Tag: crypto law

Categories
business law internet law Uncategorized

DePIN Networks and Utility Tokens: Legal Considerations for the Physical Applications of Blockchain Technology.

black satellite tower under blue skies
Photo by Sparsh Karki on Pexels.com

Imagine creating a product that sells data, such as a mapping or telecommunications service. These are capital-intensive businesses with immense startup costs. Barriers to entry may seem insurmountable – after all, if you wanted to compete with Verizon or AT&T, the cost and availability of cell phone towers alone would be cost-prohibitive. Same with competing against Google Maps or Apple. It is essentially impossible for a startup to compete with companies that are effectively public utilities.

How is DePIN useful and what are some examples?

Enter decentralization. While currently associated with largely speculative financial transactions and niche non-fungible token (NFT) projects, decentralized/permissionless networks have great potential to expand beyond the merely virtual and into the physical space. The Helium communications network and Hivemapper’s mapping data services are just two great examples. Helium crowdsources its network by leasing physical space to install its smaller, lower-powered antennae. Instead of 400-foot massive, high-watt cell towers, the network runs on hundreds or even thousands of densely distributed smaller transmitters. Helium’s own cryptocurrency (HNT) comes in as a rewards system – for installing an antenna, passing proof of service tests, and increased use of the particular location, the landlord earns Helium tokens (HNT) (or associated IOT or MOBILE tokens), which can then be sold or exchanged on the open market. Locations that are used more frequently earn more tokens, incentivizing the optimal location and operation through economics principles.

Hivemapper works in a similar manner, but with road mapping. Hivemapper sells its proprietary dashcams, which users can buy, install, and use to collect data from their vehicles, which is then uploaded in exchange for HONEY tokens. Like HNT, HONEY can be sold or traded on an exchange. The benefit to Hivemapper is that it essentially collects data in exchange for self-created tokens and sells dashcamps on top. Hivemapper does not invest in significant infrastructure, like Google’s mapping cars or their specialized cameras. Hivemapper instead recruits – and decentralizes – the process for collecting road data that would otherwise be cost prohibitive. As an additional efficiency, this results in more up-to-date road data, as it is collected from more sources than a single Google Maps car that drives through a particular route on an infrequent basis.

This application (and benefits) of decentralization and crowdsourcing to data collection and aggregation, as well as other physical applications are significant. For example, a company could use a decentralized token incentive structure to collect environmental or weather data, which then could be sold to private parties for development purposes, aid in agriculture, and otherwise create significant inexpensive, up-to-date data aggregation. Social science applications abound, as a company could incentivize information gathering and consensus-based verification with a properly-designed token system.

DePIN must still comply with existing physical and financial regulations.

While novel, DePINs must still fit into the existing physical and financial regulatory schemes. For example, Helium’s network must comport with FCC standards on communications devices, radio frequencies, transmission power, and other administrative matters. Further, the fact that companies like Hivemapper and Helium essentially create their own currency, must also fit into existing securities and money transmission laws, both on a federal and state-by-state level. Companies cannot simply raise funds through initial coin offerings and bypass normal securities regulations. If selling tokens, companies must engage in Security Token Offerings (or STOs), which are conducted similar to private placements and disclosed on Form D with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Otherwise, companies may structure their tokens as “utility” tokens, which means that consumption (and not investment or speculation) must be the primary motivation for the purchase. For instance, if users who earned the HONEY token could consume that token and use it to pay for a Hivemapper premium subscription (giving themselves access to premium map and road condition content for example), the HONEY token would likely be classified as a “utility” token and not fall into the “investment contract” designation under the Howey test.

How do utility tokens fit into the DePIN economy?

A “utility” token with non-investment or consumptive utility is essential to a DePIN ecosystem. However, this is also problematic, as essentially the company must not only pay out a token like HNT in exchange for data and bandwidth, but also accept HNT as payment for tangible services. From a company perspective, the tangible services cost fiat dollars – capital and labor cannot be purchased for a manufactured token. Further, the price of a token like HNT is hardly stable. HNT currently trades at about $6.60 to HNT. In November 2021, HNT traded for over $50 per HNT. Unstable token prices limit the consumptive use of cryptocurrencies and tokens, making them more suitable for long-term holding or short-term speculation. Further, it is tempting for a startup to simply issue tokens to raise capital – under the guise of a future consumptive use or simply the “this will go up in value as we expand” argument. This reality defeats the non-investment utility argument and renders tokens susceptible to classification as unregistered securities.

Companies have attempted to address these issues through use of associated tokens (IOT and MOBILE are directly earned by Helium network or hotspot hosts, the burn-and-mint protocol, use of “data credits” or “map credits,” and various fees. For example, Filecoin, a decentralized file handling platform, collects base fees for storage deals, batch fees for adding storage capacity, overestimation fees that related to optimized gas usage (gas being the cost of transacting the cryptocurrency), and penalty fees collected from those who do not provide storage as promised. Those who want to store data using Filecoin pay fees in FIL. FIL is also the reward paid out to those who provide storage or retrieval services on the Filecoin network.

What are specific legal challenges facing DePIN projects?

While innovative, DePIN businesses face an uncertain regulatory landscape, particularly in the United States. At a minimum, a business considering DePIN should consider the following:

  1. Physical regulatory considerations – are there zoning laws, telecommunications regulations, licensing requirements, or other physical considerations that affect my business?
  2. Legal liability – what are my obligations to the persons who contribute to my network or project? Are they contractors or employees? Are there any insurance or liability risks that I need to cover through contracts or terms of use?
  3. Financial legality – is my token really a “utility” token for consumptive non-investment use? How is my token created? How is it used? Is that use supportable under the current regulatory framework and the Howey test?

Some commentators predict that DePIN will be the next big thing in crypto and lead to mass adoption of decentralized blockchains in day-to-day business and life. The benefits are easy to see: lower costs, greater accessibility, crowdsourced reliability, security. However, there are also many complex legal regulatory considerations. Contact the experienced attorneys at Artaev at Law PLLC for a consultation about your next big project.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2024 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law internet law

Stablecoins 101: What Are They, How Are They Taxed, and Can I Use Them In My Business?

Cryptocurrency has significant business utility, especially in international transactions. Companies can exchange funds directly, without wiring fees or banking delays, and easily convert their native currencies into crypto and vice-versa using a mobile phone. However, traditional cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are extremely volatile and their exchange values can easily fluctuate 10-20% or more in a matter of days or even hours. Market supply and demand forces determine the prices of these most popular cryptocurrencies and their value is particularly sensitive to various external factors. Events like China’s crypto clampdown, significant buys or sells by capital investors, or even Elon Musk’s tweets can crash the market or send the price of crypto soaring. Obviously, price volatility makes businesses and consumers reluctant to adopt these cryptocurrencies for day-to-day transactions. Price volatility translates into purchasing power uncertainty, which in turn devalues the currency.

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that try to solve the volatility problem. They do so by pegging their price to the price of another asset (such as the U.S. Dollar or an ounce of gold). For example, the USD Coin (USDC) can be acquired and sold for U.S. Dollars on a 1 to 1 ratio. USDC is actually backed by existing dollar reserves, meaning that each USDC has a real-world dollar counterpart held by regulated financial institutions. USDC reserves are also periodically verified by a third party (but not audited).

There are other stablecoins as well, for example Tether, Binance USD, TrueUSD, DAI, and more. Like USDC, some are tied 1 to 1 to U.S. Dollar reserves. Others are backed by commodities like gold, silver, or oil. The price of a commodity-backed stablecoin is tied to the market price of a commodity unit, like an ounce of gold. There are also stablecoins that attempt stability through overcollateralization using other cryptocurrencies. Finally, there are algorithmic stablecoins that automatically adjust the cryptcurrency’s supply to keep its market price within certain parameters.

Stablecoins are however still cryptocurrency. Even if the stablecoin has a pegged 1 to 1 exchange ratio with the U.S. Dollar, it is not the same as cash. For tax and regulatory purposes, the IRS treats all cryptocurrency as intangible property subject to capital gains tax. They may be subject to separate state-level regulation as well.

Paying for goods and services in stablecoin is a taxable event because the IRS treats it like a sale or exchange of an asset, which is subject to capital gains tax. Technically, if the stablecoin is pegged to the dollar at a 1 to 1 ratio, the capital gain is 0 and there is no tax owed. But the transaction must still be recorded and reported, just like if you were buying and selling a stock at zero net gain/loss. Otherwise, you risk attracting an IRS audit to determine whether you underreprted taxable income. Buying stablecoin for cash and holding it is a non-taxable event.

Receiving stablecoin in exchange for goods and services is a taxable event. It is not much different than receiving payment in fiat currency, which is income subject to tax. The fair market value of the cryptocurrency as of the date of receipt determines its value for income reporting purposes. With stablecoin, it is easy to calculate because of the 1 to 1 ratio. Receiving 500 USDC is the equivalent of receiving $500 cash. However, spending the 500 USDC is not the same as spending $500 cash – rather, the transaction is considered a liquidation of property (subject to capital gains). Again, if the value of the stablecoin is pegged to the dollar, you are not going to have capital gains. But you must still keep records and record the transaction. If you are using a stablecoin that is pegged to an asset like gold, its price will fluctuate and you may record a capital gain or loss.

Converting other cryptocurrencies into stablecoin and vice-versa is also a taxable event. The sale of the crypto is an asset disposition that is subject to capital gains tax even if the transaction is an exchange of one currency to another. Similarly, using stablecoin to purchase other cryptocurrencies is a sale of the stablecoin that must be reported as income, even if the the capital gain is $0.

Stablecoins are still risky and unregulated. Not all stablecoins are created equal and it is a mistake to think that “stablecoin” means there is no risk involved. The LUNA/TERRA debacle is a good example because TERRA was supposedly a “stablecoin” pegged 1 to 1 to the U.S. dollar, yet it was pegged algorithmically (meaning artificially without any actual assets or fiat currencies backing it). An algorithm that no one really understands is not the same backing as fiat in a vault or money market securities or corporate bonds or commodities portfolios. The bottom line is that without a uniform definition of “stablecoin,” users should at a minimum know what “stabilizes” the value of the purported “stablecoin.”

There are other hurdles to using stablecoins in day-to-day business operations. As cryptocurrency, they are still subject to government regulation. For instance, it is illegal under federal labor law to pay workers in anything other than U.S. Dollars. On the international scene, China recently tightened anti-crypto regulations, prohibiting financial institutions from providing crypto exchange services, which presumably includes stablecoins. At the same time, China is rolling out its “digital yuan,” which is a sovereign-backed virtual currency. United States regulators have also expressed interest in the “digital dollar,” in part to improve financial services access to unbanked or underbanked communities. Additionally, all cryptocurrency transactions are still subject to exchange fees imposed by the intermediaries, and there may be delays or additional processing costs associated with converting stablecoin into fiat currency. Widespread adoption by merchants and the public is a must for stablecoins to develop practical utility – but right now, holding a wallet full of stablecoin is not the most practical or liquid solution for most businesses. Nor does a 1 to 1 dollar stablecoin provide any investment upside and in fact periodically loses value due to inflation.

Finally, there are at least 36 different stablecoins available for purchase via most popular exchanges. It is unknown which stablecoin (if any) will enjoy widespread adoption and popularity sufficient to result in real utility for businesses. Further, stablecoins are not truly decentralized because a central entity is holding the collateral, which in turn must be audited or otherwise verified. If a holding entity starts issuing stablecoins that are not actually collateralized, this would cause hyperinflation and essentially render the stablecoin worthless.

Stablecoin certainly holds a lot of promise for business use, but only solves the problem of volatility. Reduced volatility comes at a cost of a centralized authority and reintroduces trust into the cryptocurrency equation. At the same time, sovereign-issued digital currencies are on the horizon and may very well dispel the need for and demand for stablecoin.

Want to know more? Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
intellectual property internet law

NFTs: Investing in Virtual Real Estate and Other Digital Assets.

Disclaimer: This article is not investment advice, tax advice, or legal advice. It is for informational and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action (including investments) until you have consulted with a professional about your specific situation.

I have previously written about investing in cryptocurrencies through a self-directed retirement portfolio and about using them in day-to-day business transactions. There is no doubt that crypto and blockchain technology is here to stay. As evidence of this, the U.S. government will increase reporting of and tax enforcement for cryptocurrency transactions, which are currently treated like property for tax purposes, but not the same as stocks or securities. Increasing regulation and taxation certainly indicate how much the technology is being used and adopted across the world.

What about NFTs or non-fungible tokens? There was a lot of buzz in early 2021 about NFTs after Christie’s auctioned off a digital-only artwork for $69 million and suddenly everyone from Nike, to Hasbro, to Cervelo (a racing bike manufacturer) was selling digital-only versions of their collectibles or attaching NFTs to physical world assets. The hype has since subsided, at least from the mainstream media sources. However, spend enough time on the various social media platforms, and NFT proponents (sellers) will be quick to offer “virtual estates,” “one-of-kind avatars,” “priceless digital art,” and various other exotic and futuristic-sounding assets. Often, you will be directed to an auction site where you will have to place bids on the NFT, sometimes even using a native cryptocurrency or token like MANA or SAND.

Suppose you got caught up one night, cashed out your 401k, and bought $100,000 worth of NFTs – a virtual castle in Decentraland, some art tapestries to decorate, and a digital collection of Luka Doncic basketball cards. The next morning at breakfast you have to explain to your spouse – NFTs? WTF did you just buy? Read on.

  1. NFTs as personal or business investments.

Before investing in anything, it is generally a good idea to understand exactly what you are buying. NFTs are digital representations of unique items based on the Ethereum blockchain. When you buy an NFT, you basically just bought computer code. The simplest description of blockchain is that it is a decentralized public ledger or database. Data is entered into a block – in the case of an NFT, it is specific code that signifies the “object” and its owner – and then that data becomes part of the public ledger that is replicated and stored across a vast, decentralized computer network. An NFT can have a real world counterpart, but it does not have to. As will be discussed below, an NFT can be sold together with or separate from the work’s copyright. The “non-fungible” aspect of the token means it is unique and not interchangeable with other items. Traditional fiat currency is inherently fungible because a dollar bill is interchangeable with other dollar bills. Cryptocurrency is also fungible – one Bitcoin is the same as another and has the same value. On the other hand, an original Monet, your grandmother’s jewelry, or even a pair of Nike shoes are all non-fungible because they are unique.

One big difference between NFTs and cryptocurrency is liquidity. One of the reasons why crypto is so popular right now is accessibility. Exchanges like Coinbase make it easy for anyone to buy and sell cryptocurrency right from their phone, while keeping records, and facilitating exchange of almost any cryptocurrency. Whether you want to cash out into fiat dollars to cash out or exchange cryptocurrencies for other cryptocurrencies, you can do it on your phone or computer in a very simple and quick process. NFTs are not as liquid – to sell one you have to find a willing buyer and negotiate a price. For example, OpenSea is a large marketplace for NFTs, allowing listings at auction, fixed price, or declining price settings. The market determines the price of NFTs, meaning supply and demand. In the NFT market, there may be only a couple of willing buyer and sellers, which is quite different from the millions who buy and sell cryptocurrencies every day. Also, tthe Securities and Exchange Commission does not regulate NFTs or most cryptocurrencies at this time. While a company selling stock or bonds on the open market must follow filing and disclosure requirements to ensure a transparent public offering, crypto and NFTs offerors do not. Proceed with caution.

2. What are the legal implications of this “wild west” of NFTs?

NFT investors face two areas of legal issues: copyright law and tax law. Copyright law protects the creator’s rights in computer code, as well as art, music, and other creative works. Tax law is involved whenever you buy, sell, or invest in anything.

A. Copyright.

NFT ownership is not copyright ownership.

When buying or investing in an NFT, it is absolutely essential to understand what it is you are buying – in other word, what “bundle of rights” are you getting in exchange for your cash? In the physical world, when you buy an asset like a painting or a car, you are at least getting the physical thing. In the all-digital world of NFTs, it gets a little bit complex.

Under U.S. copyright law, the creator of art, music, movie, or other creative work owns the copyright, which attaches at the moment of creation. Transferring the physical object alone does not necessarily transfer the copyright with it – a written agreement transferring copyright is required to separate the creator from the copyright. In other words, the physical work and the copyright to that work are distinct and separate. NFTs are no different – the fact that the work is digital or consists of computer code does not matter. There is still the ownership of the original work (piece of code) and the copyright to that work. Do not assume that you are buying the copyright to the NFT when you purchase it on an online auction site unless there is a specific agreement to assign the copyright to the buyer.

If you bought an NFT without the copyright, you essentially bought a unique piece of computer code that you cannot display, duplicate, or republish without the original creator’s permission. You need the copyright to reproduce, copy, license, and otherwise do pretty much anything with the NFT. Creating derivative works based on the NFT likewise requires the copyright. In short, know what you are actually buying, as copyright gets particularly complex in the digital world. An attorney may be needed to review the agreements, especially if the transaction involves a substantial sum of money.

B. Tax.

The IRS issued guidance as far back as 2014 that cryptocurrency is taxed like property and subject to capital gains tax. But there has been no guidance on taxing NFTs. Because NFTs and cryptocurrency rely on the same underlying blockchain technology, it is likely that NFTs will also be taxed like property and subject to capital gains tax. That means if you buy an NFT for U.S. Dollars, you do not pay tax on that transaction (unless a state decides to enact a sales tax on digital assets). But when you sell that NFT in exchange for cash or cryptocurrency, or trade it for another NFT, you have a taxable event. Any “gain” will be treated as reportable taxable income.

It can get especially complex if you involve cryptocurrency in the transaction. Some NFTs can only be purchased in exchange for a specific token – for example, virtual real estate in Decentraland can be purchased only for MANA tokens, which are an Ethereum token. The price of the MANA token fluctuates, just like the price of BTC or ETH or DOGE. If you pay cash for MANA, that transaction is not taxable. But then when you exchange MANA for an NFT, you are “selling” the MANA, taking a capital gain or loss, and then acquiring the NFT at the market price, which establishes the NFT’s cost basis for future transactions. When you sell the NFT for cash, you have a capital gain based on the difference between the cost basis and the sale price. But if you trade the NFT for another NFT or for Bitcoin, you again have a double tax event because you are selling “property” (subject to capital gain at the time of exchange) and acquiring “property” (subject to capital gains at the time of subsequent sale or exchange) at the same time. This is why good record keeping is an absolute must and is especially critical if you are engaging in a large number of transactions.

All of this assumes that NFTs will be taxed like cryptocurrency. But it is possible that NFTs will be taxed differently based on what the NFT represents. Will the sale of digital land be treated as a sale of physical real estate? All of a sudden state transfer taxes may come into play. Will the sale of digital art or collectibles be treated the same as physical art of collectibles and subject to special tax rates? There are many unanswered questions at this time, but as the IRS zeroes in on crypto and blockchain assets as sources of tax revenue, there will certainly be regulation and litigation on this subject.

3. Future applications for NFTs beyond collectibles and investments.

One of the most fascinating things about NFTs and blockchain tech in general is unlimited potential. The decentralization and immutability aspects are extremely potent in a number of applications. For example, in the business setting, smart contracts that automatically enforce performance and payment can eliminate many costs and inefficiencies related to international trade. Escrow accounts and associated fees may very well be a thing of the past. If performance under a contract can be reduced to code and automated, costly contract disputes can be avoided.

Blockchain can also be used in software licenses as well as licenses for other intellectual property. Concert or other event tickets are another application. Corporate governance and shareholder meetings can be accomplished through blockchain – for example, a corporation could issue a token for each share and then ask its shareholders to vote by transferring the voting tokens to a specific address. The transparency and security of the blockchain are especially valuable in this context. Some commentators have even suggested blockchain as a way to secure and democratize political elections. With a publicly-verified chain, election fraud would virtually be eliminated and election results would become indisputable.

Whatever the future holds, blockchain is exciting technology. As with all emerging technologies, the law is an a state of flux. Government regulators are playing catch up to address the application of existing law to new tech and to propagate new laws to address emerging problems. If you are investing in NFTs or using blockchain in your business, contact an experienced attorney to answer your questions and ensure that you are being proactive with your regulatory and tax obligations.

Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law internet law

Ask the Crypto Tax Lawyer: Is Staking Income Taxable?

Yes, staking income – just like most other types of income – is taxable. However, the question is when? When you receive the staking reward? Or only when you sell or exchange the newly- obtained tokens? Under the first, more conservative approach, the token is actually taxed twice – once as ordinary income at the time of receipt and the second time at the capital gains tax rate when it is sold or exchanged. Under the second, more aggressive approach, the token is not taxed upon receipt and not subject to tax until it is sold or exchanged. The second approach also allows token holders to take advantage of more favorable long-term capital gains tax rates by holding the staking rewards longer than a year.

How is Staking Different From Interest?

What is staking? It is an arrangement to “lock up” or “stake” a portion of an owner’s crypto tokens in a staking pool in return for additional cryptocurrency over time. The return is often expressed as a percentage. This makes staking seem very similar to an interest rate paid on a certificate of deposit or savings account. Indeed, on Coinbase, staking rewards are expressed in terms of an APY (annual percentage yield) and the term “interest earned” is used synonymously with staking. Unlike proof-of-work mining, which validates new transactions through solving complex algorithms, staking is more energy efficient and environmentally-friendly. Staking allows network participants to nominate their coins to be used as validators and to guarantee the legitimacy of new transactions on the blockchain. In return for validating a new block, the owner receives new tokens; if the transactions validated are later found to be illegitimate, the validator may lose tokens through a process called “slashing.”

Although it may seem like interest income, staking income may not be taxed the same way. The IRS has not taken a definitive position on this question even as the deadline to file 2021 taxes approaches. One of the reasons may be because of pending litigation in Jarrett v. IRS. In 2019, Josh and Jessica Jarrett sued the IRS for a refund on taxes paid on staking income, arguing that cryptocurrency received for staking should not be. Recently, the IRS appeared to concede that staking income is not taxable at inception and agreed to issue the Jarretts a refund. However, the taxpayers rejected the IRS’s offer – instead, opting to push the Tax Court to make a definitive ruling on the issue and create binding precedent. In response, the IRS has asked the Tax Court to dismiss the case in light of the plaintiffs having obtained full relief and the absence of a “case or controversy” for the Tax Court to decide.

The Conservative Approach – Staking Rewards Are Taxed Twice

Intuitively, it may seem that income from staking should be treated the same as interest/dividend income from a savings account, which is incurred when the bank pays it out. In the crypto context, the IRS has taken a position since 2014 that with mining, the fair market value of the virtual currency as of the date of receipt is includible in gross income. Arguably, staking income is sufficiently similar to interest earned or mining to be treated the same. Depending on the terms of the staking arrangement or agreement, the cryptocurrency or token contributed is restricted much in the same way that cash in a certificate of deposit is locked in until maturity.

The Aggressive Approach – Staking Rewards Are Only Taxed When Sold or Exchanged

However, the counter-argument (and the taxpayer’s position in the Jarrett case) is that the tokens received as a staking reward have no value until they are sold or exchanged. In that sense, they are like manufactured product that may have value when created, but is not taxed until it is sold. The product has a market value when created, but the IRS does not impose a tax on it at the time of creation.

Further, fiat currency has tangible value when received – an interest payment of $25 has worth and buying power at the time of receipt. It does not need to be sold or exchanged to have value. Conversely, 100 Tezos tokens (at issue in the Jarrett case) have no buying power or value until and unless they are exchanged into fiat, traded for another currency, or used to pay for services. Yes, if you pay for services with cryptocurrency, you are taxed on any difference between the basis and the fair market value of services received. According to the IRS, if you buy 100 Tezos for $1 (a basis of $100) and then exchange those same 100 Tezos for $300 worth of legal services, you just realized a $200 taxable gain. Proponents of the more aggressive Jarrett approach argue that cryptocurrency or tokens received as staking rewards are more analogous to a manufactured product than fiat currency interest or dividends.

The Issue Remains Unsettled

To complicate the issue further, the IRS’s offer to refund the Jarretts’ tax and settle the litigation seems like a tacit endorsement of the second, more aggressive approach. Arguably, the IRS is conceding the issue and admitting staking income is only subject to income tax when sold or exchanged. However, this position is directly at odds with the IRS’s guidance on tokens received from mining. The IRS’s Notice 2014-21 on virtual currency taxation states that “when a taxpayer successfully “mines” virtual currency, the fair market value of the virtual currency as of the date of receipt is includible in gross income.”

While the issue remains unresolved, taxpayers should consult with their legal and financial advisors on the correct approach for them. The conservative approach risks including too much in your gross income. The aggressive approach risks underpayment penalties in the future if the IRS does issue guidance and takes the same position on staking as it has on mining. But in any case, keep an eye on the Jarrett case, as the Tax Court may rule on this very question in the near future.


Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2022 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law gaming law intellectual property internet law trademarks

Do I need a Metaverse Trademark?

Luxury goods company Gucci recently bought a plot of LAND in the Sandbox Game, an Ethereum-based play-to-earn game. This LAND is a virtual real estate plot (in the form of an NFT or non-fungible token) where Gucci plans to sell in-game clothing and collectibles. As futuristic as this seems, Gucci is not the only major company looking to get into the Web3.0 space. Walmart, McDonalds, Panera, Victoria’s Secret, Nike, and L’Oréal are just a few of the big players that recently filed trademarks specifically to protect their intellectual property in the Metaverse.

Nike has become particularly active. The company created a Nikeland experience in the popular Roblox game world (along with companies like Vans, Chipotle, and Hyundai, which also have staked out territory on Roblox). Nike also recently acquired RTFKT, a studio that specializes in NFT development and in January 2022, Nike announced the formation of Nike Digital Studios to create and deliver Metaverse and blockchain-based user experiences. Additionally, Nike has filed for dozens of trademarks to protect its virtual brand, including the use of its name and logo in online art, virtual goods, video games, and avatars. With a multi-billion dollar company like Nike trademarking dozens of its NFTs, many game developers, NFT collectors, traders, crypto bros, and others wonder whether they, too, should file for trademark protection within the Metaverse for their brand.

Do Gaming Developers Need Trademark Protection?

Absolutely. Games, gaming, and software in general are highly-competitive industries. Unfortunately, there is not much stopping a third party from copying your design and profiting off of it. This can create – not only marketplace confusion – but irreparable damage and dilution of your valuable brand. This can happen to companies big and small. Additionally, if you fail to trademark your game, brand, logo, catchphrase, etc., your competitor can come in, copy your brand, and then accuse you of violating their rights. While it is possible to file for retroactive trademark protection and win eventually, the easiest (and cheapest) protection is filing a trademark right away.

Do I Need to Trademark my NFT?

Yes. It is essential for you to trademark your NFT in order to protect it from copycats. The United States is a first-to-use country, which means your NFT will already have some automatic protections after minting. However, it would be very tough protecting your unregistered “common law” trademark in the worldwide NFT marketplace. Additionally, it would be very difficult to defend an unregistered NFT trademark in any sort of legal dispute should a third party copy your idea. Filing a trademark with the USPTO ensures validity and protection within all fifty states.

Trademarking your NFT creates a brand identity that is uniquely yours. Trademarking a unique slogan, logo, or design can be a valuable marketing tool for you going forward and add tremendous value to your project. After all, intellectual property rights are what you actually own when it comes to non-physical property like NFTs (and software or computer code in general).

Copyright is another important intellectual property right for NFT owners, users, buyers, and sellers. For example, it is critical to ask what rights you are actually buying when purchasing an NFT? Is there an agreement to transfer the copyright? A license? Nothing at all? Lack of clarity in the NFT transfer process can and will lead to litigation, more so as NFTs become more and more widespread.

How Do I Protect my NFT Internationally?

You can protect your NFT internationally, provided that you also apply for international registration during your initial trademark filing. Under the Madrid Protocol (which is an international treaty for the uniform protection and registration of trademarks), a registration through the USPTO can also be registered in other countries with a single application.

What is a benefit of international registration? International registration allows you to use a foreign country’s laws and judicial resources to enforce your mark in that country. A USPTO registration still allows enforcement through a U.S. based court, even if the infringer is in a foreign country. However, even if you prevail, you might not be able to enforce the U.S. court’s judgment abroad. An international trademark registration opens up a number of other enforcement options. If you are interested in international trademark registration, this is something to discuss at your initial consultation.

What Types of Things Should I Trademark?

Here is a non-exhaustive list of items that could potentially qualify for trademark protection:

  • Avatars
  • Logos
  • Game Name or Gaming Development Company’s Name
  • NFTs
  • Virtual Goods (avatar skins, digital art, etc.)
  • Color Schemes
  • Particular Sounds (The coin grab ding from the classic Mario Brothers game comes to mind here.)
  • Slogans

What Cannot be Trademarked?

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has a set of guidelines that lists some of the following reasons for trademark rejection:

  • Likelihood of Confusion – If you create a game called GranD Turismo 7, you could not trademark that name because people could confuse it with Gran Turismo 7, the newest addition to PlayStation’s highest selling video game franchise. Sony owns the trademark to protect against competitors who seek to profit off of its name recognition by creating a similarly named game. Thus, you cannot trademark GranD Turismo 7.
  • Merely Descriptive and/or Intentionally Misleading – For example, you can’t trademark the words “fun and entertaining.” Even though your game is both fun and entertaining, these only describe the game itself and don’t necessarily make your game unique, so you can’t trademark them. Likewise, the USPTO will reject your trademark if it is intentionally misleading. For example, if your game’s name is “Play with Cryptocurrency,” but the game does not play with cryptocurrency, the USPTO reviewer could consider this game name intentionally misleading and deny your trademark.
  • Primarily a Surname – For example, Smith’s Play-to-Earn Game is primarily a last name (and merely descriptive) would not be suitable for a trademark.

How do I file a trademark for my game or NFT?

Whether you’re filing a trademark for an NFT, a digital avatar, a slogan, or your business name, Artaev at Law has the professional expertise to help you do it right. Artaev at Law, together with the specialized trademark attorneys at Mighty Marks, now offers a fixed fee, all-inclusive trademark service. Contact Dan Artaev at dan@artaevatlaw.com for additional information.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional. Any link to or reference to any specific project is not an endorsement of or validation of that project and is for solely informational purposes.

Categories
business law internet law

Stablecoin Taxation and Securities Regulation: What Every Investor Must Know.

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies backed by other assets like fiat currency reserves, precious metals, commercial paper, and even portfolios made up of other cryptocurrencies. By pegging their value to another asset, stablecoins attempt to decrease price volatility and achieve a more “stable” price than uncollateralized cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. As I previously wrote, stablecoins may be particularly useful for international trade and business due to their predictable value and the ability to avoid wire delays and to minimize transaction costs. Stablecoins are also not targets of speculation or artificial price increases due to external events like Elon Musk’s SNL appearances or even China’s clampdown on Bitcoin mining. If the stablecoin is pegged to the value of the dollar, it will still be worth $1 regardless of whether there is a sudden spike in demand or supply.

Other than potential business use, stablecoins are also a popular investment medium. Certain exchanges have offered attractive interest rates on stablecoin holdings, ranging from Coinbase offering 4% on USD Coin (USDC) to double-digit returns on some lesser exchanges and stablecoins. As always, do your due diligence and make sure you know where your money is going before transferring any significant amount of cash. Also, it may be worthwhile to test the liquidity or withdrawal time with smaller deposits before investing any large amounts.

Just like with traditional cryptocurrency, there are two main legal areas that affect stablecoins: tax and securities regulation. Here are the latest “must knows” in each area:

Stablecoins are taxed like property and are subject to capital gains tax. Cryptocurrency is not “currency” as far as the IRS is concerned – rather, for taxation purposes, it is treated like property and subject to capital gains tax. This gets tricky, especially with stablecoins that are pegged 1:1 to the dollar. Buying stablecoins (or any crypto) for dollars is not a taxable event. However, using stablecoins to purchase goods and services is a taxable event that must be reported, even if your capital gains are zero.

For instance, if you buy 1,000 USDC for $1,000, that is not taxable. Then, when you pay a Romanian engineer 1,000 USDC in exchange for a circuit board design, the IRS deems that you have sold the USDC at the market rate in exchange for the engineering services. The difference between your cost basis and your sell price is the capital gain. Where the stablecoin is pegged 1:1 to the dollar, the capital gain will be $0 (your purchase price and sale price are the same). In fact, you may even realize a loss that you can use to offset your income if you paid a transaction fee. Transaction fees are added to your cost basis, so if you paid a $10 transaction fee to buy 1,000 USDC, your cost basis is $1,010 and when you sell for $1,000, you just netted a $10 loss. Also, you can end up with capital gains or losses if you are transacting large amounts of stablecoin – for example if you sell 50,000 USDT (Tether) when it’s price fluctuated slightly to $1.01, you just received a $500 capital gain.

Additionally, if you are earning interest on your USDT holdings, interest is taxable like ordinary income. In other words, buying stablecoin for fiat currency is not taxable, but earning stablecoin through staking is taxable. Just like you pay income tax on interest earned from your savings account, you will incur income tax on cryptocurrency gains. Finally, when you use your earned USDT to buy something or convert to cash or another cryptocurrency, that is a reportable taxable event subject to capital gains tax because for IRS purposes, you just sold property – your cryptocurrency.

Some stablecoins may be regulated like securities. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforces U.S. securities laws, which apply to a wide range of publicly-available investment products like stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and investment contracts where investors provide capital in exchange for expected returns. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are not considered securities because they are exchange mediums and in the SEC’s view, are no different than a foreign currency like the Euro or the Japanese Yen. At the same time, the SEC has scrutinized new coin offerings (also called initial coin offerings or ICOs) and concluded that they may constitute investment contracts if there are facts that indicate the buyer is “expecting a profit to be derived from the efforts of others.” See generally SEC v W.J. Howey Co., 328 US 293 (1946) (where the Supreme Court held that shares in a citrus grove operation were investment contracts subject to securities laws because the investors provided capital with the expectation that workers’ efforts in harvesting oranges would yield profits). Certain stablecoins, especially those that seek capitalization through ICOs and promise a percentage return through “staking,” will be considered “investment contracts” required to register with the SEC and provide public information like any other security.

There are also some stablecoins that are backed by securities like corporate and municipal bonds, mutual funds, and other publicly-traded instruments that are themselves regulated by the SEC. There is little doubt that these security-backed stablecoins are considered derivatives because their value is derived from the value of regulated securities. SEC regulation will require stablecoin issuers to disclose additional information about their companies to the public. Already there is some concerning information release ahead of Circle’s (the issuer of USDC) intent to go public – USDC reserves are only61% cash and money market funds, with the rest divided between U.S. and foreign treasury bonds, municipal, and corporate debt. Previously, the 1:1 stablecoin issuers represented that each coin was backed by actual cash reserves, which were regularly audited. Apparently, that is not the precise reality.

Finally, stablecoins are also facing increased regulatory scrutiny from central bank authorities. Federal Reserve officials have expressed their concerns about the effect of stablecoins on the credit markets. Stablecoins also threaten the ability of the Federal Reserve to regulate monetary supply to stimulate the economy and control inflation. For instance, if a coin like USDC gains widespread adoption, a private company like Circle will be able to regulate monetary supply by increasing and decreasing interest rates. Expect to see increased guidance and regulation from the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve in the near future. It would not be surprising to see stablecoin issuers to be treated as banks in certain circumstances.

Want to know more? Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
business law internet law

Ask the Crypto Tax Lawyer: How Can I Reduce My Crypto Taxes?

Important: The information in this article applies to individual investors and LLCs that are taxed as pass-through entities. The rules are different for corporations and LLCs electing to be taxed as a corporation and are not addressed here. This article is for informational and promotional purposes only and, as always, you should consult with a professional about your specific tax situation before taking any action.

Despite its name, cryptocurrency or “crypto” is not really currency. For tax purposes, it is treated as “property,” which means it is taxed similar to stocks and bonds. As I previously wrote, buying and selling crypto is subject to capital gains tax. Paying for goods and services with crypto is likewise subject to capital gains tax. Exchanging one crypto asset for another is a taxable event as well.

“Crypto tax” has a nice ring to it, but it is nothing more than the application of ordinary capital gains tax to cryptocurrency transactions. The most important aspect of crypto investing – whether individually or as part of a business – is good record keeping. Exchange platforms like Coinbase can generate basic reports to use at tax time. But remember that you must also keep records when you pay for goods and services with crypto or receive payments in crypto. For tax purposes, when you pay someone in Bitcoin or Ethereum, the IRS considers that you have sold the cryptocurrency for cash (and realized a capital gain or loss). When you receive crypto as payment for goods and services, you acquired ordinary income in the amount equal to the market value of the crypto at the time of the transaction. In short, keep good records, you will need them.

What are some top strategies to minimize capital gains tax from cryptocurrency investing? As with any other investment, a little bit of planning can help you minimize your tax bill at the end of the year.

  1. HODL. The capital gains tax rate is different for short-term and long-term gains. Purchasing and selling crypto within a 365 day period is considered the short term, and any gains during that period are taxed like ordinary income (i.e. wages). Short-term crypto income will be taxed between 10% and 37%, depending on your tax bracket. On the other hand, selling crypto more than a year after buying it lets you take advantage of the lower long-term capital gains rate. Depending on your income level, long-term capital gains are taxed at either 0%, 15%, or 20%, with most people falling into the middle 15% bracket. For example, if you are paying a 22% rate on ordinary income, but are in the 15% bracket for long-term gains, you will end up with significant savings on your tax bill.
  2. Offset. Of course, not everyone buys crypto for long term investing. If you are trying to time the market and profit from crypto’s volatility, holding to gain favorable capital gains treatment may not be a feasible strategy. Tax law generally allows offsetting capital gains with losses, but the strategy does have limitations. Losses must first be used to offset gains of the same kind – for instance, short-term losses must be used to offset short-term gains, and only if you have excess short-term losses can you shift them over to reduce your long-term capital gains. If you still have remaining losses, you can take an ordinary income deduction of up to $3,000 for the tax year and retain the balance to offset next year’s gains and income.
  3. Decrease Taxable Income. Like with other “property,” you can time your sales to your specific income situation. You may want to sell appreciated crypto when you have less income than you anticipate in the future. Or, you may accelerate 401k/IRA contributions to take advantage of the up-front tax break. Health Savings Account contributions are another taxable income reduction alternative, especially if you are anticipating significant health care expenditures in the near future. For businesses, business expenses can be used to reduce taxable income, but be sure that the expense is both “ordinary” and “necessary.” For example, renting a building and paying electricity costs for your Bitcoin farm are probably ordinary and necessary expenses. Also, be careful to properly categorize any business start-up costs, assets, and improvements, which are treated as capital expenses (and therefore are different than your ordinary business expenses).
  4. Set up a self-directed IRA. Self-directed IRAs or SDIRAs are little-known but powerful investment tools for the sophisticated investor. They allow you to take full control of your retirement investments and direct the funds into non-traditional assets. Commonly used for holding real estate, private company stock, and precious metals, SDIRAs can certainly be used to buy and hold crypto. Most bank-managed retirement plans can be converted to the self-directed kind, but there are additional fees and special rules about what your SDIRA can and cannot do to retain the tax-favored treatment by the IRS. In essence, the SDIRA can be used to convert all or part of your retirement portfolio into an investment “checkbook” that you can then use to purchase and hold assets like crypto for the benefit of your retirement.
  5. Move, gift, donate, or leave it to your heirs. Depending on your situation, there are other options that may be used to optimize your tax situation. If you are in a state that imposes its own income tax, you may want to consider moving to a no income tax jurisdiction. Or potentially incorporating and locating your Bitcoin mining company there. Likewise, depending on your future goals, retirement situation, and estate planning, it may be advantageous to shift some of your crypto holdings (especially those where you are looking at a significant gain) towards those objectives. For example, if you leave your crypto portfolio as part of your estate, heirs would receive a “step up” in basis and receive the crypto at the fair market value at the time of death. This significantly reduces their tax bill and something to consider if a crypto portfolio is part of your estate planning.

There are other strategies that may be available based on your particular situation. Remember to keep good records, plan ahead, and get a professional to answer all your crypto tax questions.

Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Exit mobile version