Carriers Archives - ARTAEV AT LAW PLLC

Are False Online Reviews of Trucking Companies Protected by the First Amendment?

One Crucial Distinction: Fact vs. Opinion

One key distinction lies between statements of fact and statements of opinion. While opinions are generally protected, even if they are negative, false statements of fact are not. For example, saying “I didn’t like their service” is an opinion. Saying “They were two hours late for the delivery” is a statement of fact (that can be proven or disproven with objective evidence, like GPS records).

Defamation and the First Amendment

Business defamation occurs when someone makes a false statement of fact that harms the reputation of a company. To prove defamation, a trucking company generally must show:

Falsity: The statement made was demonstrably false.

Identification: The statement clearly identified the trucking company.

Publication: The statement was communicated to a third party (e.g., posted online).

Damages: The false statement caused harm to the company’s reputation or business. Actual money damages are always helpful (such as documented loss of loads), but most states also recognize the intangible value of business reputation.

Fault: The person making the statement knew it was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

False Reviews: Not Protected Speech

False reviews that make objectively untrue claims about a trucking company’s performance, safety record, or business practices can constitute defamation. These statements are not protected by the First Amendment simply because they are published online. If a review makes a factual assertion that can be proven true or false with evidence (e.g., “The company’s trucks are unsafe” or “They consistently fail to deliver on time”), and that assertion is false, it can form the basis of a defamation claim.

Over 100 years ago, in Schenk v. United States, Justice Holmes explained the limit of the First Amendment: “[t]he most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.” In other words, the First Amendment does not protect speech that is deliberately false and harmful to others. Whether shouting “fire” in a theater in the early 20th century or falsely accusing someone of “double brokering” in 2025, the outcome is the same.

Additionally, some savvy posters (or their lawyers) raise the stakes by referencing something called anti-SLAPP laws when confronted about their false review. State anti-SLAPP laws allow a court to dismiss a defamation case when it is brought for an improper purpose (such as extortion or to suppress speech). A court can also impose sanctions. However, anti-SLAPP does not apply to factually supported, valid business defamation cases that become necessary to protect a business’s reputation.

What Can Trucking Companies Do?

If your trucking company is the target of false online reviews, it’s essential to take action. Here are some steps you can consider:

Document Everything: Keep records of the false reviews, including screenshots and timestamps. Gather all of the related documents, such as driver records, proofs of delivery, and bills of lading. This is especially critical if you end up in litigation.

Contact the Posting Individual or Entity: Reach out to the posting broker or other individual and attempt to secure a removal of the review through an informal business negotiation.

Contact a reputation management specialist: Our law firm has partnered with Carrier Defender to support an informal, expedited dispute resolution process for carriers facing false reviews. The Carrier Defender process is administered by experienced industry professionals and backstopped by our legal expertise.

Consult with an Attorney: If all else fails, an experienced attorney can help you assess your legal options and take appropriate action to protect your company’s reputation. This might involve sending a formal demand letter to the person who posted the review or, in some cases, filing a lawsuit for defamation. However, be mindful of the fact that litigation is slow, expensive, and no outcome can be guaranteed. Also, note that due to law licensing restrictions, you should contact an attorney licensed in state where the posting broker is located or where your own company is based.

Have more questions? Contact our firm by email or call us today.

Blackmail, Civil Extortion, and Economic Duress in the Trucking Industry: Legal Remedies for Unlawful Threats

In the highly competitive and fast-paced trucking industry, maintaining a solid reputation is crucial. Brokers and trucking companies alike rely heavily on positive reviews and industry reputation to secure business and ensure steady operations. Previously, I have written about when such negative reviews rise to the levels of defamation and potential legal remedies available to protect a business’s good will.

Unfortunately, some unscrupulous persons or companies may exploit this vulnerability by threatening to post false negative reviews online to coerce carriers into unfair agreements or payments. Some carriers even report being openly extorted – with brokers demanding cash payments in exchange for removing a false FreightGuard report. At Artaev at Law PLLC, we understand the devastating impact such threats can have on your business and we stand by to help protect your company’s rights. This article explores the legal remedies available, including the differences between blackmail, civil extortion, and economic duress.

Blackmail

Blackmail, also known as extortion in certain contexts, is a crime both under state and federal law. The federal Hobbs Act prohibits extortion affecting interstate or foreign commerce – a designation especially applicable in the cross-border trucking industry.

The crime involves coercing someone to take action or refrain from action by threatening to reveal damaging or incriminating information. In the trucking industry, a broker may threaten to post false negative reviews unless a trucking company complies with unreasonable demands.

Key Elements of Blackmail:

Threat: The broker makes a threat to post false negative reviews.
Demand: The broker demands money, services, or other benefits from the trucking company.
Intent: The broker’s intent is to coerce the trucking company into compliance.

While blackmail is primarily addressed under criminal statutes, it may also intersect with civil remedies, particularly when economic harm is involved.

Legal Recourse:

If you suspect you are a victim of blackmail or extortion, you should consider filing a police report with your local police department. Your state attorney general’s office may also have resources and direct you to the appropriate agency to lodge your complaint. Be ready to provide evidence of your claims, including any correspondence such as emails or text messages that show the illegal conduct.

Civil Extortion

Civil extortion is a tort that provides a legal remedy for victims of coercive threats used to obtain money, property, or other benefits. In the context of the trucking industry, a broker’s threat to post false negative reviews to extract financial or other concessions from a trucking company can be actionable as civil extortion.

Key Elements of Civil Extortion:

Threat or Coercion: The broker threatens to post false negative reviews.
Intent to Obtain Benefits: The broker aims to obtain money, services, or other benefits through the threat.
Lack of Consent: The trucking company complies with the broker’s demands due to the threat.
Damages: The trucking company suffers actual harm, such as financial losses or damage to reputation from compliance with the illegal demand.

Legal Recourse:

Victims of civil extortion can file a lawsuit seeking compensatory damages for financial losses and emotional distress, punitive damages to punish the broker’s egregious conduct, and injunctive relief to prevent further threats or actions. Evidence showing the threat – like emails or text messages – are critical in the civil context as well. Additionally, actual damages from compliance must be shown – a mere threat of harm is not sufficient to sustain a civil action for extortion.

Economic Duress

Economic duress occurs when one party uses wrongful threats or pressure to force another party into a contractual agreement. In the trucking industry, a broker’s threat to post false negative reviews to coerce a trucking company into accepting unfavorable contract terms can constitute economic duress. For example, if broker threatens to “FreightGuard” a carrier unless the carrier agrees to a rate reduction, additional routing, or other costly or unfavorable modifications, economic duress may have occurred.

A party seeking to void a contract may affirmatively claim economic duress, but it is more likely to show up as a defense. Where a party seeks to enforce a contract with terms obtained by duress, the defending party can assert economic duress as an affirmative defense.

Key Elements of Economic Duress:

Wrongful Threat: The broker threatens to post false negative reviews.
Lack of Reasonable Alternatives: The trucking company has no reasonable alternative but to comply with the broker’s demands.
Induced Agreement: The threat induces the trucking company to enter into a contract or agreement.
Resulting Harm: The trucking company suffers harm as a result of the coerced agreement.

Legal Recourse:

Trucking companies can seek to void contracts entered into under economic duress, as these agreements are not considered the result of free and voluntary consent. Additionally, they may pursue damages for any financial losses incurred due to the coerced agreement.

Conclusion

Threats to post false negative reviews can severely impact a trucking company’s reputation and business operations. Understanding the legal remedies available—blackmail, civil extortion, and economic duress—empowers trucking companies to take action against unscrupulous brokers. At Artaev at Law PLLC, we are committed to protecting your business interests and ensuring that you are not victimized by unlawful threats. If you find yourself facing such a situation, we are here to help you navigate the legal landscape and protect your rights.

Have more questions? Contact our firm by email or call us today to set up your free initial consultation.