based gaming is not unlawful in the majority of the states in the United States. So long as the bet or wager is legal in the state where it originates and in the state or country where it s received, there is no federal prohibition on the activity.

From a practical perspective, most skill-based gaming companies put the onus on the players to determine whether real-money skill-based gaming is legal in their particular jurisdiction. This is especially the case with non-U.S. based players – the terms and conditions require the end users to do their own due diligence. Of course, before a company can offer its skill-based game on a different country’s Apple App Store, the company will have to comply with that country’s specific terms and requirements. For instance, there may be geo-restriction or geo-location requirements. It is also likely that Apple (or Facebook for advertising purposes) will require a legal opinion about the legality of the game in the host country as well as the other countries where competitors are located.

Cross-border competition can be especially attractive to players looking to compete against friends and family located abroad. Gaming plays an important part in many cultures and increased accessibility through the internet and mobile app gaming presents opportunities for users to enjoy real-money gaming no matter where they are actually located. Whether celebrating the lunar new year through some fun family games or simply challenging your cousin to a $5 game of 8-ball, skill-based money games are a growing, popular market and business opportunity all over the world.

Have more questions? Need an expert legal opinion? Need help getting your app through the Facebook, Apple, or Google review process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law gambling law gaming law internet law

Mobile App Real-Money Skill Games: Google Play Says No Thanks.

The skill-based real-money gaming market is red hot in the United States, fueled in large part by the ubiquity of smart phones. We all play games on our phones and real-money gaming provides a quick, fun way to win some money for casual players. The games are not difficult to learn, offer free practice play, and have varied stakes to suit almost any level of risk tolerance. Full-scale casino apps are only available in a handful of states that have legalized full-scale online gambling, and while daily fantasy sports is more widely available, its appeal is limited. On the other hand, real-money skill-based games are available in most states. The preferred medium is the mobile app – as there are an estimated 222 million smart phones in the United States, split about 55% Android and 45% iOS. However, only Apple’s App Store offers skill-based real-money apps. Google’s Play store does not.

On March 1, 2021, Google changed its policies to allow “real-money gambling apps.” This definition expressly refers to licensed gambling products, meaning online casino apps for the few jurisdictions that have legalized online gambling. Google also allows daily fantasy sports apps that meet certain requirements. At the same time, Google expressly excludes any type of real-money skill gaming. Specifically, “we don’t allow content or services that enable or facilitate users’ ability to wager, take, or participate using real money…to obtain a prize of real monetary value. ” Critics have pointed to the fact that this encourages “sideloading,” (downloading the app through a website, as opposed to the official app store) which presents potential security risks and opens the door for true scams. Google’s policy also makes it more difficult for international companies to enter the U.S. skill-based market, as consumers may be even more reluctant to “sideload” an app from a foreign website, even if they would otherwise get the app through the Google Play store. At the same time, Google’s position is explained by the lack of clear regulation for real-money skill-based gaming. Google clearly does not want to police or vet the various iterations of skill-based games or review them for state-specific legality. Instead, it is relying on state licensing to authorize real money gaming. This position excludes most real-money games that are neither licensed nor regulated under most states’ laws.

Apple’s App Store Review Guidelines remain the same. “Apps that offer real money gaming…must have necessary licensing and permission in the location where the app is used, must be geo-restricted to those locations.” For real-money skill-based games that do not need a special license in about 80% of the United States (because they do not depend on “chance” and are not otherwise regulated), this is a green light to make their apps available on the App Store. There are many such games available in the App Store, including hundreds of titles offered through the Skillz.com platform, which is a large California-based, publicly-traded company. For the time being, Apple seems comfortable with hosting real-money skill-based gaming, so long as the developers comply with the geolocation requirements and are only operating in those states where a license is not required.

Developers looking to distribute their games in the United States should look toward iOS for the time being. The legitimacy of “official” app store distribution is especially valuable in the real-money gaming market. Note that Apple still requires “geo-restricting” to those jurisdictions where the app is legal. Federal law does not regulate most skill-based real-money gaming, but the state-level analysis remains unsettled. In fact, even the large industry participants like Skillz, WorldWinner, and others cannot agree on a uniform list of states where their products are legal. In other words, if you are operating unregulated and without a license, you must absolutely consult with a legal expert and determine your risk tolerance before defining your geolocation parameters.

Have more questions? Do you need help getting your app through the review process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law esports gambling law gaming law internet law

Real-Money Skill Gaming in the U.S: Is Your Game More Fantasy Sports or Pure Contest?

In 2021, there are many opportunities to play games for real money online, even if your particular state does not offer full-scale online casino operations. Daily Fantasy Sports (or “DFS”) is one hugely popular entertainment option. Real-money pure-skill contests are another. Video game tournaments, leaderboards, and prize pools are also available, as well as countless other options. Entrepreneurs all over the world want to enter the red-hot United States gaming market, but need to understand the legal nuances in order to effectively distribute their product and avoid legal issues with regulators, banks, and app platforms like the Apple App Store.

With skill-based games, it is important whether your game is more like fantasy sports or whether it a pure-skill contest. This distinction is critical because it determines where your game is legal (and whether you need a license) – and also affects your tax obligations to the IRS.

The following chart illustrates the three categories of games and the applicable regulations:

Description/type of gameCategoryRegulations
Players determine the amount of the wager and may apply certain level of skill to increase odds of winning (like hit or stay in blackjack), but odds always against the player. Winner is determined primarily by chance or chance is the dominant factor in determining outcome. Game is similar to a casino game like slots, blackjack, keno, or bingo. Game is a poker-like game. Game features a random mechanism, like a shuffled deck of cards, roll of the dice, or a spinning wheel. Bet is on the result of a single athletic competition, event, or performance of a single player.GamblingHighly regulated, illegal and criminalized activity (without a license)in all 50 states. Federal law also applies, including the monetary transaction restrictions through the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (“UIGEA”).
Players pay an entry fee, and then use research, data analysis, or other skill to build a team or portfolio to compete against other player-chosen teams or portfolios. Points or scores assigned based on real-life performance. Player does not control the performance of the players, stocks, currencies, or other portfolio components. Real-world events determine outcome. Similar to fantasy sports or a fantasy league. Prize pool must be known and fixed ahead of time.FantasyFantasy sports are expressly excluded from the scope of the UIGEA. Fantasy sports and leagues are permitted in about 80% of the states, but license and revenue tax is required in some. IRS views fantasy wagers as gambling bets and no different than sportsbook betting for tax purposes. Potential exposure to excise tax for providers.
Players pay an entry fee into a sports tournament or skill contest for the chance to win a prize (whether cash or otherwise) based on their own participation. Players determine the outcome through pure skill, such as strength, speed, agility, mental knowledge, mental quickness, or other physical or mental factor. Chance has minimal or no role in the outcome. Head-to-head games of timed solitaire, chess, checkers, blockbuster, Tetris-like puzzle games. Trivia contests. Most video game tournaments. Golf or tennis tournaments, hole-in-one contests.Pure Skill ContestUnregulated and not considered gambling in about 80% of the states. Regulated pursuant to license or outright prohibited in the remaining states. Not regulated under federal law. The IRS does not consider entry fees or skill wagers to be gambling bets.
Copyright 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All Rights Reserved. May not be reproduced without the express written permission of the author.

As a gaming company providing a new product, you obviously want to steer clear of classification as a gambling game. Unless you are a licensed casino (or working in partnership with a licensed casino) in one of the few states that have legalized online gambling, real-money gambling games are illegal. Not only do you risk fines and prosecution from state and federal law enforcement, but you will not be able to pass Apple or Google’s app vetting process, advertise on Facebook, or use a mainstream payment processor like PayPal.

Skill-based real money games are those where the outcome is not determined by chance. These games fall either into the “fantasy sports” or “pure skill contest” categories. In either category, the argument is that where chance is not a dominant factor, the game is skill-based and falls outside the definition of regulated “gambling.” Many real-money skill-based gaming platforms have adopted this “if it is not prohibited, then it is legal” approach to offer their products in about 80% of the United States. But there is a difference between the so-called “fantasy sports” and “pure skill contest” categories. The first difference is regulatory – state law treats “fantasy sports” and “pure skill contests” differently.

To fully understand the difference, it is important to know that the “it’s not gambling” argument is not new. In the early 21st century, it was widely used by online poker providers and then daily fantasy sports operators. Recall that between the early 2000s and 2011, Texas Hold’em became huge in the U.S., helped by online pioneers like PokerStars and PartyPoker that allowed anyone to play online poker from anywhere. ESPN was airing the World Series of Poker as part of its routine sports coverage. The 2006 James Bond franchise reboot Casino Royale even focused on high-stakes no-limit hold’em (as opposed to Baccarat in Ian Fleming’s original book treatment).

The primary argument for legality was that poker is a game of skill, not chance, and therefore not gambling. Advocates pointed to the fact that skilled poker players were consistently able to beat their opponents, even though the game did involve the element of chance with a random shuffle of a card deck. In response to growing concern about unregulated real-money poker, a number of courts concluded that chance played a significant role in the outcome and Texas Hold’em is indeed gambling. The federal government took further regulatory action by enacting the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (“UIGEA”). The UIGEA essentially killed off any off-shore poker and other grey-market online gambling operations by targeting U.S. banks and payment providers and prohibiting them from facilitating wagering transactions. Those providers that continued to offer U.S. players real money poker games were shut down through federal law enforcement action on so-called “Black Friday,” April 15, 2011, and their executives charged with a number of felonies, including money laundering and fraud.

Daily Fantasy Sports emerged as an entertainment alternative around 2007 and relied on the same “it’s not gambling” argument as poker. Players would stake real money for a chance to play in a fantasy sports contest, where they would set a daily lineup of their own fantasy team and compete against others for the highest score. The highest score or scores would be awarded cash prizes. DFS relied on the definition of “bet or wager” in the UIGEA that expressly excluded fantasy sports contests. But, just because DFS is not illegal under the federal UIGEA (and MasterCard or Discover can process the associated wagering transaction) does not mean it is automatically legal. Some states concluded outright that DFS is “gambling” and is illegal. Others enacted legislation that DFS is not gambling. And some have done nothing at all. Thus, DFS offerings vary state-by-state: as of the date of this article, DraftKings and FanDuel both offer DFS in 41 of the 50 states. But DFS law is far from settled and remains in a state of flux; for example, in New York, DFS was authorized by the state legislature, but a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the law is pending on appeal. Texas is another example – in 2016, the Texas attorney general issued an opinion that DFS is illegal gambling, but both FanDuel and DraftKings continue to offer DFS in Texas pending the final outcome of various lawsuits.

On the other hand, games that are head-to-head contests of pure skill are legal in most states because they fall outside the state’s definition of “gambling.” These games – whether online or in person – allow participants to pay an entry fee and compete for a prize (monetary or otherwise). Even if the game is played on a smartphone, it is no different than paying a fee to play in a money tennis or golf tournament. Or paying an entry fee to participate in an arm wrestling contest at the state fair. In fact, certain states expressly exclude so-called “bona fide contests of strength, skill, or speed” from the definition of gambling, provided that the only persons making the wagers are the participants themselves. But although the analysis seems straightforward, providers of pure-skill contests disagree about where exactly real money games are legal. Various platforms have different lists of “restricted jurisdictions,” demonstrating their different tolerance for risk, and that the law remains unsettled in this area.

The second difference between fantasy and pure skill is tax treatment. Under the Internal Revenue Code, gambling winnings are taxable income, but may be offset by gambling losses. In 2020, the IRS decided that wagers made on DFS constituted a “wagering transaction” (i.e. gambling) under Section 165(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and the Tax Court agreed. This ruling was consistent with another 2020 internal IRS memo that concluded DFS wagers were subject to an excise tax, which is normally applied to wagers made at sportsbooks. The IRS’s analysis and conclusion that DFS is essentially the same as sports gambling has significant legal implications. Not only does it potentially expose DFS providers to millions of dollars in unpaid excise tax liability, but it is also an indicator of how the nature of the game may determine the outcome of “is it gambling” analysis. A game could very well be “gambling” for tax purposes, but at the same time “not gambling” under a state’s definition of “gambling.”

The skill-based gaming market is an attractive, fast-growing industry in the United States. However, it is also plagued by an uncertain legal landscape and inconsistent treatment at the federal and state level. Tax implications are also something to consider when designing your game. Whether you are a start-up or a well-established company looking to introduce a new game product, Artaev at Law can provide you with consulting and legal analysis required to do it right.

Have more questions? Do you need help getting your app through the Apple, Google, or Facebook review process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law gambling law gaming law internet law

Is Playing Video Games for Real Money Legal? It May Depend on the Game.

Skill-based real-money gaming is a growing industry worldwide. Previously, I wrote about the legality of playing casual games like Solitaire and bingo derivatives for real money. But what about console or PC games like FIFA ‘21, NHL ‘21, Madden ‘21, NBA2K21, and PGA2K21? Shooters like Call of Duty, CS:GO, and Fortnite? Strategy card games like Magic the Gathering? Can those be played for real money as well?

We are not talking the official in-game cash cups or periodic tournament that a few games offer. Rather, head-to-head real money competition that makes any game a chance to win (or lose) cash. There is no shortage of websites and apps offering players this very service. The chance to wager real money on head-to-head video game contests or play in cash-prize leagues and tournaments is certainly attractive. But whenever there is any sort of betting or wagering, legal issues may come up. As a player, you want to make sure you are not breaking the law by wagering $5 on a Sunday Madden round robin. As an entrepreneur and app developer, you need to know what you can and cannot offer to your audience or how to plan for and resolve potential legal issues.

There are two distinct problems areas in the real-money gaming sector. First, is playing video games for real money considered illegal gambling?

Each of the 50 U.S. states has its own set of laws that define “gambling” and that definition determines whether real money playing video games for real money. Do not assume that a platform or app is legal just because it is not traditional, casino-style “gambling.”

You may have heard that if a game’s outcome depends on skill rather than chance, then it is not “gambling” and therefore allowed. This is false. Each of the 50 states have their own regulatory scheme for gambling and gaming, and while some states only regulate games where chance is the dominant factor (in other words, casino-style gambling), not all have the same laws. Certain states define gambling independent of whether chance or skill determines the outcome. They simply make it illegal to wager money in exchange for the possibility of winning money. Other states expressly regulate “games of skill,” either independently or as part of recent internet gambling legislation.

Note that even if a state allows participants to wager real money on a game of skill for a chance to win cash prizes, wagering on the gameplay of others is prohibited. Wagering on the play of others is akin to a sportsbook, which are tightly regulated as gambling across the board.

The gambling vs. game of skill analysis also depends on the particular game at issue. Some games are pure skill with no element of chance – such a game that pits two identical soccer squads against each other. Others have some element of chance, but the skill predominates over the outcome. For example, Fortnite has an element of chance (even presuming you are matched with players of equal skill) because the loot is randomized and the bus approaches the map from different directions, giving an element of luck at least at the start. Then there are games like Magic: The Gathering and Hearthstone or any other game that features cards and a random shuffle mechanism. While better players will certainly win over time, the randomness of the shuffle does affect the outcome. Thus, the specific nature of the game played also determines the legality of the wager on a state-by-state basis. Note that official in-game tournaments always have a “void where prohibited” disclaimer and generally do not require a real-money entry fee to participate to avoid legal issues.

The second problem is intellectual property rights – specifically the game copyrights and trademarks owned by studios like EA and Epic.

Game studios generally do not endorse any websites or apps that allow real-money wagering on their games. In fact, such wagering providers may face copyright or trademark infringement lawsuits from the game developer for misusing their intellectual property.

Many third-party wagering sites use the logos or cover art from the games that they support, but not many have the license or permission to do so. From a trademark perspective, the game studios could have a brand confusion claim, as players may assume that the game makers themselves endorse these wagering sites. The fine print (that nobody reads) disclaiming any endorsement is unlikely to prevent a trademark infringement action. Game developers spend millions of dollars on cultivating their image and will not hesitate to file a lawsuit to protect the integrity of their brand.

The game studios also own the copyright to their games, which means they get to control how their products are used, distributed, and portrayed. At least one studio, Epic Games, has publicly stated that any website or app that facilitates wagering on any of its games (including Fortnite) is violating Epic’s IP rights. Video game publishers – especially those that market to the under-18 crowd – do not want to be associated with anything that could be viewed as gambling (even if it is not gambling under the law). It is likely that there are lawsuits coming to protect the games’ “family-friendly” image and reassure parents that video games are a safe and wholesome hobby. It is also unlikely that any game studio – at least any major game studio – will enter into a licensing deal with a wagering website to specifically support real-money wagering on gameplay.

Plus, some studios themselves offer cash and prize competitions. For example, Fortnite hosts its own real money prize events. Call of Duty has league play. Magic: The Gathering periodically does an Arena tournament that awards a cash prize to the top players. “Official” competitions let the studios control their own IP and not have to share revenue and player base with any third parties. Further, most official competitions do not require a real-money buy-in to participate, making them more “family-friendly.”

There is no doubt that real-money skill gaming is a big draw worldwide, especially with the ubiquity of smartphones and fast cellular connections. Potential legal issues are there as well, and the wrong approach will attract the attention of local law enforcement and civil intellectual property lawyers. To add to the uncertainty, the United States is a dual-sovereign system, with regulations both on the federal level (that mainly affect the banking aspect of wagering) and the state level (that are constantly changing). Tread carefully and hire a lawyer.

Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law esports gaming law

Esports. So Hot Right now: Advice from an Esports Attorney for Players and Teams.

Metro Detroit is uniquely poised to become the next epicenter of a growing industry: Professional competitive video gaming, or simply esports. An emerging and growing form of entertainment, the Michigan esports scene is rooted in its strong high school and collegiate programs. Professional esports actually had its first major metro Detroit debut August 2019, when Little Caesars Arena hosted the League of Legends Championship Series summer finals. Detroit’s storied sports history, as well as its growing reputation as a technological pioneer made it particularly attractive to Riot Games when it decided to bring this event to the Motor City.

The tournament attracted more than 10,000 live fans to the city and the arena, with tens of thousands more watching a stream on Twitch. Metro Detroit is also home to gaming lounges, arcade bars. Since 2019, the pandemic obviously shifted demand away from in-person events, but fans still continue to follow their favorite players remotely. California remains the epicenter (no earthquake pun intended) of the American video game industry, which is still dwarfed by the Asian market. Still, there is a robust esports community in Michigan, which bodes well for Michigan continuing to attract professional events and business in the future.

Despite the industry’s potential, there are no dedicated esports law firms or esports lawyers in Michigan, and Artaev at Law is the only Michigan law firm that specializes in video game law. If you search for “Michigan gaming lawyer,” the results come up for casino gaming lawyers, which is probably not the type of gaming you are looking for.

Why do you need a lawyer in the first place? Professional esports, like professional football, tennis, baseball, etc., is a legal minefield for the unwary. Intellectual property issues are front and center. Contract law and employment law concerns abound. Additionally, esports participants and professionals tend to be younger, often without professional representation, and especially vulnerable to predatory market practices. The unique nature of the industry and legal issues facing participants also requires specialized knowledge base and background from your lawyer.

Get someone who knows both the law and video games. The classic “Legend of Zelda” line rings true: It’s dangerous to go alone! Take this (advice):

  • Before signing ANY contract with ANY team, sponsor, representative, etc., consult with an attorney. It is a worthwhile investment in your future and you must understand all of the rights, costs, and benefits that you are agreeing to. Obtaining a professional consultation before you enter an agreement is far cheaper than trying to get out of a contract after the fact or worse, having to defend against a lawsuit for breaching that contract.
  • An esports attorney can act as your agent and advise you regarding things like your rights and obligations, contract termination, payments, taxes, and other legal aspects. An esports attorney can help you protect your career, revenue stream, and potential winnings, while you can completely focus on the gaming and building your brand.
  • Do not assume that because you are part of a school team that you are automatically protected. Professional esports is all about money and like any other industry, it is a business first. Treat your involvement just like you would any other serious business transaction.
  • Merchandising and general intellectual property are big money, but often overlooked. As a pro gamer, you will likely receive a salary, but you also stand to make a lot of money through sponsorship. For example, if Mountain Dew calls you up and offers big money to drink their products during your live stream, who owns those rights? Who gets the money?
  • Like with any business, the more it grows the more trouble it attracts. Did you create a signature kill shot or a unique move that gained you 1,000 new followers on Twitch? What rights do own to that creation? What about your unique online persona? What happens to your creations after you sign a professional contract or a sponsorship deal?
  • Another question that will come up sooner rather later is how to deal with the social media aspects – especially the negative trolls. Can you send “cease-and-desist” letters? What legal options do you have when someone defames you online?

Video games are big business and are a growing sector of the entertainment world. The $1 billion (plus) global industry is continuing to expand worldwide, including to Metro Detroit. The emerging market means there are more players, more teams, more brands, and more potential pitfalls than ever before.

Have more questions? Contact Michigan’s video game lawyer Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com or 269-930-0254 with any questions and professional representation in the esports or video game industry.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
esports gaming law

FAQ: Can Playing Music on Twitch Get Me Sued?

Photo by EVG Culture on Pexels.com

Yes it can. As the popularity of internet streaming soars, content creators are encountering unique legal issues related to the media that they use. In June 2020, Twitch received thousands of so-called “takedown notices” under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) related to multiple archived clips that contain copyrighted music. The Recording Industry Association of America (“RIAA”) owns the copyrights to many popular songs and is responsible for this DMCA blitz. This situation has prompted many questions from the streamer community, and so I have created this FAQ in response. If you have more specific questions regarding your situation, please reach out directly to set up a personalized consultation.

Q: What exactly is the issue with playing music that I paid for?

A: The issue is copyright law and the fact that that most streamers don’t have the right license. When you purchase a CD, download a song from iTunes, or subscribe to Spotify, you are only buying a personal use license for the songs. Remember how making bootleg CDs is “piracy” and illegal? That’s because your “ownership” of a song does not include the right to reproduce it. It also does not include the right to play the music for the public. When you hear music a gym, restaurant, or retail store, they have obtained special “public performance” licenses, which are more expensive.

Q: Are they really going to sue me? Even if I’m not making any money?

A: They might. Under U.S. copyright law, the copyright owner may sue to get an injunction (an order to stop doing something from the court), and in addition to actual damages, get statutory damages, as well as costs and their attorney fees. Under the law, infringement is still infringement even without profit or monetary gain. If a court finds that the infringement was willful, statutory damages can be up to $150,000.00. Also, under the Twitch terms of service, three DMCA notices against your account is grounds for a permanent ban from the platform.

Q: Why is Twitch so concerned with what I am doing?

A: Because they may be liable as the host of the copyrighted content. Under the DMCA, Twitch can avoid liability as the host if they act in response to a “takedown notice.” That is why they have been actively mandating mass clip deletions in response to the DMCA notices they have received. It is generally easier for a copyright holder to target the host like Twitch or YouTube than the streamer. The host has incentive to act in order to take advantage of the “safe harbor” under the DMCA, and if the host doesn’t act, the host has money to pay any adverse judgment obtained by the owner of the copyright.

Q: Isn’t my playing music “fair use”?

A: Probably not. The “fair use” exception to copyright infringement generally protects reproduction for criticism, comment, educational use, news reporting, scholarship, or research. When music is played to accompany a streamer’s gameplay, the music is not being used for any of these purposes. Whether or not something is “fair use” is a fact-specific inquiry, but generally playing a soundtrack to your gameplay is not going to be considered fair use.

Q: Isn’t the video game itself also protected under copyright law? Do I need a special license to stream the game itself?

A: The game content itself is protected by copyright, but streaming it probably qualifies as “fair use” and is protected from infringement actions. Most streamers commentate or critique their gameplay or the gameplay of others, so arguably the use of copyrighted content meets the factors listed in 17 USC 107. Essentially, sharing copyrighted content is the base of the entire streaming industry.

However, as Wisconsin attorney Matthew Harding pointed out to me, the issue is far from settled. On one hand, Amazon’s multi-billion dollar acquisition of Twitch, as well as eight-figure exclusive streaming contracts with top-tier talent, indicate that the industry is confident in its fair use argument against any game companies that would target the game itself. On the other hand, there are prominent industry figures that believe streaming video game content is not fair use and could be targeted via DMCA take-down notice, much like unlicensed music. Mr. Harding also observed that any company that targets streamers of its games with copyright infringement lawsuits or takedown notices will face significant backlash from the community, but the bottom line is that the publisher still owns the copyright and is entitled to enforce the exclusive rights that are attached to that copyright by law.

Q: I’m confused. I have seen rhythm and music game streamers get taken down – why are they not protected by “fair use”?

A: As stated in the response to the previous question, the “fair use” issue is not settled. In fact, each “fair use” situation is fact specific, but it is likely that these rhythm or music game players are not using the copyrighted work for commentary or criticism purposes. It is not enough to simply broadcast yourself playing the game. Running commentary or criticism is needed to make a plausible “fair use” argument.

Q: As a streamer, what can I do?

A: Twitch is actively working to give its streamers options. Recently, it has launched Soundtrack – a product that allows streamers to run a separate music channel during the broadcast. The artists and labels available are limited, but gives indie artists more potential exposure. Of course, the RIAA is fighting Twitch on this product too, claiming that Twitch needs synchronization and mechanical licenses for its Soundtrack tool. The fight continues.

Also, there is a number of websites that sell royalty-free licenses. For example, Tunepocket offers memberships that give streamers access to a range of music and sound effects specifically for public performance.

Q: I am a podcaster. Can I play music during my podcast?

A: Unless you hold the copyright to the music (i.e. it’s original) or have the right license, no. You face the same issue as streamers do when they play music in the background of their game streams. Music you buy on iTunes or stream through Spotify is not licensed for public performance like your podcast.

Dan Artaev is an experienced attorney who is an avid gamer and who has advised gaming companies regarding various legal issues, including intellectual property rights. Have more questions? Contact Dan by email at dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
gambling law gaming law

Fun Facts About the History of the World’s Oldest Hobby: Gambling.

For a change of pace, here is some short and fun reading about everyone’s favorite hobby – gambling. Whenever I do a gambling-related legal project or research, it amazes me how much time and effort has been spent by lawmakers across the United States regulating and restricting gambling in all its forms. And, it is equally amazing how much time and effort has been spent by people to evade those restrictions by designing every sort of workaround imaginable. The battle continues in the age of the Internet and evolves with each technological advance, with mobile gaming being the latest front.

The history of gaming and gambling is fascinating. For as long as people have been playing games, they have bet money on them. According to “The History of Backgammon” by Oswald Jacoby, the world’s original dice game (with dice carved from actual bones) was played as early as 3000 B.C. in southern Mesopotamia (modern day Iraq). Backgammon boards were found in King Tut’s tomb that date back to 1500 B.C., and evidence exists that Ancient Egyptians played for money and even designed an elaborate mechanical dice box to protect against cheaters. Real-money gaming was huge in the Roman Empire, both among royalty and ordinary Romans. Nero (among his other excesses) is said to have played a version of backgammon for an equivalent of $15,000 per point and Emperor Commodius turned the imperial palace into a grandiose casino. Wall paintings in Pompeii depict scenes of ordinary Romans playing in inns, arguing over a backgammon board, and being promptly thrown out by the innkeeper. Suddenly naming one of Las Vegas’s most popular casinos “Caesar’s Palace” makes sense.

Backgammon and gambling in general were so historically popular and addictive, that during the Third Crusade in 1190, Richard the First and his allies issued a joint proclamation that prohibited playing any game for money for any person “beneath the degree of a knight.” Knights and clergymen were permitted to gamble, but were restricted to losing no more than 20 shillings per day, with strict penalties for exceeding the limit, including being flogged naked through the army for 3 days. Sports betting dates back at least to Ancient Greece, where betting on the original Olympics was widespread.

Today, there are so many iterations, versions, and types games that people wager on, it is no wonder that each of the 50 United States has an extensive statutory scheme addressing gambling. Courts all over the U.S. have thousands of pages of options dating back more than a hundred years dedicated to analyzing various devices to determine whether they are prohibited “gambling devices.” Did you know that pinball machines were originally restricted as gambling devices and there remain detailed regulations in each state as to the maximum number of free games that a pinball machine can award? But that’s a topic for another day.

Despite heavy regulation, gambling and betting remain extremely popular across the world. The modern global casino industry is estimated to be worth in excess of $100 billion, with steady and continued growth expected. The sports betting market, which is tracked separately, is valued at approximately $85 billion worldwide. According to analysis by Morgan Stanley, the U.S. sports betting market is projected to grow from $833 million in 2019 to $7 to $8 billion by 2025. Although COVID-19 dropped casino and gambling related revenues by over 10% in the United States in 2020, the market is still expected to recover and grow robustly in the foreseeable future. Indeed, latest data indicates better-than-expected revenues in the gaming industry in 2020, as many people are turning to gaming (both video games and gambling) as entertainment, social interaction, and an escape from the stresses of daily life. Stay tuned.

Dan Artaev is an experienced attorney who has advised domestic and international clients regarding gambling regulations, legislation, and provided other gambling- and gaming-related representation. Contact Dan by email at dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law esports gaming law

A Lesson in Licenses and Why You Own Nothing.

In 2019, Fortnite went offline. No one could play, stream, compete, or access their account. This was part of an in-game “event” known as the Fortnite Blackout or The End. Can Epic Games do that? What rights do you even have as a player, team owner, or competitor? It all comes down to the End User License Agreement (EULA) – so leave it to a gaming lawyer to use Fortnite to teach you about the critical role of licensing in the digital age!

By way of background, Fortnite is certainly one of the most –if not the most popular video game in the world. The game, which is available as free download on modern consoles, PCs, and even iPhones, is a hit with kids, teens, adults, professional athletes, celebrities, and even Prince Harry (the Duke of Sussex) who got so addicted that he called for the game to be banned in Britain. True story. It has also evolved into an international eSport phenomenon, with this year’s World Cup Finals winner taking home a cool $3 million check. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of professional gamers and streamers across the world that make this game their career. Epic Games, the game’s owner and creator, is estimated to have earned between $2.4 and $3 billion from the game in 2018 alone. This is particularly impressive given that the game is free to download and play, with all of the revenue coming from in-game cosmetic content, such as different character outfits.

Now imagine if one day all of that was suddenly gone. Epic shuts down the servers and Fortnite no longer exists. Well, this actually happened (at least for about 24 hours)–during the Fortnite Blackout or The End event. The hundreds of hours you spent playing, earning points, and ranking? Gone. Did you spend all of your birthday money on new outfits so you could look like a James Bond villain in the game? Gone. Even worse if you are a professional gamer who made Fortnite a career. Or a team owner who invested hundreds of thousands of dollars into building the next world champion. What can you do? Who can you sue?

The simple answer is NOTHING and NO ONE. Because you have to understand licensing. And the fact that the traditional concepts of ownership–i.e. I pay money for something therefore I own it–do not transfer to the digital world. Did you read the EULA that you have to accept before logging into Fortnite? I didn’t think so. Yet it contains important rights and obligations–especially if you play professionally. The reality is, by playing Fortnite and even paying real money to “buy” in-game characters, weapons, etc., you own nothing. In simple terms, Epic Games grants you a license to play the game at its sole discretion, but Epic Games owns and controls everything and anything within the game, even the content that you paid real money for.

The Fortnite EULA is a license, which is a right to do something, or access something. Think of it like a ticket to go see a football game or a concert, but in this case it is a ticket that gives you access to a video game. In legal terms, what distinguishes a license is the fact that it is a “revocable” right, meaning the licensor (the owner of the license) can terminate the licensee’s rights of access at any time, subject to any conditions of the license. So what terms do you agree to when playing Fortnite?

Epic grants you a “personal, non-exclusive…limited right and license to install and use the Software…for you personal entertainment use.” Also, ” The Software is licensed, not sold, to you under the License. The License does not grant you any title or ownership in the Software. ” Ok, but can Epic just shut down the game? Yes–read on–” You also acknowledge that any character data, game progress, game customization or other data related to your use of the Software or Services may cease to be available to you at any time without notice from Epic….”

What about all the real money you paid for skins, custom characters, etc.? You get that back, right? Nope. Read on–” Epic, in its sole discretion, has the absolute right to manage, modify, substitute, replace, suspend, cancel or eliminate Game Currency or Content, including your ability to access or use Game Currency or Content, without notice or liability to you.” Meaning, you do not really own any “game currency” or the “content” that you bought–in fact, all you are acquiring when you are “purchasing in-game content” is another license to use the currency or the content that you purchase with the currency for as long as Epic wants.

It’s not really so confusing. When you downloaded and played Fortnite, you agreed that Epic owns everything and you own nothing. If you paid any money to Epic for skin or custom parachute, Epic gave you a license to use that particular skin or parachute. You paid for the “experience”–not a tangible item itself. That’s licensing.

Of course, this reality creates a whole host of follow-up questions. What happens to content I create using Fortnite’s creative mode? Does Epic own that too? Short answer is YES. What about streamers who make a living playing Fortnite? Professional gamers? Team owners? Fortnite World Cup sponsors? There is no easy answer there, as each situation is fact-specific and depends on the various terms of the license agreements, any sponsorship agreements, intellectual property law, etc.

The Fortnite Blackout was a lesson in “ownership” in the digital age. Traditional concepts of ownership do not apply or transfer to to the digital realm. Music, video, games, and even photos that you upload or post on social media–are not “yours” in the traditional sense. Rather, there is an increasingly complex web of rights that becomes even more complex when gaming is a business.

So, like any business owner, if you are investing time, money, and effort into a game–with the idea to play professionally, make streaming revenue, or to otherwise make it in the gaming business–engage and consult with an eSports attorney. Understanding your rights and obligations will help you craft an effective business strategy going forward, and plan for contingencies and er…singularities.

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com or 269-930-0254 to set up your free initial consultation.

© 2020 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Exit mobile version