Author: Artaev at Law

Dan Artaev is an expert attorney, specializing in business law issues that affect modern high-tech businesses. Dan’s international background, as well as 10+ years of experience in private business litigation, contract law, and as a government labor lawyer are especially valuable to his clients. Dan is also a proud husband, dad, and cat owner with many hobbies, including triathlon training.

e-mail: dan@artaevatlaw.com

Ask the Crypto Tax Lawyer: What’s New for ’22?

2022 is a marquee year for anyone who took got involved in cryptocurrency during the 2021 market boom. The start of the new year means the start of tax preparation season and many individuals and companies are working to understand the tax treatment and implications of digital asset investments. In 2021, the IRS and the Department of Treasury announced increased efforts to track cryptocurrency transactions and enforce the perceived underpayment of tax in the crypto world. However, the government’s guidance has been limited. There are many uncertainties and questions in this evolving area of law. Read on for a summary of the key issues:

Cryptocurrencies Are Taxed As Property Subject to the Capital Gains Tax.

In the ever-changing world of crypto, one thing has stayed the same (since at least 2014): Cryptocurrency is property subject to the capital gains tax. In its FAQ guidelines, the IRS addresses a number of situations (such a hard forks and airdrops) to explain its position on basis and gain/loss calculation. If you received, sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of “any financial interest in any virtual currency,” the IRS requires you to disclose this on the first page of the 1040. If you check “yes,” expect to file a 1040 Schedule D (“Capital Gains and Losses”) and an 8949 supplement.

What does this mean in practice?

  • If you bought cryptocurrency in 2021 for cash and are holding it (or HODLING), there is no transaction subject to capital gains and nothing to report.
  • If you sold cryptocurrency for cash, traded crypto for another crypto, used crypto to buy an NFT, or paid someone for goods or services using crypto, you have a reportable capital gains transaction. The “gain” is the difference between the initial value (basis) and the sale value. If the period between acquisition and sale is less than a year, the short-term rate applies, which treats the gain as ordinary income. If the period is more than a year, the long-term rate applies and is either 0%, 15%, or 20% depending on your annual income level.
  • Exchanging crypto for other crypto (for example, you exchange BTC for ETH) is also subject to capital gains tax. The IRS treats the exchange as if you sold BTC for cash and used that cash to buy ETH. That means that any “gain” you realize on the sale of BTC is reportable and taxable, even if you use 100% of your proceeds to buy another cryptocurrency.
  • If you use crypto to buy an NFT or pay for some other goods or services, the IRS treats the transaction as if you sold the crypto for cash (incurring a capital gain) and then used the cash to buy the NFT or pay for the other goods/services.
  • What if my corporation or LLCs bought, sold, or exchanged virtual currency or digital assets? There is no guidance to suggest that business entities are treated any different. Record and report crypto and other digital asset transactions like you would physical property or assets.
  • Best practice remains to record all of your cryptocurrency transactions in a spreadsheet or accounting software, including the type of asset, the basis price, the date, and any gain/loss (as well as transaction fees). Alternatively, bigger exchanges like Coinbase make reports available to their customers and integrate with several popular crypto tax reporting platforms.

The IRS Has Not Issued Guidance on Taxing NFTs, Utility Tokens, Security Tokens, or Any Other Types of Digital Assets.

What about NFTs? Or utility tokens that you may have bought and sold as part of a play-to-earn game? Or security tokens (STOs) that becoming a corporate financing alternative for high-tech startups? The IRS has not issued guidance or taken a position on any of these particular instruments. In its FAQ, the IRS defines “virtual currency” as follows:

 Virtual currency is a digital representation of value, other than a representation of the U.S. dollar or a foreign currency (“real currency”), that functions as a unit of account, a store of value, and a medium of exchange.  Some virtual currencies are convertible, which means that they have an equivalent value in real currency or act as a substitute for real currency.  The IRS uses the term “virtual currency” in these FAQs to describe the various types of convertible virtual currency that are used as a medium of exchange, such as digital currency and cryptocurrency.   Regardless of the label applied, if a particular asset has the characteristics of virtual currency, it will be treated as virtual currency for Federal income tax purposes. 

https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/frequently-asked-questions-on-virtual-currency-transactions

Although this definition gives some guidance on the IRS’s position, it is still not clear whether NFTs and non-cryptocurrency tokens are “virtual currency.” For instance, NFTs (non-fungible tokens), represent a wide range of things. They can be art or basketball trading cards, but also can be virtual metaverse real estate or video game magical items. Some commentators have suggested that NFTs will be taxed at the 28% “collectibles” tax rate – but that hypothesis presupposes that all NFTs are “collectibles,” which is simply not true for all NFTs. At the same time, the IRS’s definition of “virtual currency” appears to require the asset to be used as a “medium of exchange,” which is also not true of all NFTs. At this time, the NFT tax analysis is best done on a case-by-case basis, with a careful evaluation of what the NFT represents and how the real-world equivalent would be taxed.

Utility tokens are digital tokens that have non-investment uses (or utility) and fall outside of the federal definition of “security.” Play-to-earn video games (like Axie Infinity and its imitators) use native digital tokens for in-game currency and rewards, but the tokens can also be bought and sold on a secondary market. These tokens are more in line with the IRS’s “virtual currency” definition – and while the IRS has not expressly opined that utility tokens are property subject to capital gains tax, they most likely are. In other words, keep records and be prepared to report your sales and exchanges at tax time.

Security tokens (security token offerings are called STOs) are the digital equivalent of traditional corporate financing instruments like SAFE notes or seed round equity. However, the IRS does not consider STOs (or any other tokens) as stock or securities, even if the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) does. In other words, you sell or buy a security token, you must do so either as a registered security or one that meets an exemption (for example under Regulation A+, D, or S). However, neither the investor nor the selling company gets to claim any sort of tax benefit from the “security” token – because the IRS likely treats it as property and not securities. This means that when you invest in a security token (even one that is registered with the IRS), the tax breaks or advantages that apply to the purchase and sale of stock do not apply.

The Wash Sale Rule Still Does Not Apply to Cryptocurrency, But Might Apply Next Year.

There is a silver lining to the fact that cryptocurrency (or other tokens) are not considered “securities” for the purposes of tax law. The wash sale rule does not apply to crypto and allows for loss harvesting to offset capital gains (and even up to $3,000 of ordinary income.) For example, right now crypto markets are down from their highs and many investors may be showing a loss. If you sell at a loss and buy the asset back immediately, you can claim the “loss” on the sale on your taxes. The wash sale rule – which is applicable to securities – requires a 30 days period before repurchasing the same or substantially the same security.

Congress is aware of and is working on closing this so-called “loophole,” but right now the wash sale rule likely does not apply. It is unclear whether you will be able to claim a loss on 2022 returns if you sell at a loss in 2022, but as of the date of this article, crypto investors can still take advantage of loss harvesting opportunities.

The 2021 Infrastructure Bill Has Not Killed Cryptocurrency.

In the summer and fall of 2021, there was a lot of concern in the cryptocurrency community over certain reporting requirements that Congress wanted to impose on cryptocurrency market participants. Although much of the “hype” was overblown, the main issues were with the new reporting requirements, the definition of “broker,” and how the reporting requirements would affect miners and other participants who are not in the direct sales business.

President Biden signed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act on November 15, 2021, and needless to say, the U.S. cryptocurrency markets are very much alive and functioning. The Act extended the $10,000 cash reporting requirements to “digital assets” transactions, meaning that businesses that receive more than $10,000 in cryptocurrency have to file a Form 8300 with the IRS. The form requires the disclosure of the payor and payee’s name, address, Tax ID, and other information.

The new reporting requirement will not take effect until 2024. By then, expect the IRS and the Treasury Department to develop regulations and provide guidance to market participants, so stay tuned for future developments in this area. It is likely that the scope of the regulations will be limited, as $10,000+ crypto and NFT transactions are much more common than cash transactions, and (unlike cash) also may take place without the parties ever even seeing each other or meeting.

Additional regulation of digital assets in the U.S. is to be expected given their popularity and increasingly prominent role in the economy. However, the U.S. is not about to “outlaw” cryptocurrency, NFTs, token, or any other digital assets. The blockchain tech market is alive and well, but with better defined taxation and regulation may even become more mainstream.

The bottom line is that cryptocurrency markets and derivative digital assets are here to stay. Regulation is constantly evolving and there are many uncertainties for investors and companies working in this emerging market in 2022. Professional legal guidance is always a good idea.

Want to know more? Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2022 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

What is a Security Token Offering (STO) and How Do I Use It In My Business?

Photo by Alesia Kozik on Pexels.com

A security token offering (or STO) is a 21st century blockchain-based alternative to a traditional equity or debt sale to raise company funds. Instead of selling units or shares, a company sells digital tokens to investors. Instead of selling SAFE (simple agreement for future equity) notes, companies can offer a SAFT (simple agreement for future tokens).

But why would a company want to sell tokens in the first place? STOs and traditional equity offerings fall within securities laws and must either be registered with the SEC or comply with exemptions (Regulation A+, D, or S for example). State-level “blue sky” laws may also apply. Also, like traditional securities, STOs represent fractional ownership in a tangible asset, either an equity interest in the company, a profit share, or debt instrument.

An STO does have certain benefits over selling traditional securities:

  • Unlike traditional securities, the STO eliminates third parties and middlemen inherent in a traditional securities offering, leading to greater efficiencies, lower costs, and a faster issuance process.
  • Blockchain technologies are inherently transparent, as the digital ledger is public. This makes the offering inherently more secure.
  • By selling tokens, companies can tap into financial markets across the world that would not be normally accessible. An investor from Asia or Europe can easily buy into a company STO, just as an investor from the United States.
  • Security tokens are considered more liquid because investors can buy, sell, and trade tokens around the clock.
  • The digital nature of the tokens makes corporate governance and voting easier and more transparent.

Another distinguishing characteristic of an STO is that a company can tokenize and sell fractional ownership in almost any real world asset – such as real estate, a machine, or even intellectual property. This opens up a host of possibilities and financing options that would otherwise be limited or unavailable with traditional securities. This is especially attractive to high-tech startups whose business model is already based on or related to the blockchain.

STOs should not be confused with ICOs (initial coin offerings). ICOs boomed in 2017, as some companies turned to unregistered token sales to raise funds outside of the traditional securities disclosure, registration, and other legal requirements. In 2017, the SEC issued an investor bulletin and clarified that these digital token sales constitute “investment contracts” that meet the SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946) test and therefore must be registered as securities under federal law. ICOs also are associated with several high-profile “exit scams,” where cryptocurrency promoters claimed big plans for a new crypto project, collected funds from investors, and then simply disappeared with the funds. Other ICOs purported to be “high-yield investment programs” that turned out to be nothing more than Ponzi schemes.

As cryptocurrency, NFTs, and other blockchain-based technology became more mainstream in 2021, it is important to recognize that the STO is a new way for innovative companies to raise funds. While these are still securities offerings that must comply with applicable regulations, the flexibility, transparency, and efficiency that these digital instruments offer are certainly attractive.

Want to know more? Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2022 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

What Every Business Owner Must Know About Cryptocurrency Systemic Risk

Whether your business is a full-scale investor in cryptocurrency and blockchain technology or whether you are simply using cryptocurrency to diversify your balance sheet or facilitate international transactions, you are assuming systemic risk. Systemic risk is basically the risk that the “system” in question will fail. The 2008 financial crisis is a recent example of the financial system’s failure due to overleveraged institutions and opaque and risky lending practices. Cryptocurrency and blockchain tech are quickly growing and becoming an integral part of the global financial markets – essentially evolving into another system. For example, sophisticated investors can self-direct their retirement accounts into cryptocurrencies and stake their entire savings on this growing tech.

Risk is part of any business. However, so is effective risk management, which particularly critical in the blockchain/cryptocurrency context, which operates outside of the safeguards and regulatory oversight common to traditional financial institutions. At the same time, existing tax, securities, commodities, and finance regulations still apply to crypto, and compliance is critical to the smooth functioning of your business. At a minimum, any business involved with blockchain tech should involve an experienced business attorney to develop their internal risk management protocols and have a plan for legal compliance, as well as systemic risk.

1. Existing Tax, Securities, and Other Laws Still Apply to Cryptocurrency.

First, and foremost, cryptocurrency is an asset and blockchain enterprises are businesses that are subject to general state and federal laws. While there is no central authority in the United States responsible for policing crypto markets, that does not mean that crypto business operate independent of the law. Government regulators are playing catch-up, and have repeatedly asserted their authority over cryptocurrency and related tech under existing laws. For example, 2020 was the first year that the IRS asked taxpayers about their crypto holdings. Enforcement units are gearing up to address tax evasion and close the multi-million dollar gap between actual income and what is reported to the IRS. The SEC and CFTC are also stepping up enforcement actions to head off fraudulent activity and lack of transparency in certain financial offerings. The Department of Treasury (through FinCen) is also stepping up oversight to enforce existing anti-money laundering frameworks.

The existing regulatory framework is far from perfect and is not well-suited to the unique characteristics of cryptocurrency. For example, why are some ICOs (initial coin offerings) securities, but established coins like Bitcoin and Ethereum are not securities? Capital gains taxes apply to cryptocurrency and stablecoins. But the IRS has not issued any guidance on NFTs. Are they going to be taxed like “property” or like collectibles, art, gold bullion, or something else? Will NFT tax rates depend on what the NFT is supposed to represent?

Stablecoins are a whole separate issue. Recently, a group of Treasury, SEC, and CFTC officials urged Congress to pass legislation to regulate stablecoins. In the “Report on Stablecoins,” the group noted existing SEC and CFTC authority to regulate these markets, but urged reform and legislation that is specific to the new technology.

For investors and innovators, legal compliance is the essential first step. Nothing stifles innovation like an IRS audit or an SEC investigation. Make sure to consult with an experienced attorney for guidance on the latest state of the quickly changing law in this area.

2. Decentralization Does Not Mean Risk-Free or Safe.

Second, the decentralized nature of cryptocurrency and blockchain tech in general lends itself to a false sense of security among investors and businesses. Some crypto advocates consider regulation unnecessary because blockchain tech is “decentralized.” The public ledger system purportedly means total transparency, equity, and fairness. In reality, a decentralized system is not immune from tampering or malfeasance.

For example, blockchain at its core is software that depends on coders and engineers upgrading the “chain,” fixing bugs, and making improvements. Someone somewhere determines forks and chain upgrades. Also, what about miners? What precludes off-chain influence (i.e. bribes) to miners that would impact the whole chains or cause them to verify certain blocks or transactions out of sequence?

Stablecoins are considered “safe” because the tokens are purportedly backed by fiat or equivalent reserves. But there is a lack of transparency between various stablecoins, different liquidity thresholds between reserves (for example, cash vs. money market vs. short term bonds), and variable redemption mechanisms and minimums. Additionally, is your stablecoin of choice based on a public blockchain or a permissioned blockchain? Permissioned blockchains limit access to the blockchain, providing more certainty as to who is responsible for the chain’s operation and integrity. At the same time, they reduce transparency and accountability.

Further, the federal government does not insure stablecoin or cryptocurrency deposits. If you stake cryptocurrency for a return, you are not insured or protected against the coin’s failure, a run, or illiquidity. If you are using a stablecoin to facilitate DeFi transactions, have a plan in case of network problems, chain disruptions, or backing failures. For instance, use several stablecoins to diffuse the risk.

As illustrated by the recent examples of the SQUID token and the Evolved Apes NFT, crypto tech is full of bad actors. The chain itself is not immune from malfeasance. Any business that fully depends on the integrity of the blockchain for its day to day operations must have safeguards. At a minimum, a crypto company must have a robust security system and team dedicated to detecting network health and chain anomalies. Financial hedging that diffuses the risk over multiple chains, cryptocurrencies, and other assets is also critical. Finally, established and documented due diligence protocols to assure investors, regulatory authorities, and lenders are a must.

3. Do Not Take the Internet For Granted.

Third, there is an inherent systemic risk to anything that depends wholly on the operation of the internet. Outages of certain sites or even network-wide service providers are not uncommon. Just recently, Facebook and Instagram were down for almost a full day. Comcast made headlines for its network outages across the United States on November 9, 2021. Directly related to cryptocurrency markets, exchanges like Coinbase have connectivity issues and other disruptions in times of market volatility. This can have direct adverse financial consequences for a business that depends on access to the crypto markets.

Due diligence protocols and internal safeguards are essential in this context. Offline copies of books and ledgers, at least backing up transactions history on a periodic basis. If you are storing crypto, look into offline (hardware) storage options for your code and data. Consider hedging and diversification.

Most important of all, have a plan. Cybercrime and ransomware insurance options are also worth looking into. Crypto and blockchain are existing, but are not without substantial risk. While government regulators are playing catch-up and are urging Congress to pass a risk control framework, legislation is not an instant process. In the meantime, plan for systemic risk as part of your business plan.

Want to know more? Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Are Real-Money Video Game Tournaments Legal?

Video games are quintessential contests of skill and online multiplayer modes are a must in most modern video games. And yes, playing skill video games for real money prizes is legal in the majority of U.S. states. Some of the most popular video games (Call of Duty, Fortnite, Magic: Arena, and others) frequently feature official in-game tournaments with real-money prizes for the top finishers. Fueled by the global popularity of esports, there is also a growing number of third-party esports tournament sites and apps. These third-party offerings are essentially on-demand, which means that there are always head-to-head challenges waiting and frequent “cash cups” with winners able to win a hundred dollars or even more.

Real-money game tournaments and contests serve as a more casual alternative to professional esports. Not everyone has the time (or the reflexes) to go pro or even compete at the collegiate level. But, you may be skilled enough to dominate your local group of friends at Call of Duty or FIFA and there are plenty of offerings to let you win real money prizes against online opponents. Some of the most innovative companies even integrate streaming (for example through Twitch) to add an exciting “audience” element to real money play. Anyone can feel like an esports pro. There is also a growing opportunity for market crossover, with streamers getting involved in real-money play and adding a whole new dimension to their entertainment potential, audience, and branding opportunities.

What kinds of legal issues will a contest or tournament organizer/developer encounter? As with any business, there are several distinct legal areas in play.

Esports competitions or tournaments are not expressly regulated or prohibited under U.S. federal or state law.

First, from a government regulation perspective, no states expressly prohibit esports or video game tournaments. However, there are several jurisdictions that prohibit any sort of real-money gaming. This is the case even if the game involves a pure contest of skill (even offline, like a hole-in-one contest). Accordingly, tournament organizers and app developers stay away from those restrictive jurisdictions.

In the remaining states, game contests, tournaments, and esports are not licensed under any sort of “gambling” or “fantasy sports” regulatory scheme. The largely unregulated market means that there are a number of service providers out there that disagree on where their product can be offered. Some are more conservative than others, but there is not a definitive list of where gaming competitions are legal or illegal. At least one state – Nevada – passed legislation to create an esports advisory board (within its Gaming Commission), to recommend best practices for maintaining integrity of esports competitions and related betting. According to Nevada lawmakers, they recognize the value in the esports competition industry and want to ensure Nevada remains an attractive investment environment for this burgeoning industry. At this time, the potential advisory committee is the closest any state has come to any sort of esports-specific legislation.

A lot depends on the specific competition and tournament model, as well as the types of games being played. For instance, are shuffled cards involved (Magic: The Gathering)? Or some other element of randomness (like team or opponent selection)? Are bots or AI players involved? How do all these elements interact and do they introduce a significant chance element that may affect the outcome? Does the randomness element render the game illegal “gambling”?

Third-party video game websites and apps implicate the intellectual property rights of the underlying game’s developers and may be subject to DMCA takedown notices or federal trademark lawsuits.

Second, esports competitions and tournaments do implicate intellectual property rights, specifically the rights of the game developers. A game’s developer (like Blizzard, Riot, or Epic) owns the copyrights in its games and underlying code. Third-party apps and websites operate without any sort of license from the developers, which may be a violation of copyright or trademark law. Disclaimers alone may not be enough – using game imagery, logos, or even gameplay footage may constitute copyright or trademark infringement. A player or streamer may be protected by the “fair use” copyright law exception, but a company that organizes and monetizes game tournaments is unlikely to prevail on this argument. At the same time, a properly run game tournament organizer may not have sufficient interaction with the game itself to violate IP rights. After all, the players are the ones playing. Each situation is highly fact-specific and there is certainly no bright line rule.

As real-money video game tournaments become more widespread, expect to see pushback from the game studios. At least one studio – Epic – has announced an aggressive stance towards third-party platforms that facilitate playing Epic’s games for real-money prizes (particularly Fortnite). However, as of the date of this article, no lawsuits have been filed.

Combining real-money tournaments with streaming is an attractive business model, but may involve complex licensing and contract issues.

Third, streaming tournaments and competitions, as well as partnering with known streamers, involves a number of contract law and licensing issues. Each streaming service has its own set of terms. Players (and organizers) streaming real-money game content must ensure that they are compliant with the terms or risk being banned from the platform. Further, who owns the streaming content? Normally, the creator has the intellectual property rights to their own content, but it is not so clear-cut when streaming a tournament or other organized contest. Tournament organizers should ensure that rights and expectations are clear from the outset, especially if a well-known esports streamer or player is involved. If the streamer is granting the organizer a license to showcase their gameplay, the license should at a minimum be in writing. Any royalties, cross-promotions, and sponsorships likewise need to be negotiated ahead of time. Even the best intentioned relationships go awry when money becomes involved.

For developers looking to launch a new esports or game tournament app or website, an experienced gaming attorney is a must-have. Artaev at Law has worked with a number of gaming companies from across the world and has the expertise you need. Reach out today to set up a meeting with Dan.

Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
Uncategorized

In-App Purchases No Longer Mandatory for Developers: Federal Court Issues Injunction As Part of Epic v. Apple Ruling.

There is no question about Apple’s dominance in the smartphone market. The iPhone accounts for approximately 50% of all smartphones in the United States and there are an estimated 1 billion iPhones across the globe. For developers looking to distribute their apps or games to as many customers as possible, the Apple App Store is a must. Of course, Apple tightly controls access and requires developers to comply with Apple’s terms and policies, including with respect to customer payments. For real-money skill-game developers, the App Store is even more important because it is essentially the only way to get their product onto mobile phones. In May 2021, Google banned real-money skill games from its Play store. Setting aside sideloading (risky) and progressive web apps (not familiar to all), if you want real-money skill games on a smartphone, Apple is your only option.

One of the more controversial App Store rules is the 30% commission on all transactions. In essence, whether a developer sells their app for a one-time fee, offers a reoccurring subscription, or provides an option for in-app purchases, 30% of the payment goes to Apple. In the gaming market, this model is especially profitable in so-called “freemium” games, which are free to download and play, but offer players the option to unlock additional content, levels, and other upgrades for an additional fee. The insanely popular game Fortnite is a great example of a game that’s free to download and play, but brought an estimated $5.1 billion in revenue from cosmetic and other optional items in 2020 alone. In response to increased media and regulatory pressure (including outside the United States), Apple modified its rules to allow for a reduced commission of 15% for “small” businesses that make less than $1 million in annual revenue. Recently, Apple further amended its polices to allow certain “reader” apps like Netflix or Spotify to redirect their users to outside the app for additional payment and subscription options. The out-of-app payment option was added in direct response to laws passed in South Korea and Japan.

In the United States, the recent court decision in the Epic v. Apple antitrust lawsuit unlocked the out-of-app payment options for all. In early 2020, Epic (the owner and developer behind Fortnite) decided to deliberately circumvent Apple’s rules against out-of-app payment options and offer mobile players a discounted option to purchase in-game currency directly through Epic’s website. Apple predictably responded by pulling Fortnite from the App Store, and Epic sued, alleging anti-competitive behavior and violations of various federal and state antitrust laws. Apple countersued for breach of contract, accusing Epic of deliberately breaching the terms of the App Store agreement and diverting Apple’s share of app revenue.

After a 16-day trial, the United States Court for the Northern District of California issued a 185 page decision largely in Apple’s favor and ordered Epic to pay Apple $6 million in breach of contract damages. However, the Court also found that Apple’s “steering” provisions that prohibited developers from offering alternative out-of-app payment options violated California’s antitrust laws. The Court issued a permanent injunction that precludes Apple from implementing these “steering” provisions, leaving developers free to include buttons, external links, and “other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms, in addition to In-App Purchasing.” The injunction will take effect on November 10, 2021.

What does this ruling mean for real-money skill-based game developers? It certainly opens up more options to direct customers to your external website, advertise promotional pricing, and innovate your business and pricing model without direct involvement from Apple. Additionally, the Epic v. Apple ruling also frees developers to communicate directly with customers through information obtained via the in-app registration process. At the same time, developer guideline 5.3.3 already prohibits in-app purchases from being used to “purchase credit or currency for use in conjunction with real money gaming of any kind.” In other words, real money skill games were treated like casino gambling apps and excluded from the in-app purchase mechanism. The Epic ruling simply means that all app developers will have access to a flexible business model and be able to determine how to best monetize their game without Apple dictating the business terms and imposing a mandatory 15-30% commission on revenue.

Nevertheless, real-money skill-based games remain subject to heightened review and scrutiny from Apple. Advertising through Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc., also requires a specialized (and sometimes lengthy) approval process. Skill-based real-money gaming operates in an unregulated area, and applicable laws and regulations change frequently. For example, the IRS recently signaled that it intends to tax daily fantasy sports wagers the same as sportsbook bets. Although DraftKings and FanDuel will likely fight the IRS’s interpretation of the Internal Revenue Code, any resulting ruling may impact the skill-gaming industry as well. Stay vigilant and retain an experienced gaming attorney to guide and consult your business the right way.


Have more questions? Do you need help getting your app through the review process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Categories
Uncategorized

Business Law Essentials for the Modern Video Game Company.

As a game developer, unless you are working on the new Ace Attorney game, law and lawyers are the last thing on your mind. But no matter how high-tech, innovative, and cutting-edge your product, video games and mobile apps are still a business and there are industry-specific legal areas to consider. Doing it right will protect your investment and ensure that your business grows in the right direction with minimum risk and liability. Artaev at Law specializes in legal issues facing video game and mobile app developers and also has extensive general business experience to help you run your company the right way.

The Fundamentals.

1. Form Your Corporation or LLC.

When starting your business, the first thing to do is to form a business entity. It is important to choose the right type of entity depending on your future goals and needs in mind. For example, if you are planning to solicit investors and venture capital, a Delaware corporation is likely your best option. In other situations, a limited liability company (“LLC”) may be a simpler approach, but at the same time may create unintended tax consequences in the future if you decided to merge, reorganize, or consolidate your company with others. Whatever form you choose, incorporation is critical for all business owners because it creates a separate business entity with its assets and liabilities independent of its owners. A formal business organization also helps address important governance, financial, and succession issues right at the outset.

To officially form your company, you file articles of incorporation (or organization) in the state where you want to be registered. An experienced business attorney can advise you on the right type of entity, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating in various states (i.e. should you form a Delaware corporation?) Every state requires an initial registration fee, an in-state registered agent to serve as your official point of contact, as well as an annual filing and renewal fee to keep your company current and in good standing.

2. Have an Attorney Draft Your Bylaws or Operating Agreement.

The next step is to have an attorney draft the bylaws or operating agreement. This internal governance document is absolutely critical. It spells out who owns the company, how decisions are made, how money is distributed, how shares are transferred, what happens if an owner dies, and many other important considerations. Even if you are a one-person business, the bylaws or articles of organization are still necessary when you want to open a bank account, obtain a business loan, sell all or part of your business, and otherwise ensure that you are running your business the right way. Having formal documents and procedures, as well as keeping written records of corporate meetings are also critical to maintaining the corporate form for liability protection purposes. Aggressive creditors have successfully argued that a business that does not observe such formalities is a “sham” and that a court should “pierce the corporate veil” to allow them access to an owner’s personal assets.

3. Separate Your Business Money and Assets.

Maintaining a separate bank account and finances for your business is another vital step. Virtually all business problems are linked to money. A separate business finance setup (including a bank account) avoids commingling personal and business funds, which is another circumstance that could expose you to liability. Further, failing to separate business and personal expenses and properly account for distributions creates a very difficult and unpredictable tax situation at the end of the year. For example, if you use personal credit cards for business expenses, make sure to keep records and promptly and accurately reimburse yourself. Also, if you apply for an SBA or other loan, make sure that the loan is disbursed to your business account and not to your own personal account (yes, this actually happened with one of my clients). Otherwise, you are creating an accounting, tax, and legal nightmare – and risking an IRS audit.

Make sure to reserve adequate money for income taxes from any operational income. Also, state and federal taxes must be paid on a quarterly estimated basis, since as a business owner there is no employer automatically withholding taxes from your paycheck. If you have employees, you will need to make sure to pay the appropriate payroll, worker’s compensation, and unemployment taxes. If you do not have employees, self-employment tax is still something that must be calculated and paid periodically.

Finally, on cryptocurrency or “crypto.” If you are planning on using crypto as part of your business, there is a whole separate set of considerations. The IRS considers crypto taxable property, including stablecoins. Taking payment in crypto may be innovative and position your business as “high-tech,” but there are obstacles to using crypto instead of fiat currency in running your business. For example, even if a vendor allows you to pay them for goods or services in crypto, each transaction is a taxable event. The IRS considers you to have sold crypto and incurred capital gains tax liability each and every time. There are also state and federal laws that preclude you from paying wages in crypto, but bonuses and other discretionary pay are another story. Crypto may have promising implications for the future, but there are many practical obstacles for business owners interested in integrating crypto into their day-to-day business.

Intellectual Property.

Intellectual property or IP law is of paramount importance to game developers and designers. On one hand, you want to protect your own creations and inventions against unscrupulous competitors seeking to copy your product. On the other hand, you have to be able to protect yourself from others’ IP claims, including DMCA copyright takedown notices and cease-and-desist letters.

Intellectual property generally consists of three main categories: (1) patent; (2) copyright; and (3) trademarks.

1. Patents.

Patents are most often associated with scientific discoveries and mechanical devices. In the video game context, a so-called utility patent may be available to protect a game’s unique mechanics or a specific gameplay methodology. The protected design must be unique and non-obvious. But patents do not protect the code itself, the game concept, or idea. For example, Skillz.com, a leader in the real-money skill-game market, has over 50 patents, including a patent for technology that ensures fair and level asynchronous play. Skillz does not have a patent for any specific game played on their platform and in fact, there are a lot of copycat apps on the Apple App Store that are essentially the same games as those available through Skillz. The downside of patents is that patent protection is fairly expensive to obtain and to police, involves publication and public disclosure of the technology, and may even be waived by playtesting certain concepts.

2. Copyright.

Copyright law protects creative works like books, movies, music, and yes, video games. The underlying code for a game is also protected by copyright and pirates who illegally copy the code and sell copies of the game are violating federal copyright law. Most recently, copyright claims have come up in the context of streaming and whether streamers are allowed to use certain music and other creative elements during their broadcasts.The creative concepts – or the “theme” of the game – are also protected. This means the storyline, the characters, art, music, box design, and other distinct creative and thematic elements. But not everything is protected by copyright.

Distinct from the “theme” of the game are the game mechanics, which cannot be copyrighted. “Game mechanics” is the actual gameplay – this can be as simple as moving the joystick to move an avatar around in a virtual environment. The United States Copyright Act codifies this concept and expressly states that copyright protection does not extend to “any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.” 17 USC 102(b). The distinction between the copyrightable theme and the non-copyrightable game mechanics is not always clear and there may be some overlap. Additionally, the concept of “fair use” protects certain commentary, criticism, and parody from an infringement claim.

3. Trademarks.

Trademark protection exists chiefly to prevent customer confusion and to protect the integrity of a brand. In the video game context, trademark will primarily protect the name of the game, but can also protect unique “trade dress” elements that constitute unique menu or box designs, or user interface elements. A trademark can also protect a slogan or recognizable phrase associated with a game.

Trademarks are relatively easy to obtain and the USPTO website allows you to search for existing trademarks to ensure that your branding does not infringe on existing products. Trademarks also vary in strength depending on whether they are more generic and descriptive, or unique and arbitrary. For example, the game name “Grand Theft Auto” is also the term for a certain felony associated with vehicular theft. The name literally describes a core game concept (stealing cars), so it would be considered either a “suggestive” or “descriptive” mark. On the other side of the spectrum, an entirely unique “fanciful” or “coined” mark enjoys the strongest protection – for example the terms “Skyrim” or “Warcraft” (at least arguably) do not have any other meaning outside the game context.

4. Other Intellectual Property Issues.

The most two common questions facing game developers are: (1) How can I prevent someone from copying my game? and (2) How do I avoid getting in trouble for copying someone else’s game? While you may have taken steps to protect your intellectual property, the fact is that games are especially vulnerable to knockoffs and plagiarism. International law may even become an issue if an overseas company takes and repurposes your idea. By hiring an attorney as part of your team, you can ensure that you have taken the right steps to obtain copyright protection for your user interface, graphics, art, etc., and that you have properly registered your trademarks. An attorney can also ensure that any contractors – such as artists, coders, or composers – properly assign all rights back to the game developer through “work for hire” agreements. Licensing agreements with any publisher must also delineate the rights and responsibilities of all parties. Royalties and assignments must be fair, clear, and definite. If you have a co-designer or a business partner, you must absolutely have a business agreement before your idea starts making money, so there are no surprises or hard feelings. If there are copyright concerns or knockoffs, a DMCA takedown notice or demand letter is often an effective tool to dissuade would-be thieves. Conversely, if you are receive a takedown notice or demand from another designer, you need to have an effective and prepared attorney ready to respond.

Regulatory Concerns.

Most game developers are not going to encounter regulatory issues or attract the attention of state or local prosecutors. However, if you are considering real-money play (such as skill games) you will need a legal opinion as to where your game may be offered. Payment processors, advertisement platforms, and distributors may all require additional information and assurances as part of their internal review and approval process.

Finally, if you are distributing internationally, you need to be aware of the region-specific laws and regulations. Some regions are more friendly to gaming than others – for example, real-money skill-games are popular and abundant in India, but there is no uniform national-level law. Hong Kong is a haven for real-money gaming, yet at the same time, China does not allow them. Plus, there are international tax treaties and financial regulations to navigate.

Whatever your game and whether you are a veteran or just starting out, an experienced gaming attorney can be a great asset to your business.

Contact Artaev at Law PLLC to set up your initial consultation. We are Michigan’s gaming law firm and we specialize in the unique concerns that you may encounter as a game developer.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.


© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

The Three Types of Skill-Based Real-Money Games: Room for Innovation, Not Stagnation.

The skill-based real-money gaming market remains a popular and innovative business environment. The draw for players is that they can play games and win real money, but also improve their chances of winning through skill. Unlike gambling or casino-style games, skill-based gaming is not mathematically skewed in favor of “the house.” There are many types of games to choose from – card-based solitaire-like games, bingo, bubble puzzlers, trivia, and even sophisticated physics-based racing games. Best of all, unlike casino gambling and sports betting, skill-based real-money games are legal and available in the majority of U.S. states and internationally as well.

For developers, the upside is obvious. Monetization of gaming has always been profitable and a lucrative business – hence the tightly-regulated casino and sportsbetting markets. Designing a mobile game instantly gives the developer access to customers across the world through a well-established distribution network (i.e. the Apple App Store). When done right, real-money skill games are not required to be licensed or otherwise regulated in a majority of the states. This makes the real-money skill game market very accessible to most developers, including smaller studios with limited budgets and without the lobbying firepower that would otherwise be required to enter the money gaming market.

These factors combine into a highly-competitive market. This makes it difficult to design a profitable game without innovation. For example, the Skillz.com platform (publicly traded as SKLZ on the NYSE) boasts over 30 million players and over 30,000 developers. However, according to Skillz’s August 2021 prospectus filed with the SEC, only three games accounted for 74% of all revenue in 2021. These so-called “big three” are Tether’s “Solitaire Cube” and “21 Blitz,” and Big Run’s “Blackout Bingo.” Predictably, there are number of copycat games that are very similar to these “big three” in design and gameplay. To be successful, developers must innovate. As part of their development and marketing efforts, all companies in this space need to understand the three main types of skill games, each with its own set of regulatory nuances:

Pure-Skill Games

The first category of games is the “pure skill” variety that are similar to the popular Solitaire Cube, 21 Blitz, and Blackout Bingo that account for such a large share of the market. These games pit players in head-to-head contests, multiplayer battles, or tournaments the outcome of which depends solely on the skill of the player. For example, in Solitaire Cube, players are given the same deck and are scored on how well and fast they play Klondike Solitaire using these cards. Players pay an entry fee, with the winner receiving a cash prize.

These “pure skill” games do not involve any other factors than the players’ own skill in determining the outcome. There are limitless possibilities in this genre – anything from knife-throwing games, to cup flipping or “beer pong” style contests, to trivia games fall into this category. Some particularly innovative developers have even developed sophisticated physics-based games (similar to Angry Birds) that take serious dexterity, planning, and logic to master.

Pure-skill games are legal under U.S. federal law, as well as in the majority of U.S. states. Because skill games involve the opportunity to win real money, the Apple App store and various social media advertising platforms require special approval and an application that must be accompanied by a legal opinion from qualified gaming counsel. Payment processors also require special approval, a physical presence in the United States, and have their own set of standards and rules that must be met before your gaming account is approved.

Fantasy Sports or Market Games

The second category of skill games are those that are similar to the daily fantasy sports (“DFS”) contests offered by DraftKings and FanDuel. Generally, participants pay an entry fee and then are given a virtual currency budget to spend on a lineup of sports players to be on their fantasy team. The fantasy team then scores points based on real-world performance and the participants that accumulate the most points can win a cash prize.

Traditional sports and leagues like the NBA, NFL, MLB, and NHL are not the only options. There is at least one fantasy esports platform that lets players put together a lineup of their favorite gaming stars. There are also fantasy stock market games that let players pick a portfolio of real-world shares and win prizes based on how well their portfolio does against other players.

The key distinction between these fantasy games and pure-skill games is that the outcome of a fantasy game is not determined solely by a player’s skill. While it certainly takes knowledge and research to put together the best team, points are awarded based on real-world performance that is outside of the participants’ control. In fantasy sports, a particular player might have a bad game, get injured, or fall victim to bad officiating or adverse weather conditions. In fantasy stocks, a particular stock might enjoy a sudden price spike due to a merger announcement or a new product. Or, a stock might quickly lose value due to an SEC investigation or other unpredictable real world factors. In 2020, the IRS issued two separate memoranda analyzing and addressing this distinction, concluding that DFS involves “wagering” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code. At a minimum, the IRS’s position matters from a tax perspective: does your skill-based game involve “wagers” subject to excise tax?

DFS and similar fantasy games are more regulated than “pure-skill” games. DraftKings and FanDuel currently offer their DFS products in 43 states and are a good regulatory bellwether. In some states, DFS is offered as an unregulated skill-game product that falls outside of the state’s definition of “gambling.” In other states, legislatures have passed laws that expressly exclude DFS from “gambling,” but do not otherwise regulate or license DFS. In contrast, states like Michigan have enacted comprehensive licensing regulations for DFS. There are also states that outright ban any sort of real-money wagering. And, there are states that have issued DFS-adverse legal opinions and are embroiled in litigation to decide whether DFS constitutes illegal “gambling.” In other words, the regulatory landscape for DFS-type games is complicated and requires guidance from an experienced gaming attorney.

Arcade-Style Skill Games

The third category does not involve mobile phones, computers, or the internet at all. Rather, these games look like arcade cabinets or even like slot machines, and are found in certain bars, restaurants, and other public establishments. Originally, these games were purposefully designed to look and feel like slot machines, but introduced additional player choice or input features so that they would involve skill and purportedly fall outside of the definition of “gambling” in most states. Authorities in some states have cracked down on these types of machines (sometime called “nudge machines” or “skill slots”), concluding that the claimed skill element was a sham or otherwise insufficient to render the machine a true game of skill.

Despite the ongoing pandemic and the ubiquity of gaming options on mobile devices and the internet, these cabinet-type skill games are still thriving. One particularly popular game called “Dragon’s Ascent” has attracted the attention of regulators in the D.C. area and has sparked debate over whether the game (which pays out cash prizes) is an illegal gambling device. Players score points by shooting magic balls at dragons to capture them, using the joystick and buttons to direct and time their shots. The two-player version looks like a traditional arcade cabinet. The eight-player version adds an impressive-looking table that doubles as a screen. Both versions include drink holders, and the game’s promotional material specifically targets bars as a way for them to “offer something new.”

Although the barriers and start-up costs to enter into this specific market are significantly higher than the mobile game field, the presence of arcade-style skill games demonstrates the level of innovation and variety in the industry. Bars and restaurants that survive the pandemic may very well be interested in real-money skill games as one way to bring customers back to their in-person establishments. It is also possible that bars and restaurants will partner with more skill game developers to introduce mobile or more individualized real-money games to their establishments. After all, having a pint and betting $5 on a game of pool or darts is one of the most traditional and familiar ways to bet on a game of skill. Technology may advance, but people’s desire to compete, wager, and win real money remains the same.

Have more questions? Do you need a legal opinion or help getting your game through the regulatory process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

IRS Rulings on Daily Fantasy Sports Wagering: What Does This Mean for Skill-Based Gaming?

Real-money skill-based games are very popular across the world and the United States is no exception. Generally, real-money skill games allow players to compete against others in various games where the outcome is determined by the relative skill of the players (as opposed to chance). In simple terms, it is the same betting your friend $5 on a game of darts or pool at the local pub. Except these games are played online – most frequently on smartphones. Games range from timed solitaire contests (using the same deck), to knife throwing or cup flipping games, to trivia contests. Because chance does not determine the outcome, most states’ anti-gambling laws do not prohibit skill-based games. U.S. based and international companies have been working to invest in this space, using the increasing availability of the internet and smartphone apps to provide entertainment to players seeking to compete against others and win some money in the process.

I have written extensively about legality of skill gaming, as well as the obstacles that developers need to overcome to get their games up and running and advertised.

Besides private company gatekeepers, local law enforcement, and regulatory authorities, there is a new obstacle for skill-based gaming companies. This time it comes from the IRS and could have broad market implications beyond simply paying taxes.

In 2020, the IRS issued two related memoranda regarding Daily Fantasy Sports (“DFS”) wagers. Recall that DFS is an accelerated version of traditional fantasy sports, giving players a chance to set lineups and compete on a daily basis, rather than having just one team for the entire season. DFS is available in 43 states through the two major operators: DraftKings and FanDuel. Similar to pure-skill games, DFS distinguishes itself from gambling by emphasizing that relative skill of the players determines the outcome (as opposed to chance). In some of the 43 states, DFS operates pursuant to government license. In other states, DFS is unregulated and either expressly or implicitly exempt from the statutory definition of “gambling.”

In the first 2020 memo, the IRS considered whether DFS operators (i.e. DraftKings and FanDuel) were required to pay excise tax on wagers pursuant to IRC §§ 4401 et seq. Under federal tax law, each “wager” is subject to excise tax – sportsbooks are very familiar with this provision that requires the bookmaker to pay tax on every bet accepted from a patron. In answering in the affirmative, the IRS defined “wager” without any reference to an element of chance:

“[T]he statutory language in IRC §§ 4401 and 4421 does not differentiate whether an activity involves skill, chance, or some combination of the two. Most importantly, whether DFS is a game of skill for state gambling statute purposes is not relevant for determining whether DFS is wagering for federal excise tax purposes.”

IRS AM 2020-009

At the same time, the IRS did not overturn Revenue Ruling 57-521, which was a 1957 opinion on whether a puzzle contest was a taxable gaming transaction. Rather, the IRS distinguished that in the puzzle contest “the contest participant’s own skill was the only factor involved in winning the puzzle game and there was no chance element at all.” In DFS, the participants use their skill to select a lineup, but then earn points based on the real-world performance of the selected athletes (over which the participants have no control). The IRS emphasized that no matter how educated and skilled a DFS participant may be, there is always a chance that the chosen player or players will perform poorly that particular day, get injured, or suffer adverse effects on their performance from the weather or officiating. Thus, the IRS concluded that the “skill” involved in DFS was similar to the skill involved in traditional sports betting or horse race “handicapping.” Finally, the IRS also explained that that the rate of excise tax (0.25% or 2%) depends on whether DFS is “authorized” under the law of the state where the wager is accepted. The IRS did not explain whether “authorized” means DFS is operating pursuant to express state license or is simply outside of the particular state’s anti-gambling legislation.

Two months after the excise tax memorandum, the IRS relied on essentially the same analysis to conclude that DFS wagers are “wagering transactions” that can be used to offset wagering income during a taxable year under IRC § 165(d). Effectively, DFS wagers are treated the same as gambling losses under the IRC. In its legal analysis, the IRS reiterated:

Any argument a DFS transaction is not wagering because it is based on skill must fail because elements of chance beyond the participant’s control ultimately determine the outcome of the transaction

IRS Memorandum 202042015

Why does the IRS’s DFS analysis matter for skill-based real-money gaming? Two main reasons: (1) The IRS’s interest in DFS transaction could signal increased tax scrutiny for real-money skill-gaming operators; and (2) the IRS’s legal analysis of whether a skill game is actually gambling/wagering could be adopted by states that currently do not regulate skill-based gaming.

1. Do real-money skill-based game companies have to pay federal excise tax?

There is no doubt that pure-skill games are still exempt from the definition of “wager” and “wagering transaction” for tax purposes. However, it is unclear whether there can be “any” chance at all. The first IRS memo cited a 1957 puzzle game ruling to distinguish pure-skill games, noted “there was no chance element at all,” and concluded that “[t]he existence of chance indicates that DFS contests are distinguishable” from the pure-skill puzzle game at issue in the 1957 memo.

In the second memo, IRS revised its position slightly to conclude that “the test is not whether there is an element of chance or skill, but which is the dominating element that determines the result of the game.” Regardless, the IRS took the position that the outcome of a DFS contest is predominantly determined by chance (as opposed to skill). DFS industry leaders have predictably issued statements opposing the ruling, calling it “deeply flawed” and inconsistent with state court decisions that have held that DFS is a game of skill.

If you are a real-money skill game developer, it is critical to determine whether your game has any element of chance at all. In other words, is your game more fantasy sports or pure contest? If there is any element of chance at all, you must determine whether skill “is the dominating element” of the game. Most, if not all, real-money skill games will pass this second test. At the same time, if your game is more like fantasy sports (for example a stock market or cryptocurrency picking game), your game will likely be considered to involve taxable wagering. This obviously subjects you to the excise tax under IRC §§ 4401 et seq. An added wrinkle is whether you owe tax at the 0.25% “authorized” rate or the 2% “unauthorized” rate. Most skill-based operators operate without a license or governmental approval – but at the same time, they only operate in states where their activities are not prohibited by state anti-gambling laws.

2. Will states adopt the IRS definition of “wager” to regulate real-money skill-based gaming?

Additionally, the IRS analysis may be adopted by states seeking to regulate or prohibit real-money skill games. For instance, if you are paying excise taxes to the IRS, a state regulator can easily use that fact to argue that your game is actually “wagering” and therefore constitutes “illegal gambling.” This is especially troubling because the first “excise tax” memo seems to require “chance only. It is also possible that real-money skill games will be considered “wagering” for the purposes of excise tax imposed by IRC §§ 4401 et seq but not “wagering” for the purposes of IRC § 165(d).

Stay tuned for more on this developing area. It is likely that DraftKings and FanDuel are headed for a showdown with the IRS over the excise tax issue. Any resulting Tax Court decision (or even settlement) will have significant repercussions for the skill-based gaming industry.

Have more questions? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal or tax advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserve

A Guide to Getting Your Skill-Based Real-Money Game Approved in the United States.

Skill-based real-money gaming has been a popular form of entertainment across the world for hundreds of years. From Roman legionnaires wagering on an early version of backgammon to $5 eight-ball games at your local pool hall, skill games have always attracted players looking for a chance to win real money. With smart phones in every pocket, skill-based gaming has entered a new era where anyone with an internet connection can play various money skill games through their phone or computer and stake anywhere from $0.25 to hundreds of dollars on the outcome.

Gaming is a rapidly growing industry and the skill-based real-money market is no exception. Indeed, there is already at least one publicly-traded California-based company (Skillz.com; SKLZ) investing substantial resources in the real-money skill-based U.S. market. However, any sort of real-money gaming business implicates federal and state-level regulation. While a government license is not necessary in most states, your game must still pass private sector review. Apple’s App Store is indispensable in the current market; advertising through social media like Facebook is another must. Banking and payment processing is likewise an integral part of your ability to run a business.

I have advised a number of companies, both international and U.S. based, on the legality of their skill-based real-money games. Through Artaev at Law, I have prepared detailed memorandums and analysis for a number of companies, as well as provided consultation to investors seeking more information about the real-money skill-games market. As a game developer, here is what you need to know:

1. Get Your Game to the Players.

If you were to get into the full-scale casino gambling market, you would have to comply with stringent state-level regulatory requirements, pay substantial application and licensing fees, and otherwise deal with an intricate governmental regulatory framework. Further, in the few states where casinos are even legal, there is only a limited number of licenses that a state will issue. In other words, it is impossible. But real-money skill gaming operates outside the gambling regulatory framework, which means you don’t have to go through a government licensing or regulatory approval process to offer your product (in most states).

Instead, real-money skill game providers find themselves faced with so-called private company gatekeepers. The popularity of real-money skill gaming is in large part due to the ubiquity of the smartphone. Apple’s App Store is the only practical way to get real-money skill games onto iPhones (no, people will not “unlock” their iPhones to sideload your real-money skill game, especially when the App Store already has a robust selection of these games that are easy to download and use). Google’s Play store does not currently allow real-money skill games, so there developers must either provide sideloading options or use a Progressive Web Application (PWA).

The bottom line is that developers must pass Apple’s “gatekeeping” to even get their app on the market. That means complying with the App Store Review Guidelines. Section 5.3.4 is particularly important:

5.3.4 Apps that offer real money gaming (e.g. sports betting, poker, casino games, horse racing) or lotteries must have necessary licensing and permissions in the locations where the app is used, must be geo-restricted to those locations, and must be free on the App Store.

Apple considers real-money skill games to fall into this category, even though skill games do not depend on chance like the “sports betting, poker, casino games, horse racing” examples. This guideline can be distilled into three requirements: (1) The app must be legal where you are offering it; (2) The app must be geo-restricted to only those locations where it is legal; and (3) the app must be free.

The first requirement is the most important and the most confusing for app developers. How do you demonstrate that your app has “necessary licensing and permissions” if the states where you are offering your real-money skill games do not regulate such games? This is a situation where a legal opinion or memorandum from an experienced gaming attorney is helpful. In general, such a legal opinion will describe your game, explain how the game fits within existing federal regulations, and then present a state-by-state analysis (supported by applicable statutory and case law citations) to show that the skill game does not violate those states’ anti-gambling prohibitions or any other law.

The second requirement of geo-restriction is self-explanatory. Your app can only offer real-money gaming if the user verifies their location in a state where such gaming is legal. You can still offer practice or play-money games without geo-restriction (or if the user does not want to or cannot verify their location).

The third requirement is that the app must be free. Section 5.3.3 of the review guidelines further clarifies that “in-app purchase” cannot be used to purchase credit or currency for use in the real-money gaming app. That means that you will need to set up some sort of external mechanism for deposits, link the user’s existing account and balance to the app, and ensure compliance with the external payment processors’ requirements.

Once submitted, the review process can take between several weeks to more than a month. A lot depends on whether your app is similar to other apps already approved or whether it is something completely new. Other factors, like the reviewer or the law firm reviewing the legal analysis may also impact the timeline.

2. Advertise Your Game.

Advertising is critical to your app’s success and online advertising platforms have special rules for real-money games. Social media companies like Facebook and Twitter require prior approval and permission before running your gaming ad. The process is similar for both platforms and generally involves filling out a questionnaire, selecting the geographic areas you are targeting, providing a link to your app’s website, and submitting a legal opinion that your app comports with the law where it will be advertised. Google and YouTube (owned by Google) do not currently allow real-money skill game advertising.

This process may be a bit more lengthy than getting approval from the App Store. Depending on the nature of your product, your location, and the platform, the process may take several months. The social media platform may also come back with additional specific legal questions for your counsel to answer. The level of follow up and scrutiny is hard to predict because the social media companies farm out the review to outside law firms, which have their own standards and review processes.

3. Set Up Your Payment Processor and Bank.

Once your game is live and advertised, it’s time to start making money. There are a lot payment processors out there (PayPal, Square, etc.) and each has their own set of rules and guidelines for business accounts. The federal Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act applies to payment processors, so they must be especially careful not to facilitate illegal gambling activities. Credit card companies present another potential obstacle, as credit card companies often lump skill-based gaming with gambling into the 7995 merchant code.

For example, after states started rolling out regulated sport-betting options, Visa issued guidance that made its payment services available for “all transactions that are consistent with local, federal, and international laws.” Visa introduced new 7800-series merchant codes for legal gambling, but none of those codes apply to real-money skill gaming transactions. Practically, this means that skill-gaming transactions may still fall under the blanket 7995 code and Visa may not authorize the transaction. Nor does Visa issue an MVV (merchant verification value) for 7995 merchants, meaning that skill-based real money gaming companies are limited as to their direct-pay options.

This essentially requires skill-game companies to explore options through payment providers like PayPal. Provided you are based in the United States and can link a bank account, the process should be straightforward. If you are based in another country however, there is a whole another set of hurdles to overcome.

There’s More.

Getting your game approved, advertised, banked is only the first step. You will also need robust terms and conditions that govern your relationship with your users, which is especially critical when dealing with real-money gaming and facing potential payout disputes. A privacy policy is also a must, especially if you are offering your game internationally. Then there is the issue of taxation and whether you should be paying excise tax on skill-based game wagers. Real-money skill-based gaming is a hot market, but requires experienced legal counsel to get through these various issues.

Have more questions? Do you need help getting your app through the review process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Stablecoin Taxation and Securities Regulation: What Every Investor Must Know.

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies backed by other assets like fiat currency reserves, precious metals, commercial paper, and even portfolios made up of other cryptocurrencies. By pegging their value to another asset, stablecoins attempt to decrease price volatility and achieve a more “stable” price than uncollateralized cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. As I previously wrote, stablecoins may be particularly useful for international trade and business due to their predictable value and the ability to avoid wire delays and to minimize transaction costs. Stablecoins are also not targets of speculation or artificial price increases due to external events like Elon Musk’s SNL appearances or even China’s clampdown on Bitcoin mining. If the stablecoin is pegged to the value of the dollar, it will still be worth $1 regardless of whether there is a sudden spike in demand or supply.

Other than potential business use, stablecoins are also a popular investment medium. Certain exchanges have offered attractive interest rates on stablecoin holdings, ranging from Coinbase offering 4% on USD Coin (USDC) to double-digit returns on some lesser exchanges and stablecoins. As always, do your due diligence and make sure you know where your money is going before transferring any significant amount of cash. Also, it may be worthwhile to test the liquidity or withdrawal time with smaller deposits before investing any large amounts.

Just like with traditional cryptocurrency, there are two main legal areas that affect stablecoins: tax and securities regulation. Here are the latest “must knows” in each area:

Stablecoins are taxed like property and are subject to capital gains tax. Cryptocurrency is not “currency” as far as the IRS is concerned – rather, for taxation purposes, it is treated like property and subject to capital gains tax. This gets tricky, especially with stablecoins that are pegged 1:1 to the dollar. Buying stablecoins (or any crypto) for dollars is not a taxable event. However, using stablecoins to purchase goods and services is a taxable event that must be reported, even if your capital gains are zero.

For instance, if you buy 1,000 USDC for $1,000, that is not taxable. Then, when you pay a Romanian engineer 1,000 USDC in exchange for a circuit board design, the IRS deems that you have sold the USDC at the market rate in exchange for the engineering services. The difference between your cost basis and your sell price is the capital gain. Where the stablecoin is pegged 1:1 to the dollar, the capital gain will be $0 (your purchase price and sale price are the same). In fact, you may even realize a loss that you can use to offset your income if you paid a transaction fee. Transaction fees are added to your cost basis, so if you paid a $10 transaction fee to buy 1,000 USDC, your cost basis is $1,010 and when you sell for $1,000, you just netted a $10 loss. Also, you can end up with capital gains or losses if you are transacting large amounts of stablecoin – for example if you sell 50,000 USDT (Tether) when it’s price fluctuated slightly to $1.01, you just received a $500 capital gain.

Additionally, if you are earning interest on your USDT holdings, interest is taxable like ordinary income. In other words, buying stablecoin for fiat currency is not taxable, but earning stablecoin through staking is taxable. Just like you pay income tax on interest earned from your savings account, you will incur income tax on cryptocurrency gains. Finally, when you use your earned USDT to buy something or convert to cash or another cryptocurrency, that is a reportable taxable event subject to capital gains tax because for IRS purposes, you just sold property – your cryptocurrency.

Some stablecoins may be regulated like securities. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforces U.S. securities laws, which apply to a wide range of publicly-available investment products like stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and investment contracts where investors provide capital in exchange for expected returns. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are not considered securities because they are exchange mediums and in the SEC’s view, are no different than a foreign currency like the Euro or the Japanese Yen. At the same time, the SEC has scrutinized new coin offerings (also called initial coin offerings or ICOs) and concluded that they may constitute investment contracts if there are facts that indicate the buyer is “expecting a profit to be derived from the efforts of others.” See generally SEC v W.J. Howey Co., 328 US 293 (1946) (where the Supreme Court held that shares in a citrus grove operation were investment contracts subject to securities laws because the investors provided capital with the expectation that workers’ efforts in harvesting oranges would yield profits). Certain stablecoins, especially those that seek capitalization through ICOs and promise a percentage return through “staking,” will be considered “investment contracts” required to register with the SEC and provide public information like any other security.

There are also some stablecoins that are backed by securities like corporate and municipal bonds, mutual funds, and other publicly-traded instruments that are themselves regulated by the SEC. There is little doubt that these security-backed stablecoins are considered derivatives because their value is derived from the value of regulated securities. SEC regulation will require stablecoin issuers to disclose additional information about their companies to the public. Already there is some concerning information release ahead of Circle’s (the issuer of USDC) intent to go public – USDC reserves are only61% cash and money market funds, with the rest divided between U.S. and foreign treasury bonds, municipal, and corporate debt. Previously, the 1:1 stablecoin issuers represented that each coin was backed by actual cash reserves, which were regularly audited. Apparently, that is not the precise reality.

Finally, stablecoins are also facing increased regulatory scrutiny from central bank authorities. Federal Reserve officials have expressed their concerns about the effect of stablecoins on the credit markets. Stablecoins also threaten the ability of the Federal Reserve to regulate monetary supply to stimulate the economy and control inflation. For instance, if a coin like USDC gains widespread adoption, a private company like Circle will be able to regulate monetary supply by increasing and decreasing interest rates. Expect to see increased guidance and regulation from the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve in the near future. It would not be surprising to see stablecoin issuers to be treated as banks in certain circumstances.

Want to know more? Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Ask the Crypto Tax Lawyer: Offsetting Capital Gains Through Loss Harvesting.

Update: As of November 10, 2021, Congress is in the process of considering legislation to preclude loss-harvesting through cryptocurrency sales. Congress is also considering other amendments to the Tax Code and other laws to address cryptocurrency specifically. As this is a rapidly developing issue, it is critical that you consult with a tax attorney or other professional about your specific situation and the current state of the law before making any transactions or business decisions.

More than half-way through 2021, cryptocurrency remains an extremely popular investment. Although volatile and subject to unpredictable regulation (yes, that means China), the market has experienced substantial growth. Exchanges like Coinbase and integration with PayPal make owning, trading, and speculating in cryptocurrency easy. Sophisticated investors have even added cryptocurrency into their self-directed retirement portfolios, banking on the continued growth and popularity of the decentralized exchange medium.

As I have previously written, the IRS is keeping a close eye on cryptocurrency investors, transactions, and markets, looking to capture taxes on hundreds of millions in underreported or unreported income. In other words, crypto taxes are going to be an issue for many in the coming tax years, especially after the Biden administration’s mandatory $10,000 or more transaction reporting rule goes into effect in 2023. However, with proper planning and strategy, there are ways to reduce your tax liability even if you are planning to liquidate your crypto positions in the near term.

As a basic matter, know that the IRS classifies cryptocurrency as “property,” which means that it is subject to capital gains tax. General capital gains reduction strategies work for cryptocurrency as well as they do for more traditional property like investment real estate, stocks, and bonds. For instance, waiting at least 365 days to sell lets you take advantage of the lower long-term capital gains tax rate. Selling in a lower income year where your overall income puts you in a lower tax bracket is another strategy.

One advanced tax strategy involves taking advantage of the so-called wash sale rule. Or rather, it is taking advantage of the fact that the wash sale rules does not apply to cryptocurrencies (yet). Under Treasury Regulation 26 CFR 1.1091-1, an investor cannot sell “stock or securities” at a loss, use the loss to reduce taxable income, and then immediately repurchase the stock or security. Under the wash sale rule, there is a 30-day waiting period before purchasing the same or substantially the same stock or security – if an investor repurchases the security within the 30-day restricted period, the loss will be added to the cost basis of the repurchased security and reduce capital gains on the sale of the repurchased security, but it will not be treated as an investment loss to reduce general tax basis. In other words, you cannot manufacture losses in a bear market to reduce your taxable income that you receive from other investments, rentals, or wages.

The IRS has been clear that cryptocurrency is treated as “property” for tax purposes. However, whether it is a “stock or security” remains unanswered and both IRS Notice 2014-21 and the recently amended FAQ are silent on the issue. There is no express definition of “stock or securities” for the purposes of the wash sale rule. Looking elsewhere in the Internal Revenue Code, the definitions of stock and securities in various other sections include traditional shares, notes, bonds, and the like. Indeed, in 1988 the United States Tax Court adopted a narrow interpretation of the Code, holding that stock options were not considered “stock or securities.” Gantner v. Commissioner (91 T.C. 713 (1988). Congress responded by amending the wash sale rule to expressly include stock options, but still did not enact a definition of “securities” for the purpose of the rule.

Based on the current Code and Regulations and the lack of IRS guidance on the issue, there is a strong argument that cryptocurrencies are not “stock or securities” for the purposes of the wash sale rule. What this means is that crypto investors can take advantage of loss harvesting to accrue losses and use those losses to offset income. For example, if you buy one Bitcoin for $30,000 and the next day the price drops to $20,000, you can sell the Bitcoin at a loss of $10,000, “harvest” the loss, and repurchase the Bitcoin for $20,000 shortly thereafter. You still own 1 Bitcoin, but now you have accumulated a loss that you can use to offset capital gains income.

If your losses exceed capital gains, you can use up to $3,000 of loss to reduce regular income. Any excess loss can be carried over to future years to offset future gains.

At the same time, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and certain United States courts have ruled that cryptocurrencies are indeed “securities” within those Commissions’ regulatory scope. This regulatory effort was generally to stem the fraud and abuse through “initial coin offerings” or ICOs that sought to evade strict regulations designed to protect investors. While there is currently no indication that the IRS would consider cryptocurrency as “stocks or securities,” there is precedent for that conclusion from these other agencies and remains possible that the IRS could issue supplemental guidance and interpretations to that effect.

At the time of this writing, the IRS has not issued any such interpretation and savvy investors can consider the loss harvesting strategy if appropriate for their particular situation. As with all cryptocurrency transactions, good record keeping is paramount. It is especially critical to have accurate records to substantiate your losses if you are repurchasing the same crypto. Good and accurate records are the best tool in defending your position to the IRS, should the IRS take a position and disallow your claimed losses.

Contact Dan Artaev by email or call or text to set up your initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This guide is for general informational and promotional purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal, investment, or tax advice. Every situation is different and faces its own unique set of challenges. Do not take any action or sign any contract until you have obtained specific guidance from a qualified professional.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

International Skill-Based Real-Money Gaming: Is It Legal?

Previously, I wrote about the legality of skill-based real-money gaming in the United States. But the U.S. is not the only country where skill-based games are popular – real money competition is huge all over the world. For example, in India, skill-based gaming is not only a popular source of entertainment, but is also becoming a way to make a living. According to Ronaldo Landers, the CEO of the All India Gaming Federation, smartphone gaming has been the most significant contributor to the growth of real-money skill game business in India. That market alone is expected to gross close to $1 billion in revenue by 2025. Market studies currently estimate 350 million gamers in India and have reported a 21% increase in transaction-based gaming, with consistent growth expected in the near term.

Despite the worldwide popularity of skill-based gaming, legal compliance remains a challenge. The law is obviously different in each country and whether skill-based money games are legal depends on where you are. Sometimes there is no uniform national approach – both the United States and India regulate gaming on a regionalized state level. In India, each state has the power to make its own betting and gambling laws, which has led to a patchwork of legislation and judicial decisions. For example, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have banned all real-money games (whether gambling or skill based), Tamil Nadu permits skill games only, and Kerala has expressly banned real-money online rummy. The lack of national principles and regulations has even resulted in conflicting judicial decisions about whether poker is a skill-based or chance-based gambling game. The Gujarat and Bombay High Courts have determined that poker is a game of chance – while at the same time the Karnataka High Court has reached the opposite conclusion. To add to the confusion, the Supreme Court of India has opined that rummy is a skill game except if played for real-money stakes or if operators make a profit.

In Europe, gambling is generally governed on a national level. This means that each country has their own set of laws that define and regulate gambling. Skill-based games that fall outside the definition of gambling are permitted. For example, one popular skill-game platform active in the European Union only offers real money cash gaming in Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Luxembourg, Monaco, Netherlands, Romania, Spain, and Sweden. However, players located in France, Portugal, Italy, etc., are restricted to play for virtual “play” money only. All countries either regulate or outright prohibit gambling, so the question comes down to whether a particular skill-based game falls within that country’s definition of “gambling.” That question can only be answered by careful application of the particular country’s laws to the specific characteristics of the game.

What about cross-border play? Can a company based in the United States, India, or Germany offer games between players in different countries? It depends on where the players are located. In the United States, federal law does not prohibit skill-based real-money gaming. The most significant legislation – the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 – restricts financial transactions associated with “betting or wagering” if the “betting or wagering” is illegal where it is initiated or received. The UIGEA does not apply to most skill-based games, which are not a “game subject to chance.” But even if it involved a “bet or wager,” skill-based gaming is not unlawful in the majority of the states in the United States. So long as the bet or wager is legal in the state where it originates and in the state or country where it s received, there is no federal prohibition on the activity.

From a practical perspective, most skill-based gaming companies put the onus on the players to determine whether real-money skill-based gaming is legal in their particular jurisdiction. This is especially the case with non-U.S. based players – the terms and conditions require the end users to do their own due diligence. Of course, before a company can offer its skill-based game on a different country’s Apple App Store, the company will have to comply with that country’s specific terms and requirements. For instance, there may be geo-restriction or geo-location requirements. It is also likely that Apple (or Facebook for advertising purposes) will require a legal opinion about the legality of the game in the host country as well as the other countries where competitors are located.

Cross-border competition can be especially attractive to players looking to compete against friends and family located abroad. Gaming plays an important part in many cultures and increased accessibility through the internet and mobile app gaming presents opportunities for users to enjoy real-money gaming no matter where they are actually located. Whether celebrating the lunar new year through some fun family games or simply challenging your cousin to a $5 game of 8-ball, skill-based money games are a growing, popular market and business opportunity all over the world.

Have more questions? Need an expert legal opinion? Need help getting your app through the Facebook, Apple, or Google review process? Contact Dan Artaev today by emailing dan@artaevatlaw.com or by phone or text at (269) 930-0254.

Disclaimer: This guide is not intended to be and does not constitute legal advice. It is for informative and promotional purposes only. Do not take any action or refrain from taking any action based on this guide, and always consult with a qualified professional about the circumstances of your particular case. Each set of facts is unique and different circumstances apply to each individual business.

© 2021 Artaev at Law PLLC. All rights reserved.

Exit mobile version